Now that Trump has been impeached, how long until he's out of office officially?
Now that Trump has been impeached, how long until he's out of office officially?
but he hasnt been impeached
why does it matter? you idiots realize republicans are just gonna run him again in 2020
impeaching a president who only has 1 year to go before the election is pointless
also,this is coming from somebody who thinks both trump supporters and democrats are shit
the house voted for an inquiry of impeachment, not the impeachment itself.
Basically means they will formally and officially be able to allocate people and resources for the means of investigation, followed by an actual impeachment if evidence of broken laws is found.
>0 (zero) House Republicans voted to support the inquiry into impeaching Trump
>2 House Democrats voted against it
Kek, take your L you whining faggot
There's Trump's boy...
they still don't have the necessary numbers, and if trump falls it will be replaced by Pence. how damn retarded are the lefties
Wow cogent response
Thank you for making Teflon Don relevant yet again. He'll be happy to use you as a stepping stone to his second term as YOUR President elect.
Have a nice day.
democrats have wasted soooooooo much money on inquiries, investigations, trials, special councils.... they might as well waste a few billion more and get nothing out of it, they're paychecks will stay the same
>take your L
lol,since when did republicans start using nigger language?
>they're paychecks
meanwhile,you sit in your trailer park off the goverment and smoke meth and fuck your sister all day.like the average idiot who supports donald trump
It's my America bill is right that let's me anyways
blended scotch
>but he hasnt been impeached
cope
dilate
God says he'll be out next June.
"and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months."
– Rev 13:4-5
i dont think it matters at this point,he's the democrats bitch
even if he manages to get re elected.democrats will just get more seats in the house and senate and will fuck him over on everything he wants
LOCK HIM UP
>god
he says,while supporting a president who never goes to church.maybe you can grab god's pussy like your degenerate president
people who call themselves christians that support donald trump are the same people who went to kanye's sunday service and acted like it was a real religious thing
Amen
Yes, but as far as I know, they didn't even have to do that, did they. Even the courts refused a case regarding this, that's how uncontroversial that is.
$15> single malt
I too copy paste the same messages over and over again like someone with low functioning autism
Legally they can do whatever they want. You can thank the Republicans for that, since they're the ones who changed the law back when Obama was actually accomplishing great things for us and the Republicans didnt like that.
January 2025 guaranteed.
Maybe instead of impeachment try running a candidate that isn't hot refried garbage in 2020?
I should clarify, thats why the court refused to do anything about it. Judge probably took one look at it and said "wait a minute, the Republicans changed this to begin with, why would I step in because they no longer like the changes they themselves made"
>guaranteed
prove it
kek wut
>Obama "accomplishing great things for us"
Gonna need to cite some examples there, bucko
A president has to do something illegal to be impeached, so Trump can't be impeached.
How fast did Clinton got kicked out of office after he was impeached?
t. John Boner
Seriously though, even if there was something bad about the procedure, the republicans are still going to end up defending an obvious criminal. Their squirming is glorious, my only fear is democrats will fuck it up. All they need to do is be aggressive and stay on point, don't go on the defensive needlessly, just focus on the fact that every single piece of evidence -including the pseudo-transcript- is against Trump.
The first ex gay president would be one for the history books
Trump didn't even get impeached, this vote was to see if they should actually do a legitimate impeachment inquiry. It should have happened months ago. Announcing that you are doing an impeachment inquiry and then not voting for it for 2 months is the lowest of low class.
calling right wingers degenerates xD xD xD xD xD
That's the only existence of that post on this board, brainlet user.
Newsflash, Sparky:
Dimwit Dumpy's impeachment began back in September.
>LMAO what if I post wrong stuff on the internet so that people thing le libtardz are dumb xDDDD
>impeaching a president who only has 1 year to go before the election is pointless
You are missing the point.....
Nancy is playing the long game
> They have enough evidence to impeach Trump. And they will.
> Each an every GOP member of congress that is up for re-election in 2020 will have to stand up and explain why that ignored the evidence and rule of law.
Dems have the house, they will win the senate too.
Most Americans will vote for whomever is running against who the GOP nominates. Trump, Pence or anybody else.
Closeted homosexuality is much more common among the GOP than among the general population.
- McConnell and Graham are both famous gloryhole queans.
- Devin Nunes, Stephen Miller, Jim Jordan, and that dumb dentist are all midnight cruisers.
- Lord Justice Boofter prefers sexual encounters where the men outnumber the women three to one.
- GEOTUS himself learned to suck cock from Roy Cohn.
Ah, I see you fell for Republican propaganda. House Democrats had no legal obligation to hold a vote. They did this to shut up crybaby Republicans who said none of it was legit because a vote wasn't passed. And you know what, THEY'RE STILL BITCHING ABOUT IT BEING ILLEGITIMATE. It's almost like the party is comprised of spineless cowards more interested in party over country, and others who are involved in the shady shit trump has been doing.
He hasn't been impeached.
They voted yes on one of two votes to start impeachment proceedings.
They then have to vote in the house to impeach.
They then have to move that vote to a heavily republican controlled senate.
They then have to actually remove him from office.
Bill Clinton was impeached when he won his second term
The interesting thing is that "they" had enough evidence to impeach when they got Mueller's report. He offered "them" ten or eleven articles with all the dots connected but "they" chose to look at their own feet instead.
Funny how "they" bestirred themselves when Doofus went after Biden.
Go back to Ribbit.
Not until the election. The ass kissing senate republicans will never vote him guilty.
But Clinton did, right?
That will depend on what shit hits the fan.
Pelosi is a creep, but she's a crafty creep. Her timing suggests that she has more cards in her hand than she needs. Some of those cards might expose governmental corruption more generally than would be prudent, so she's been holding them back.
Wrong, doesn't have to be illegal at all in any way
I'm hopeful that they'll take the aggressive route. Their new resolution allocates time for legal counsel to ask questions, up to 90 minutes. Did you see Barry Berke's questioning of Lewandowski? If not look it up, it's great to have somebody who actually knows the law asking questions.
I really would like to see legal council ask the questions. It would be nice to see some career employees hammer down hard and follow up smart. Instead of Republicans using their 5 minutes and just sitting there saying nothing to stall and pass the time so as to not let any facts get spoken.
I really don't think that was the case, it's just that the Ukraine situation is a super clear example of quid pro quo. If they had gone with the Mueller report, Republicans would've bullshitted that it "technically" doesn't implicate Trump because there was "insufficient evidence" to bring charges against him.
Why are you stupid enough to think ANYONE will vote for him after he is impeached ? Good job Trumpalumpa ....Grats you're a Trumptard !! All hail king dumb fuck !
Not who you responded to but I hate when people call it a quid pro quo. We should call it what it actually was. Extortion.
>it's just that the Ukraine situation is a super clear example of quid pro quo
delusions of a brainlet fag
If the majority of Americans don't think he should have been impeached and know that this entire process is a big sham full of lies and no crimes, why do you think they will not vote for him? He would have been illegitimately removed from office.
what a waste of lucky 7s, eat peepee operator
The House will officially come to order!
Yes, that would be you who doesnt dispute what I said or otherwise disagree, since you know it's the truth
since when is 42 % not for impeachment considered the " majority" ? ....Holy fuck you ppl are in denial so badly its sickening
So the world is just supposed to endure the criminal antics of this moron? At least Republicans will have to go on record as supporting crime at the highest levels, to their eternal shame. Not that it will matter to the amoral swine who vote for them, such as yourself.
Is that you, Ben Gozzy?
You misunderstand, I think he should be removed from office. That's just what I think the logic will be when he ends up being impeached.
At start, Dow was 7,949. It tripled in 8 years
GM & Chrysler were almost bankrupt, risking millions of jobs. Obama's $80 billion bailout saved them, which they repayed with interest
No terrorist org successfully executed a mass attack. He ordered the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden.
Drew down Iraq/Afghanistan troops from 180,000 to 15,000, and increased funding for the Dept. of Veterans Affairs.
He launched "Opening Doors" which led to a 47% decline in the number of homeless veterans.
He set a record 73 straight months of private-sector job growth.
His regulatory policies cut greenhouse gas emissions by 12%, renewable energy production more than doubled, and foreign oil dependence halved.
He signed The Lilly Ledbetter Act, making it easier for women to sue employers for unequal pay.
He reduced the federal deficit from 9.8 percent of GDP in 2009 to 3.2 percent in 2016.
Before the ACA, you could be denied coverage for a pre-existing condition and kids could not stay on their parents' policies up to age 26.
Obama approved a $14.5 billion system to rebuild the levees in New Orleans.
Guantanamo Bay's population decreased from 242 to around 50.
He expanded funding for research that supported groundbreaking advancement in areas like spinal injury treatment and cancer.
Credit card companies can no longer charge hidden fees or raise interest rates without advance notice.
Welfare spending is down: for every 100 poor families, just 24 receive cash assistance, compared with 64 in 1996.
He never tried to take away anyone's guns.
First president since Eisenhower to serve two terms without personal or political scandal.
During this, Mitch McConnell said his singular mission would be to block anything President Obama tried to do.
It's close to impossible for the reps to take the Senate. They'll prolly keep the house
In the Ukraine shakedown there's extortion and obstruction of justice. Definitely crimes. There's election law criminal violations all over the place, such as paying hush money to porn stars. You saying "that's not a crime" does not actually make it not a crime.
The dems will prove it themselves soon enough.
I agree but just have to say, bin laden didn't exist
So you cant back up anything you're saying. Yeah, that's what we thought lol
you cant fucking impeach someone simply because they hurt your fragile fucking snowflake feelings.
this is how dumb you lefties are. he wasn't impeached you fucking idiot.
Of this entire list about 50% are false. And more than 1/2 of the remaining aren't great thibgs
Your suspension of belief isn't worth my time.
you absolutely fucking can because that's how our government works, you braindead fucking retard.
Yes you can. He can be impeached for literally anything at all. Maybe he looked at Pelosi the wrong way. Doesn't matter. He can be impeached.
There's one thing I don't understand about the whole Ukraine thing: In the case of the Russia collusion thing, assuming that were true, the issue would have been that Trump asked Russia to investigate Hillary and the DNC, then Russian hackers ILLEGALLY hacked information and made it public, so if Trump colluded, it would have proven that he conspired to break the law. In this case Trump would have deserved to be impeached. HOWEVER, with the whole Ukraine call, even if Trump had asked the president of Ukraine to investigate Joe/Hunter Biden, and they had done so LEGALLY to the extent of their country's legal investigations, then even though Trump obtained information on Joe/Hunter, every part of the process would have been LEGAL. In this case, Trump literally did nothing wrong at all. Even if he had done a quid pro quo, it is one of the responsibilities of the office of president of the USA to handle foreign policy, and part of handling foreign policy is deciding whether or not they should receive aid. Even if that aid were approved by congress, the president would have had veto power to withhold it. So even if you assume the worst about EVERYTHING and paint Trump in the WORST light about this Ukraine call, not only did he not break any laws, he did nothing outside of the capabilities of the office of president, and there is NOTHING to impeach him over.
No but you can impeach someone for breaking the law and colluding to rig another election , You can when he lies his ass off and acts unethically on a daily basis ..You can when he cheats on his taxes stupid ...DUH
Jan 2021. If the elections are counted correctly.
Prove it with facts and evidence. Show your sources or thou art ahn faggot
Auto bail outs were signed in dec2008. Thank bush
The time it takes for your Elmer Fudd tattoo to heal.
bent over to every country whos ass we kicked in wars and "apologized" started and fueled the race gap we have going on, added trillions to the defecit, negotiated with terrorist, forced people to buy healthcare, then fined them if they couldnt afford it or didnt want it, the list goes on and on
He'll resign by Saturday
The argument is that Congress voted military aid to them, and Trump withheld it as a bargaining chip to get the information.
King onigger ruined this country
rig another election?? you're thinking of hilary and the dems, who tried to rig the last on and lost, and unethical, or just simply unfiltered, just bc it may hurt your fragile feelings, doesnt mean its unethical
See
>Now that Trump has been impeached
Technically the dems did that by not putting up anyone better
When did Hillary win any election moron ? ...Trumpalumpa on king dumb ass
Democratic primary that was rigged?
And?? The office of president is the branch most responsible for foreign policy. Even if congress had approved aid, by his discretion, the president has every right to withhold the aid at a future date. Imagine for example the same situation came up but between when the aid was approved, Ukraine nuked one of our allies. In that case OBVIOUSLY the president can immediately withhold that aid regardless of whether congress decided upon it or if they had time to reconvene to reverse their approval.
What criminal antics you retard, he hasn't had a single conviction you dumb nigger faggot.
HA yea so rigged she was chosen by her peers and party...God no wonder Trump won you ppl have 0 clue how the process works .....
>every part of the process would have been LEGAL
Wrong. In US campaign law, merely asking for help from a foreign entity is illegal. The fact that Trump held back military aid makes it just that much worse.
>In the case of the Russia collusion thing, assuming that were true
It's not an assumption, it is objectively true and proven by facts.
>Russian hackers ILLEGALLY hacked information and made it public
Yes, they did. But that's not trump's fault. Trump didn't break the law because Russia broke the law. And I dont really know if he broke the law there by just asking.
>even if Trump had asked the president of Ukraine to investigate Joe/Hunter Biden
I think you mean "even though" and not "even if" since it's an objective fact that he did
>and they had done so LEGALLY to the extent of their country's legal investigations, then even though Trump obtained information on Joe/Hunter, every part of the process would have been LEGAL
What was illegal was extorting a foreign government for information on a political opponent, not the fact that they actually said they would investigate.
>In this case, Trump literally did nothing wrong at all.
Considering he broke the law by extortioning a foreign government, I don't think that statement is accurate at all.
>Even if he had done a quid pro quo
he did, objectively.
>he did nothing outside of the capabilities of the office of president
Yeah.. except extorting a foreign government and breaking the law multiple times.
>and there is NOTHING to impeach him over.
Objective facts prove otherwise, but if you say so.
Imagine thinking the primaries are rigged and the general election isnt.
It's common knowledge the dnc railroaded the primary
>In the Ukraine shakedown there's extortion and obstruction of justice.
Proof?
>There's election law criminal violations all over the place, such as paying hush money to porn stars
Proof?
It has to actually have happened to be a charge. You libshits seem to think that because you say something it makes it become reality. Nope, retard, it doesn't work that way.