I'm an atheist! Debate me!

I'm an atheist! Debate me!
Come at me Sup Forumsro!!!

Attached: atheist_debate_me.jpg (491x541, 52K)

Why are you "morally superior" to all religions, yet at the same time treat every living thing with disrespect?

WHY?

Imagine transhumanism kicks in 24h after ur dead since you are body positive.

how calcified is your pineal gland?

Capitalism is bound to crash and the masses will go to the far ends of politics to survive. Socialism is the only hope for a humanity benefiting everyone

I don't think i'm morally superior to all religions. I don't know all religions lol.

I do think i'm morally superior to the christian religion.

>treat every living thing with disrespect?

Is that an atheist stereotype? I'm not familiar with that one.

Attached: atheist_debate_me2.jpg (512x512, 32K)

אני יעשה זאת בעין חזקה אחי

why not?

I am an atheist but now I just I became completely agnostic, atheism became proportionate to veganism.

lol what?

never had it checked

Do you hold a belief that a god or gods exist?

People like you give us a bad name

I'm proud of you user.
But I also don't give a flying fuck about what you believe. Just like you don't give a flying fuck about what I believe.
So bye now.

>People like you give us a bad name

Why? What's upsetting to you about this post?

Because nowadays atheism is apparently synonymous with Nihilism

>atheism is apparently synonymous with Nihilism


only to Sup Forumstards

When and how did you manage to give up upon your religion which was given to you at your birth?

Maybe you should get a personality instead.

>"debate me"
>my beliefs are right and yours are wrong
>my beliefs matter
>yours don't
>open antagonism

Why bother? The best thing about atheism is you don't (or shouldn't) believe you have any obligation to prove anything. Here you are trying to prove something in the name of a community that isn't trying to prove anything. Think about it.

It's exactly 3:39 pm. Fight me about it.

You need to use Google first.

This

I actually wasn't raised in religion. My brother was born again and insisted that i read the bible. That did not help my atheism lol

Never had one forced upon me.

Um...burn?

Attached: 190512-186784-idunno.jpg (620x406, 27K)

Agnosticism gang standing by.

IMO Atheism is for edgy teens overidentifying with their intelligence and forcing a superiority complex.

If you've learned enough about science and the universe from the fact and logic based perspective atheists claim to have, then it is the ultimate act of hurbris to ignore that human senses do not tell the entire objective truth, and claim that you (a relatively clever ape who learned some math) has any business stating conclusively that there is no chance whatsoever that any greater power, which we may or may not have yet become cognisant of, might possibly be out there.

>pic not supposed to be related, but now that ya mention it...

Attached: 1569961238382.jpg (896x960, 92K)

Wow.

You sure inferred an awful lot of things i never said or implied lol.
Bit of a hair trigger there, bud?

> don't (or shouldn't) believe you have any obligation to prove anything.

Totally agree. But no one but you has mentioned an obligation.

>Here you are trying to prove something in the name of a community

Prove? You mistake my purpose. Debating is FUN. It's not about proving anything.


I hope next time you'll consider talking to a person before you condemn them entirely

Attached: gundam_style.jpg (720x704, 50K)

Can you be more specific?

Attached: 1325359075650.jpg (192x199, 6K)

>Agnosticism gang standing by.

IMO you're an atheist unless you believe that a god or god exists.

Do you believe a god or gods exist?

Do you believe in yourself?

Your lack of obligation is what proves you've chosen to openly antagonize. If you were compelled by some perceived obligation then it would be different but this is a choice you made.

Are you hoping to be refuted?

Agnosticism is for retards. They are atheists with their brain and balls removed.

Like motivationally or as a being that exists?

Sorry, you lost me.

My lack of OBLIGATION to debate means that by debating i am being openly antagonistic?
Do you consider debate to be antagonist?

No. You can believe what you want, sure, but that diminishes the beliefs of agnosticism. Agnosticism is neither the belief or disbelief in deities, but the acceptance that we do not know with certainty.

Atheism is the very specific disbelief in deities. The specific opinion that they, with absolute certainty, do not nor have ever existed.

As you can see I'm not trying to made this conversation as debate, my questions are simple.

Can't. You're a bit of an intellectual if you will and I do not wish to have my ignorance exposed

Define God.

An imaginary delusion by an scitzophrenic in denial of death.

Then you clearly don't know the difference.

You opened the thread with the challenge "Debate me".
It was not an invitation, as one such would have been "You're welcome to debate me."
Yours was a command. Like "Fight me." or "Try me."

if god doesn't exist, then how come I'm right here? Checkmate, atheists.

How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?

You're a little off.

Atheists believe that no deity exists. It's a belief system, no different than any other religion.

Agnostics don't believe in deities, and they accept nothing without evidence. "Smart enough to know that they're not smart enough to know".

lol i opened this thread with an OLD meme.

I'm sorry if you considered a challenge to debate to be antagonism. If i'm being honest, the only OPEN antagonism appears to be coming from your direction.

Anyway, i hope i've expressed my position clearly enough at this point to make it clear that i;m just here to debate because i find it fun, even if i didn't offer it as a passive invitation.

Again, i hope that next time you'll speak to a person before you assign them motivation and condemn them for it. THAT, imo gives us a bad name.

Attached: 1337205607040.jpg (548x600, 33K)

Yeah. Fuck Boipuss.

Attached: 4ec60a0bcdc7139d56b3686f36ec96d8-imagejpeg.jpg (675x1500, 184K)

Google it again.

>The specific opinion that they, with absolute certainty, do not nor have ever existed.


Nope.
You are quite mistaken.

An atheist simply disbelieves or lacks believe in a god gods. Certainty does not enter into it.

If you, user, do not believe that a god or god exists then you are an atheist.
An agnostic atheist in fact which is the only reasonable kind of atheist one can be.

Attached: consider_the_following.jpg (251x188, 6K)

>my questions are simple.

Evidently not or i wouldn't have had to ask you to clarify lol

A conscious being with agency and will responsible for creating the universe or in some way controlling aspects of nature or humanity.

>appropriating separate misrepresented belief systems into your beliefs system

We're done here.

Nope.

Agnostic/gnostic identifies a position of knowledge (or lack thereof).
Atheist/theist denotes a position of belief.

Therefore you can be an atheist who recognizes that the existence of a god cannot be known one way or another. That would make you an agnostic atheist.

If you find fault with my reasoning then feel free to offer a rebuttal.

Attached: Weird-Al-(2011)---c.-of-Sony-Music.jpg (460x487, 61K)

And dude, before you make your haughty exit, remember that you just totally misrepresented what an atheist is...

You might have a point there, user.

Attached: 1416520217398.jpg (562x450, 27K)

Why aren’t you sitting on the fence about pixies and elves? You can’t disprove them. And yet, for a far more ridiculous invention, the christian god, you wet your pants and climb up onto the fence. You should ask yourself why.

I'm and I'm open to the idea that some kind of power or entity COULD exist that some people might be inclined to call a god. The only thing I believe, hard and fast, is that there's a rational explanation for everything. If something like what people call god(s) do(es) exist, I think it's definitely not a literal old white man in the clouds. People generally seem to be too closed minded when considering the implications of such an entity existing.

But at the end of the day I'm just trying to be humble and objective enough to admit that I have no fucking clue one way or the other. I'd like to not depend on such giant assumptions just for some vague peace of mind.

I think we can be humble enough to admit that we don't know one way or the other and still be either convinced or unconvinced by the evidence.

I maintain that if you do not believe that a god is real then you are necessarily an atheist.