President Barack HUSSEIN Obama created over 14.6 MILLION jobs for you and look how you repay him

...

Other urls found in this thread:

bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_07082016.htm
bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.htm
washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/07/24/do-10000-baby-boomers-retire-every-day/
youtube.com/watch?v=C52TlPCVDio&feature=youtu.be&t=470
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009
youtube.com/watch?v=PirVtiJuvDs
bostonmagazine.com/arts-entertainment/blog/2013/10/10/shark-tank-kevin-oleary-boston/
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/filename/Obama_based/type/op/
marketwatch.com/story/us-still-creating-plenty-of-good-paying-jobs-2016-04-20
shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts
gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Obama's "legacy"

Research: "labor force participation rate".

That tells you how many people are actually working.

Unemployment rate only measures people looking for work. If you give up, you're not "unemployed". A lot of 2-income families are now 1-income since Obama.

You best bury this thread now, Hillary.

how are student loans since the 1940s in unadjusted dollars Obama's legacy?

One wonders, why does the Canadian still shitpost for the HNIC given the abysmal exchange rate between USD and CAD? Is he practically doing it for free? How dire is the economic situation in the land of syrup and cucks?

>LOL AHAHAH HOLY SHIT BEING THIS FUCKING RETARDED

Research: "labor force participation rate".

That tells you how many people are actually working.

NO IT DOESN'T YOU FUCKING MORON.

It tells you how many 80 year old retired grandmas, stay at home moms, etc there are.

Holy shit you're fucking stupid.

Seriously just kill yourself. You're a fucking moron.


>Research: "labor force participation rate".

>That tells you how many people are actually working.

You may have just said the dumbest fucking thing ever on Sup Forums, Now that is saying something.

>given the abysmal exchange rate between USD and CAD?

So you're saying that the Obama economy is so strong that the USD is mighty powerful.

I agree with you.

>being this fucking retarded

OP chart is of job creation, not the unemployment rate you fucking moron.

What the fuck does a chart of job creation have to do with the CLFPR?

NOTHING.

You're a fucking retard.

>
thx 4 the screenshot

You just proved my point with your own graph, Hillary.

"Taking care of family" = gave up trying to find work and became a stay at home mom.

"Disabled" = the growing list of easy ways you can be "disabled". I know a girl that sits at home and collects government disability because she's bi-polar. Perfectly functional person. Just found a doctor who's willing to say she can't work because she's bi-polar.

More people do this now that jobs are harder to find under Obama.

Also, your extreme reaction betrays your weak position.

>politicians create jobs

this is literally what statists believe

Jan 2009 142,099,000 jobs
June 2016 151,097,000 jobs
equals 8,998,000 more jobs than when he took office.
Jan 2001 135,999,000 jobs.
Meaning 6,100,000 jobs were created during the bush administration.

Of course the federal reserve didn't create trillions of new money.

bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_07082016.htm

bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.htm

Lol there are no stay at home moms allowed in America?

So Melania Trump is so useless that she's unemployed?

You're only digging deeper.

You're such a fucking moron that you don't know that baby boomers are retiring in record numbers.

DO YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A BABY BOOMER RETIRES?

THEY LEAVE THE LABOR FORCE.

washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/07/24/do-10000-baby-boomers-retire-every-day/

You seriously are fucking retarded.

Higher high school graduation rates, more university students, and baby boomers retiring. That's why the CLFPR is lower.

Now tell me again you stupid fucking moron.

My OP chart is of job creation. What does job creation have to do with the CLFPR. In your own words retard. You can't explain it can you?

why Sup Forums loves Milton Friedman.

WEAPONIZED ILLEGAL MEXICANS

youtube.com/watch?v=C52TlPCVDio&feature=youtu.be&t=470

And the president at that.

CONGRESS can potentially create (and destroy) jobs. By creating new laws or abolishing old laws, it's possible for them to open up or eliminate markets.

e.g., Congress makes it illegal to drill for oil. Boom, oil industry dead. Or they authorize subsidies for auto-makers. Boom, more auto-makers.

This isn't really a good way to do things but it's at least feasible.

The president, however, has no such power.

*part time jobs

Your numbers are way off. The entire Bush presidency only increased 1.1 million jobs.

Learn to do math you retard.

95% full time actually. Keep lying about and shitting on your own country though. Typical right wing retard.

So tell us, what, specifically, did Obama personally do to create jobs?

Go ahead and tell us.

What executive action made these jobs you're talking about. Point me to the resource online so I can read this action that Obama took. Not Congress, which has turned into Republican controlled, but the executive branch.


Pro-tip:
Everything good that has happened under Obama has happened since the Republican takeover of Congress. Obama's shittiest years were the first 2, when Democrats controlled both the legislative and executive branches.

I'm glad we agree that the economy does better under Democrats.

I assume therefore, that for a strong economy, you are voting for a Democratic president.

Obama and the Democrats literally saved America from another Republican Great Depression.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009

The private sector created those jobs. Which this mega national debt prez has no control over. And never should control.

Look at my graph again, Hillary.

Democrats control Congress = economic decline.

You still think the president has the power in America? Awww, that's cute! Do you start the 3rd grade next year, sweetie?

Incidentally, the worst years of Bush were with a Democratic Congress.

The best years of Clinton were with a Republican Congress.

Look it up.

I've already completely destroyed you but I'll put the nail in the coffin.

You claim that the u3 rate went down because MUH discouraged right wing retards can't find jobs.

That's because you're too stupid to know about the U4 rate.

It INCLUDES ALL DISCOURAGED workers.

It's 5.2%.

GG RETARD.

Republicans promised me Obamacare was a job killer.

They promised me an Obama Recession.

>says Obama saves us
>quotes a Congressional bill

You have no idea how American government works, do you.

Yeah the Obama stimulus.

Holy shit you're a fucking moron.

You have no fucking clue how things work do you?

Then why am I still NEET ever since he took office in 2008? WHERE ARE THE JOBS?

>create 14.6 million jobs
>let in 16 million legal immigrants (not even counting the millions of illegals)
Thanks Obama.

>A Canadian brutally shilling for Obama's failed policies

Why are you defending a politician you didn't vote for in a country you don't live in?

Btw
>If you troll them they win bro XD

I wish I had a real job. I'm only working 8 hours now.

>typical right wing retard

Great, its the leaf shill again with his bullshit graphs and charts trying to tell us Obama saved the economy and we should all be thankful or we are just racist xenophobes.

Can't wait for Trump to shut your Trudeau cuck ass up

ABSOLUTELY TRIGGERED

>"In the United States, a discouraged worker is defined as a person not in the labor force who wants and is available for a job and who has looked for work sometime in the past 12 months (or since the end of his or her last job if a job was held within the past 12 months), but who is not currently looking because of real or perceived poor employment prospects."

So the people who gave up 13 months ago or longer are not included in that statistic.

Ooops, Canada loses again. This is almost as embarrassing for you as the day you elected your new prime cuck.

Image: a reminder that Obama's projections and actions did not match reality.

That graph is federal debt as a percentage of GDP. It has nothing to do with how well the economy is doing. You can have lots of debt but a strong economy.

The graph also ends right in the middle of the Great Recession. It does not include the recovery, which took place after 2010.

kek

youtube.com/watch?v=PirVtiJuvDs

did u miss me?

a fucking leaf

When O'Leary wins the Cons leadership and becomes PM you won't be laughing then :^)

>massive lay offs from fortune 500 companies
>former employees are forced to obtain multiple jobs, each, to compensate
>job numbers double and triple

Quality over quantity, my friend. Our politicians are merely exploiting loop holes in the "numbers".

Also, the president has to sign any legislation passed by Congress. The president does, believe it or not, hold actual power in America.

Go back to elementary school.

>So the people who gave up 13 months ago or longer are not included in that statistic.

NOT INCLUDED IN THE U3 RATE YOU FUCKING MORON.

They're included in the U4. U4 INCLUDES ALL DISCOURAGED WORKERS.

Holy shit you're dumb.

You have no idea what U3, U4, U5 and U6 are, do you?

I'm screencapping all of this. You're fucking embarrassing yourself bro.

Btw how much of a fucking autistic right wing retard do you have to be to not look for a job after 13 months? I mean, seriously. Think of the right wing morons that you're fighting for.

Yeah, unchecked illegal immigration under Obama has decimated teen employment rates.

All the jobs teens uses to do are held my mamacitas from South America now.

fpbp. canuckistani btfo everytime

>posts a chart from 2011 showing the Obama recovery.

LOL

Lol you know Kevin Oleary is an American who calls Boston, TAXACHUSSETTS home right?

He's just pandering to right wing retard, like Trump.

It turns out Mr. Wonderful lives on Marlborough Street. The ‘meanest’ shark on ABC’s hit show Shark Tank talks venture investing, the Patriots, and why Boston is his favorite place to call home.

bostonmagazine.com/arts-entertainment/blog/2013/10/10/shark-tank-kevin-oleary-boston/

You type like you're on tumblr.

Government does not create job which contribute to the economy you dumb fuck they pay those people with tax payers money. They are not creating any new wealth for the country.

Ask spain how well a bloated civil service filled with a bunch of desk warmers that you cannot fire turned out.

I don't see him as a troll.

I see him as a chance to distribute some red pills.

I won't convince him but that's not the point. He's a lost cause. But there's always a few people on the fence and they can benefit from the counter-points.

(And look how unhinged that guy is. Always the sign of the truly blue-pilled. Reality is crashing around them and they feel it.)

dem flat lining jobs

Yeah ok bro. Look I know you hate America and love shitting on it.

But Obama job creation has been 95% full time and 60% of jobs created right now are paying over $26 per hour.

First of all, there appears to be an error in this graph. Anybody who is willing and able to work is counted as part of the labor force.

So it's basically impossible to "want a job but not be in the labor force" unless you're disabled, taking care of family, etc. and those already have their markings. I suppose the only way to fall into that category is to want a job but not actually look for one.

Secondly,you see all of these 16-30year olds taking care of family members (and not working)? Those people should be working, but they probably couldnt find a job and are living with their parents.

And finally, this graph obscures the truly important data. Several Key Points:

1. Of the people in the labor force, how many have jobs? (That's the unemployment rate)

2. Of the people who are employed, how many are part time and how many are full time? And you will notice that fulltime workers are getting replaced with prt-timers so that business can meet minority quotas, not pay benefits, etc.

3. Among those people who actually work, how many of them are working in a job they're overqualified for? Do we have engineers doing janitorial jobs because they can't find anything better?

If you take into account these questions and more, the overall picture of the economy is bleaker than the Obama worshippers make it out to be.

Ungreateful scum, for almost 8 years this man has lived in a same house with his mother in law for you!
Show some fucking respect!

Holy shit, an actual canadian Bongo shill thread. I thought they were a myth.

Who has the cap of all the thread this faggot started?

Actually Obama has deported more illegals than any other president and the teenage unemployment rate has fallen by nearly half on his watch.

It's higher than other rates cause they're in fucking school you retards.

>over $26 per hour
Citation needed

>But there's always a few people on the fence and they can benefit from the counter-points.
Like me. He BTFO you idiots every time.

Why can't any of you understand there is a difference between U3 (not including discouraged workers) and U4 (includes discouraged workers)? Every single one of you ignores this fact and you continue to spout Muh Discouraged Workers despite there being data WITH discouraged workers.

I type like I'm mocking right wing retards who do nothing but lie about and shit on their own country because they hate America more than anything.

>change the meaning of deportation to "sent away from border checkpoint"
>miraculously a larger number

That's what happens when everyone except right wing retards have jobs.

You need to understand what a "discouraged workers is".

What you think it means:
>Anyone who isn't working

What it actually means:
>Anyone who wants to work and has not worked within the last 12 months.

So, again, people who have given up and are not "marginally attached" to the work force are not included in any of the figures -- except for the "labor force participation rate".

Which is what I said in the start.

That's a fucking lie Gallup debunked since late 2014 "The Big Lie of 5 Percent Unemployment" Google it

>ended two wars
Yeah. Thanks for that, faggot. Now what the fuck are we supposed to do?

Not a cap, but a quick search in the archive shows this.

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/filename/Obama_based/type/op/

Here you go.

marketwatch.com/story/us-still-creating-plenty-of-good-paying-jobs-2016-04-20

PROTIP: THE PROBLEM WITH RIGHT WING RETARDS IS THAT YOU HAVE NO SKILLS

>income rates are lower
>consequently tax rates are lower
>lower tax rates are always a good thing

SAGE GOES IN ALL FIELDS

A FUCKING LEAF

AA
A

FUCKING
U
C
K
I
N
G

LEAF
E
A
F

GO SUCK TRUDEAUS COCK

Obama didn't change it you fucking moron. He was saying that's how it's been defined.

You tinfoil lunatics with your retard conspiracies.

no point arguing with him m8. the aspie just ignores anything that he can't shitpost against with a macvro. honestly thinking of making a script that auto filters all Canadian created threads

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009
You don't know as much about economics as you think you do.

Except you're completely wrong. There are only 600,000 discouraged right wing retards in the country who have left the labor force.

When you add them to the unemployed, you get the U4 rate which is 5.2%.

You think there are 94 million discouraged because you're a complete moron who thinks every 80 year old grandma in America is "discouraged". They're retired, retard.

This is probably the only thing you're fully right about Obama has been deporter in. Chief

raging leaf kek

Every BLS measure from U3 to U6 has fallen by half under Obama.

What part aren't you getting you fucking moron?

So does shillary pay you in American dollars, or Canadough?

Again, you and him are misunderstanding what U4 is measuring.

>U4: This is the official unemployment rate that is adjusted for discouraged workers.

What's a "discouraged worker"?

>Criteria to Be a Discouraged Worker
>The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics uses the following criteria in determining whether a worker is a discouraged worker.

>Not currently in the labor force
>Want work
>Available for work
>Looked for work in the past 12 months
>Have not searched for work in the past 4 weeks
>Not looking for work because they don't believe jobs are available for them or there are none for which they are qualified

So, again, if you have stopped looking for work, you are not a "discouraged worker". You are not counted in any unemployment figures.

FEAST UPON MY RED PILLS AND REJOICE.

I'm right about everything I have said here. I haven't been disproven once.

It's all the same shit from right wing retards who think 80 year old grandmas are unemployed and don't understand that when baby boomers retire THEY LEAVE THE LABOR FORCE

Dude get a life you post here like 16 hours a day and get BTFO every time.

he's right you know

And just to recap, Canada just got
BTFO
T
F
O

That felt good. That U4 figure was his major point and he was totally fucking around about the definition.

He can't recover from that. I'm gonna go get some lunch! Better luck next time, Hillary!

What other kind of discouraged worker do you think there is?

>>Not looking for work because they don't believe jobs are available for them or there are none for which they are qualified


Holy shit. There is no other kind of discouraged worker.

I know you right wing retards are autists but holy shit you are fucked up.

Your entire argument is based on the fact that you're trying to claim that there are so many right wing retards out there who can't find jobs who are so fucking retarded that they can't even look for a job. This is the typical Trump voter. Holy shit that's sad.

If you're a discouraged worker, you're a discouraged worker. There are no other discouraged workers.

JOB OPENINGS ARE ALL TIME HIGHS.

You're making excuses for the biggest right wing retards on the planet who can't even apply for a job?

Do you know how sad that is?

>Not looking for work because they don't believe jobs are available for them or there are none for which they are qualified
What's the difference between this and "stopped looking for work"? They are effectively the same thing. If there is a difference then how is it officially defined and what are the numbers for such?

How did I get BTFO?

Your only argument is that you're so fucking autistic that you can't apply for a job?

>>Not looking for work because they don't believe jobs are available for them or there are none for which they are qualified


There is no other kind of discouraged workers.

Seriously wtf is your conspiracy here?

shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts

>thirty two posts by this ID
what did he mean by this?

fuckin' saved.

I should have thought about looking up median income, too. That's a number that's hard to fuck around with.

Americans have gotten poorer under Obama. We never really recovered from the recession.

Hey dude, been meaning to ask; how do you say 'Twelve Months?'

He still hasn't explained once what my OP chart of job creation has to do with the CLFPR which is declining because of baby boomers retiring

You could at least say you miss me.

I see you right wing retards have no new arguments except MUH 80 year old grandma is unemployed.

>Unemployment rate only measures people looking for work. If you give up, you're not "unemployed". A lot of 2-income families are now 1-income since Obama.

This burger gets it
Anyone who disagrees with this statement has obviously never taken a Macro class
Students, disabled, and discouraged workers (neets), are not considered unemployed
frictional, structural, and cyclical unemployment is what is counted
frictional._moving job to job
structural._Why cant I get a job with my art history degree?
cyclical._ Economy has taken shit, come back later
Congrats, I have wasted my time explaining babies first econ class

The definition I posted came from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Read it again and understand why you have been wrong in this entire thread.

I even highlighted the important bits for you.

The definition you found on Wikipedia is, unfortunately, not what is used for U4.

>So, again, if you have stopped looking for work, you are not a "discouraged worker". You are not counted in any unemployment figures.

Uhhh...

>Not looking for work because they don't believe jobs are available for them or there are none for which they are qualified

That's exactly what that means.

Your entire conspiracy about the US economy revolves around your belief that you as a right wing retard are too fucking autistic to apply for a job.

I mean.. I can't even describe how sad that is.

Stop sucking your Queen's cock for a moment and read this gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx

brofist

I really do need to go get some lunch but reference this when he tries to talk to you about U4 measuring "discouraged workers". He literally does not know what that means and is using the wrong definition:
U4 does not measure people who quit looking. ("Discouraged workers" must at least still be searching for work. Official definition.)

>Not looking for work because they don't believe jobs are available for them or there are none for which they are qualified

This is exactly what a discouraged worker is.

You're claiming that they don't exist when your own BLS definition says they do.

Btw you do know job openings are at all time highs right?

Your only argument against the US economy is that right wing retards are so autistic, that they can't even apply for a job?

Do you know how fucking sad and pathetic that is.

>leafshill has no counter-argument
>"ARE YOU KIDDING ME XDDD"

>replying to the same post three (3) times
>calling anyone else autistic

I've read this already you retards. Holy shit you're dumb.

How many times do I have to say that all measures from U3 to U6 have been fallen by half under Obama?

When will you understand that?

Btw I love how the U3 rate was the REAL OFFICIAL rate for decades until a black man became president. Then suddenly it became FAKE.

What if the Republicans are actually the ones laying groundwork for it, and the benefits are only seen during Dem presidencies, because the Dems tear up the groundwork and the cycle starts again?