Why cant the left meme? I've realized it's because only one side feels the emotional need...

Why cant the left meme? I've realized it's because only one side feels the emotional need. The right seems more obsessed with hating the left than vice versa. All they talk about is the left. Day in and day out, they are the only thing on their minds.

Attached: 1553290427149(1).jpg (611x409, 146K)

go to the front page of reddit if you actually think the left doesn't hate the right, or post anything pro-right (or pro-anyone right wing) on r/politics

Welcome to Sup Forums Comrade

Attached: 1551793727453.png (1252x182, 55K)

because it's an art form.
if you've noticed the left's taste in art is terrible.
they also don't get symbolism.

Are left autistic?

Attached: 636140.jpg (540x960, 55K)

Attached: 635000.jpg (817x960, 73K)

Attached: 633048.jpg (624x543, 41K)

>Why cant the left meme?

It's because meme's don't mean anything. They only mean something to a certain NEET culture that exists on the internet. Grow up.

The next ice age is going to be so satisfying.

Attached: 632530.jpg (1080x1028, 95K)

Attached: 632004.png (640x599, 582K)

Attached: 630171.jpg (1125x1501, 182K)

This person obviously doesnt understand the electoral college or the impeachment process.

>See graphic
>Hoping for Posadist thread
>See this bullshit
>MFW the nukes aren't dropping

Attached: 03bejpk4.jpg (512x512, 48K)

They ate the memeberrie. Why still care?

Attached: 1572456841740.jpg (795x795, 67K)

Jokes need to be a little edgy to be funny and establishment left is too busy pandering to handle a little japery. And the right is obsessed with the left because they are the prevailing philosophical movement in US, but we believe that "all things should have a coordinated opposition to keep them in check" so the right's only reason to exist right now is to shit on lefty policy for the sake of it, even if it does more harm than good, unintentionally or otherwise.

Right wing people work hard to enjoy the fruits of their labour. They make themselves responsable for their own problems and solve it, with leads to success

Left wing people are losers who live by blaming and manipulating others to be able to steal what they want without having to work.

The left is the one who is always resented by their own failure and the succes of others. The right just want to be left alone

Attached: 1462487588124.jpg (480x236, 16K)

Huh, think I have a clown fetish now. Thanks.

Wrong.
Right wing people see no institutional problems, and view everything as an issue of personal responsobility
>poor people are poor because they're lazy. Not because wages aren't keeping up with prices, and fewer resources

Left wingers tend to acknowledge the bigger picture
>poor people would have more oppurtunities at upward mobility without barriers like high tuition rates, healthcare costs, and rising housing costs

Plus, the economics behind leftist policies just works better

Do you?

You got a source on this though?

Wrong

>Right wing people see no institutional problems
Yeah, because I've never hear any libertarian criticizing goverment.

They know that things get solved with hard work, regardless if life is fair or unfair


>poor people would have more oppurtunities at upward mobility without barriers like high tuition rates, healthcare costs, and rising housing costs
False. All those things aren't free. They get paid by taxes. High taxes (even if only applied to the rich) develops into low interest in investing, which leads to lack of jobs and rises the prices of everything in the market, which leads to more goverment intervention to help the poor... and this circle just brings huge inflation by printing money or taking debt.

Yeah, works fantastic in every example, like Argentina, Bolivia, Venezuela, Soviet Union, Cuba, North Corea, East Germany, China and any other country that had to build a wall to prevent their people from running away. In before the nordic model: Every country in that region is between the top 1 and 15 free economies, as Lars Rasmusen said (prime minister of Denmark)

Attached: 5823e469642aa66c5f3ed53d727db50b-this-is-wong.jpg (600x399, 72K)

>High taxes (even if only applied to the rich) develops into low interest in investing
I know this is not actually true because of mid-20th century history, but I'm curious as to why you would imagine that to be so?

>Climate Change Fanaticts in 2070 when their grandkids ask them why they wrecked their own economy while shithole countries didn't stop fucking the environment and the ice caps are gone

>In before the nordic model: Every country in that region is between the top 1 and 15 free economies, as Lars Rasmusen said (prime minister of Denmark)
Which strongly suggests there are more important measures of economic freedom than merely income tax rates (which are quite high there), which undermines your previous point.

Do you?

>Automobile Fantatics in 1970 when their grandkids ask them why they wrecked their own economy while shithole countries didn't stop breeding horses for transport

>Automobile Deniers in 1970 when their grandkids ask then why they wrecked their horses on the highway

Do you?

>libertarians
They're braindead anyway so who cares?
>things get solved with hard work
They can, but you're more likely to succeed if you're born with more access to the resources you need. Why not level the playing field a bit?
>high taxes causes low interest in investing
>high taxes leads to less jobs
Wrong. Both those things are decided primarily by the public's demand for goods and services. A company taxed less won't hire more workers if it doesn't need to to keep up with current demand. Also, people are gonna invest in companies with solid earnings. Companies can remain profitable, and pay taxes
>example countries that have different systems advocated for by the American left
You're a brainlet

If you are an investor and want to build a business, in which of this examples would you build it?:

Argentina:
- The goverment takes 50% of your gains
- 16.000 regulations, means, for example, that you have to pay a U$5.000 mensual permision to move a product from one place to the other. To move food from one sector of Buenos Aires city to the other, you need 23 permissions. To move it from west germany to east germany you needed 2.
- 160 taxes
- Half of the cost of every product the consumers buy is taxes, which means less people will be able to buy it
- Unions can brake your business in half in a court by pretty much anything if an ex employee want's to
- You can't fire an employee without paying him an awful fucking lot, which lowers any company functionality a lot, because every employee knows he won't get fired that easy and if so, he will get a lot of money from you. You can fire him with excuse if he did something really bad, but this never end well in court for you
Any other country without all that bullshit


Not more important but yes, there are other important issues like the ones I mention above. But the nordic model isn't actually the best case for that, because the "high taxes" are not for companies. There is a documentary about this which explains how the actually taxes the poor

Attached: 1406268017125.jpg (259x194, 11K)

Partisans can't meme in general, you're right, they're so overly estrogened the fuck out to the point logic doesn't take.

Fuck the left and the right, or any political group or party. Founding fathers were right, partisanism will destroy us.

>They're braindead anyway so who cares?
What an argument

>They can, but you're more likely to succeed if you're born with more access to the resources you need. Why not level the playing field a bit?

Because it means stealing from the rich, which leads to low investing, lower jobs and so on as I already explained. What you need is to give the poor jobs so that they can access to education, as in America, 90% of immigrants get out of poverty in 2 years without even going to college.
Argentina has free healthcare and free universities. Also 36% of it's people are poor, the averange income is U$300 and 200% inflation per year


>Wrong. Both those things are decided primarily by the public's demand for goods and services. A company taxed less won't hire more workers if it doesn't need to to keep up with current demand. Also, people are gonna invest in companies with solid earnings. Companies can remain profitable, and pay taxes

The taxes pressures on the consumption because it makes the products cost more, which leads to less demand. Also, even if there is more demand in other countries to which you export and have lower taxes, in order to grow, the company needs to save money and then invest it. This will lead to new jobs. This won't happen if half the income of the company goes to the goverment. Argentinians save 1 for every 2 dollars of income, yet it can't grow since 2011 becuase no one invest here

Attached: 1421833341851.jpg (236x200, 20K)

>taxes are stealing
Guess you're a libertarian?
>higher taxes leads to less investment x2
How much people invest in a business is dependent on how profitable they view that business being. A business is more profitable when it sells more than what it spends. People buy more when they have more money. People have more money when tuition, healthcare, and housing aren't insanely expensive. Do you know what i am saying?
>give the poor jobs so they have access to education
People find it hard to get an education when they're working multiple jobs to survive, user
>argentina
A shithole with publicly funded healthcare and tuition is not the same as America with public funded healthcare and tuition
>taxes make the products cost more
Only if companies choose to compensate for less profit with higher prices on their goods. If people don't buy them, that's the free market telling them to sell them cheaper, or improve the products they're selling
>companies need lower taxes to grow
See above. Also, keeping interest rates low would help everyone out. Cheaper expansion, more affordable home loans, etc

Hehh

You know the more we produce the more we consume making the technology nothing but an accelerator to our gluttony meaning you, as a laborer, are not worth any more than before. It doesn't take rocket science to understand that but ig people prefer to whine

Same thread on Sup Forums
Shill btfo