What is the most important non-war event in human history?

What is the most important non-war event in human history?

Attached: 71.jpg (1500x748, 924K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

the birth of Christ

Attached: 125b77d305da7d106c2a624df9cce98d.jpg (564x751, 132K)

There was no Christ. Real answer is the printing press.

when they made the Harry Potter movies

Irrelevant. Ceasar more important.

Irrelevant. Paper more important.

Irrelevant. Lord of the Rings more important.

its only one of the best documented events in history

Attached: 79a.png (700x800, 13K)

That's not true.

Upstart date for this site

when I fucked you're mom

The beer hall putsch

Industrial Revolution

Learning to start a fire.

moon landing in '69

Yea, I thought Doug Stanhope was funny when I was like 17...

what's this pic about?

The creation of the Filet-O-Fish.

I too remember when Adam Sandler was way funnier

OP said human history, not religious fiction.

Well this thread is fucking stupid lol. But to answer your question the day America was created.

European discovery of America

How about the cultural switch from alcohol to coffee that occurred in Europe? That started some shit.

so when god created the earth

Caesar was an imperator among others. What he did, others like Pompey would've done it as well as the Roman republic had been rotting for centuries. The true founder of the empire is Augustus, if only because he actually had the time to leave something before his death.

Also, Jesus definitely existed as a Jewish mystic and prophet.

>"this thread is STUPID"
>uses "lol" in Sup Forums
>"MURRICA"
It's always summer in the trailer park...

Far future will probably reference this or yuri gagarin as first human in space.

Everybody knows Caesar. Nobody knows Augustus. Your premise is wrong and factually unstable.
Caesar is the most powerful man that ever existed, about 20,000 to 40,000 times more infuental and globally important than Jesus Christ.

I'm wondering if internet will surpass printing press, which surpassed written language, which surpassed spoken language. At least hundreds or thousands of years from now.

>Jesus Christ was born when America was created
Yup, gonna be a yikes for me sir

>makes stupid thread
>is assblasted when the right answer is posted
>t-trailer p-park

It's always summer for the foreigner

I think the invention of electricity would be a good candidate, as most of our current technology is electric now.

>Nobody knows Augustus
This has to be bait

Attached: 1563692322939.jpg (312x245, 14K)

These dubs, check em

Wasnt he born in jackson county Missouri? Or am I dumdumdumdum dumb dum.

never said anything about jesus
america was created when god created the land on earth

Probably the discovery of how to cultivate wheat. It single handedly changed the course of human history.

Wheat guaranteed that humans would not die off from lack of food. It forced people to stay in one area long enough for towns and villages to form, which is the basis of civilization.

Harry would fucking destroy Frodo 1v1

It was more discovery. Electricity was around way before us faggots figured out how to make nude pics of sluts with it.

I think if we go for "most powerful who ever existed", Gengis Khan would be a better pick.

Augustus name is about 2-3 million times less significant and known than Julius Gaius Ceasar. Try again.

Gengis Khan is a non-white and asian, thus making his legacy completely void on the grand scale of things. Try harder.

Yes it is

Jesus christ is the most popular, influential, and important person in the history of the world, and if you disagree you're wrong

Again, I'm not sure that is really an event. Seems moreso a breakthrough or emergent technology.

Landing on moon, end of war, birth of who ever is more event for me.

I'd say discovery of fire is the most important advancement we've made, but I wouldn't call it an event. Many ancient fags died to figure it out across many lands and times.

Jesus Christ a meme. Julius Ceasar still carries all the signifinance and respect all around the globe. Your premise is laughable, irrelevant and extremely stupid. Never post again.

Hand washing.

The council of Nicea. Where a bunch of guys figured out what exactly Christianity was supposed to be and who got to call the shots.
Martin Luther would be the next big religious change in the west.

Wasn't Jesus a sandnigger? Or are we talking about the white people version of Jesus, who had blonde hair and blue eyes like anyone who graduated high school is really suppose to believe that bullshit

No it wasn't, genius. Did they also have Burger King back then?

Eh, USA or ussr/russio leaders with nuke buttons would be more powerful in my mind. The ability to end a worldwide ecosystem in minutes is pretty powerful.

I find all religion to be cultist propaganda garbage, but most of what Jesus preached is a fine way to live one's life.

man didn't create the land of america but he did create Burger King
your logic is flawed

This is not widely accepted.

All I know is what south park taught me.

you said powerful, influential and globaly important.
GK was more powerful and important than Caesar was in his time. Caesar had a big impact on european culture, but it was more "the roman empire over centuries" than just good old Julius.
So no, the Khan is more important

Probably because he was referred to as Augustus Caesar. Thereby forever confusing idiots as to which Caesar was which.

Burger king chicken nuggets in the 90s may be worthy of the title of greatest ever.

Fire

You can't be globally important while being non-white. Try again. Even today that is true. Your logic is completely fragmented and hilariously weak.

It may end up being DNA discovery. If we can eventually manipulate it to our whims then we can become demi gods.

in raw power, yes.
In term of power compared to it's time period, the Khan built an unmatched empire, while most of our first-world nations today are at a standstill because of the threat of mutual annihilation.

It is amoung humans. Sub-humans don't count.

your logic is based on a racist argument.
By your own logic, the USA was powerless when Obama was president since he is black

No, I wish non-whites would be sometimes superior, too. Sadly that is never the case, because of white supremacy history on Earth.

Also, your argument exclude Mao's legacy, who made China one of the world's top powers.

Why not the fusion reactor and have the power of the sun in our hands?
Pretty pointless to bring up future events.

no

The discovery of metallurgy.

Yeah but those niggers ruin it for us real people.

Discovery of fire > some printy thing.

Your argument to refute my Khan proposal is that he is not white.
You can't claim not being a racist if that's your first argument. If you demonstrated why, and came to the conclusion that he was irrelevant in world's history (he wasn't), and happened to have been asian, I would have understood, but no, you made a point to start with "non-white, so irrelevant"
So, it was a racist argument.

By what standard? The biblical texts seem to be the only source. There are no Roman texts about anyone named Jesus or anyone called Christ or anyone establishing any kind of religious founding in or around Nazareth or Jerusalem until 50 or 60 years after Jesus' supposed death. No birth records, death records, court records, taxation records, nothing. The only time Jesus became relevant to Roman history is when Christians started becoming a relevant social demographic.

By that metric you might as well say the discovery/invention of fire.

Though that'd be a pretty good one, I don't think it's in the spirit of the debate.

I'm saying DNA discovery allows us to manipulate things, as fire allowed us warmth and food, and soap, etc.
Tabletop fusion reactors would be a game changer. Science could advance massively with low power costs.

Then what last century nuglet was supreme for low cost?
Arby's was great, but expensive.

What's more important: Technological innovation, or social innovation? Social innovations tend to precede technological ones, so you could argue that one causes the other. In which case, a particular technology, regardless of its impact, isn't as significant as the social dynamic that allowed that technology to be created.

When Christopher Columbus discovered America. It's the single most world changing event in history.

I concede.

Yeah, we'll see. I still stand by that future events are pointless to talk about for the topic in this thread.
But I get what you mean.

Fuck Indigenous Peoples' Day. All those fucks did was die in droves when a random Euro-trash conspiracy theorist coughed on them. Their history and culture were disgusting and despicable, and yet we're supposed to sympathize with them because the "evil white man" was stronger.

Ignore the many heinous sins of the Mayans, people! Christopher Columbus enslaved some of them and took their gold! That evil bastard!

Attached: 1433878431899.jpg (567x561, 54K)

Depends on the context. If we are talking strictly one time events, many of the most important part of humanity are not included. Farming, language, etc was a process. End of a war, discovery of an idea, an invention, a date of political importance is more event based.

Magna Carta

The invention of the lathe

DNA has been discovered. Its impact is already impressive and it may be the defining discovery of future humans. Same with all the space stuff. We haven't colonized other worlds, but we have set that precedence.

By the argument of social rather than technological innovation, I would say the signing of the Magna Carta was one of, if not the most, influential events that ever occurred. The very idea of holding a monarch to account, and to have a standardized and universally enforced principal of law and property ownership set the foundation for everything that made the current world possible. No Magna Carta, no DNA discovery. No nuclear reaction discovery. No antibiotics discovery. Not unless some other nation did something similar, but Magna Carta was the first, and set England up to ultimately become the British Empire, which I would argue was the most generous and uplifting Empire in the history of the world. For all the colonization was often cruel, it was probably a bit like being invaded by aliens that enslaved you but also cured world hunger and cancer.

said muhammed there was a jesus from nazareth
said the apostles
said the jewish religious beards
said the roman centurion
was he the divinity? maybe maybe not,but jesus was, still deny it?
flatearther
no holocaust
zionists run everything everywhere
n0 moon landing right?

the indigenous Indian population discovered it way before then.

harnessing fire

So?

So only religious texts, which often draw inspiration from each other.

Jesus is a rehash of Horus from Egyptian myth.

ANy other answer except this is irrelevant:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
This put the end to the dark ages where ppl just ate and fought

This is the reason ur able to write words on an anime imageboard in 2019

And what did they do with that discovery?

2500 years of stone-age warfare.

nugs are just not good brah they're all processed chicken paste

The lathe started the industrial world.

but they made nothing of it.
Indigenous indians were still at a stage of tribal culture, something that europeans and asians had passed millenias ago.

Is the scientific method a technology, or a social innovation?

Because I think the spirit of this thread is social events. Because if we're going technology, then language, agriculture, fire, and numbers are probably more important.

Invention of gunpowder

They're a vector for sauce. The only nugget sauce I like is McDonalds spicy buffalo, though. It's a bit vinegary, but the rest of the fast food sauces are too goddamn sweet.

Internet. It made the entire world small. I can find out when a girl decides to pour a white claw down her gaping asshole, or if a world leader had been killed, within seconds of each other

Very cohesive user.

Why do you think I specifically mentioned European discovery?

The historical evidence is pretty conclusive, Jesus did exist.

There is more evidence for him than Caesar