His dream will again become a reality. Germany is trying to oust PEGIDA because the Germans are again fighting foreigners terrorising their way of life and ruining their society AGAIN.
How many times will the lesson have to be learned that Germany is for the Germans?
Foreigners stay OUT we have no interests in becoming Jews and Muslims and we have no desire to house you for free while you infect our country with your disgusting sub human culture.
It's to late for us now I believe I only have the base of it but they are 3/4ths complete with their goal
As long as jannies get the gas chamber, I'm in. 4th Reich rising.
fuck of to /pol Arschloch
Verpiss dich, dummkopf
PEGIDA took a higher percentage in their first local election than NASDP took in their first local elections
>MGGA
Halt die Fresse Ronnie und verpiss dich.
Scheiss Wiedervereinigung war ein Fehler.
Ihr hättet einfach verrotten sollen in eurem Kackloch.
What if fascism and nationalism actually is the solution? Wouldn't the world be more safe and peaceful if society is separated by race, ethnicity ideology and religion but have those groups work together and not mixed together? History is repeating itself for a reason.
this guy gets it
but if everyone is getting along bc they aren't constantly stepping on each other how will [[they]] maintain [[their]] racial purity by setting us against each other?
borders aren´t natural, they are constructions.
your ideology is shit because it´s based upon the idea that some people are worth more than others.
most people who fall for it are somehow underprivileged or believe that they are victims in one way or another.
facism gives them something to feel good about themselves, like a national or racial identity.
that is basically nothing. stop being a little bitch and achieve something for yourself instead of relying on shit like: i´m worth something because i´m german or white or whatever.
Lol nice German you learned from a 60s TV show. Du Flasche.
They're some rankist faggots.
>your ideology is shit because it´s based upon the idea that some people are worth more than others.
no, it is based on the idea that everyone is of enough value to be allowed a place of their own
What do you mean with unnatural? Animals have their own territories.
International relations student here. Even if this is a troll
I would really like to for someone to make an intellectualy coherent case for nationalism and, eh, fascism.
Even if just in a devils advocate kind of take and really, really defend it with something else than erhbagherb prejudices. Never really ran into a real case in the current situation, unless economical protectionism is counted as a part of nationalism.
The world should be divided into monocultural communities for the "regular" people, with a few multicultural communities for those who can handle that sort of thing. I'd probably live in one of the multicultural communities myself, but I recognize that it's not the best thing for the vast majority of people and that we should stop trying to force it on the entire world.
Lol posting about Hitler on a website about sucking black dick
>we should stop trying to force it on the *entire* world
yeah
bc Africa, China, and Japan have such a problem being forced to take in foreigners
So like what is mosquito territory and what is rabbit territory? If autism was a monster truck rally you would be Bigfoot.
yeah
he didn't explicitly say SOME animals
so he obviously meant ALL animals
and rabbits' territories are their warrens
so good job on trying to set up a strawman and failing miserably
So they don't come out? Animals don't coexist? Where can I get whatever nimrodleaves you're smoking?
>fighting foreigners
>we
Nibba you are most likely a mutt and are only fighting your obesity
This about sums it up without all the speed larping
Except, fascism respects others sovereignty.
It values the people of the land over guests within it.
I've never met anyone committed to a strawman than you
no, animals rarely (I'm only saying rarely bc you are so stupid I need to be explicit) coexist
except for the rare symbiotic relationship
different animal species, and and in most species between social groups, at best ignore each other
and they always get violent when there is direct competition for resources
You coexist with spiders and you don't even realize it.
Sorry this doesn't actually really do much.
saying that fascism at it's core is asking the question "what is good for our nation" really applies to every last nation independent of whether they are fascist or not.
The whole text is more a rhetorical practise rather than anything else.
we don't coexist
bc we either aren't in close enough proximity to regularly interact
or we are and I burn them until they pop
Lol do you have a lock on your door or recognize personal property or are you a Marxist ideologue by chance? It’s pretty obvious to anyone who thinks about it that there is no way to reason with or have any sort of moral contract or interaction with someone that doesn’t recognize personal property or space. If the person you’re trying to interact with doesn’t recognize your sovereignty over your body or property or their own sovereignty there is no chance of any respect of any agreement and there is no predictability in interactions with them. You are not dealing with a sane person and should take caution as such. This applies to governments and countries and anyone claiming it’s all a fake and gay social construct is correct in a sense but also doesn’t recognize reality or morality in relation to personal property or sovereignty. Everything humans do is a social construct as we are social creatures, not recognizing property/borders is fucking retarded
Imagine if we’d just let germany alone and not forced them to destroy their culture and history, because of 20 years of their politics.
How exactly is economic liberalism at its core based on the health and well being of it’s people? It’s an economic system divorced from recognizing the people within its territory and does best creating atomized individual consumer units without any cultural or racial roots so as to break down any barriers to reaching maximum profits. If everyone is an individual with no ties to anything older etc then they base their identity on the consumer items they purchase and the subculture scenes tied to that. Communism is a purely economic model of seeing the entire world through a lease of capital and unequally and again is based on the idea of achieving equity through redistribution policy. They are stripped of any soul or higher purpose other than maximizing profits or maximizing equal distribution of capital
"...an economic system divorced from recognizing the people within its territory and does best creating atomized individual consumer units without any cultural or racial roots so as to break down any barriers to reaching maximum profits."
--> What does recognizing people within territry actually mean in practise in terms of internationa, law, domestic law etc.
-->second, claiming economic liberalism somehow eradicated cultural roots ties etc. what? why?
and then what are those roots actually in practise, etc.
* eradicates
At least try to make a full sentence.
Literally all of them claim to be the system which does the greatest good for the people living under it. So again, nothing more than rhetoric. Some would say that fascism can't be good for its people because, by necessity, a system that is good for its people must allow them free expression. Fascism does not. It limits expression harshly. So it's subjective, rhetoricical merry-go-rounding, it isn't what is best for everyone, just the opinion of the Fascists on what is best for everyone. Mechanically, fascism is totalitarianism designed to enforce morals and economic policy. Nazi Germany was NOT what was best for everyone, either, because it persecuted entire communities of people, German people. There were millions of Jews in Germany and it's neighbors, most of whom German citizens, who had been German citizens for generations; barely a tenth of them had the means to engage in business at all, let alone usury, but ALL were persecuted.
You do realize it was a correction to my own post?
Don't worry, commies will get the rope too.
History's biggest loser.
Nazi trash.
I guess when they invade Poland, France, Norway Belgium, the Netherlands, Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, that's respecting sovereignty?
You idiot.
Wie über “verpiss dich dummer Fotze”?
Aber ich bin nicht the user dass bist du antworten
You’re an idiot. What happened to England and France’s empires and colonies after fighting Germany even ONCE in the 1910’s?
Oh right, they lost them
Recognizing your own people and putting them first would relate to a protectionist type policy and basing all interactions with foreign people’s/country’s with the idea of maximizing the benefit to the native peoples of your nation and maintaining its collective individuality, culture and soul. It recognizes also the there is a diverse range of people’s that all have the right to sovereignty and their own collective methods of existing within the world and trying to create a homogenous global economic and governmental system is just a modern form of colonialism used to the advantage of a tiny group of elite vs the greater good of every collective group of people.
As for economic liberalism look at globalization, it is literally the end goal of it and how everything within the world is being used to the advantage of a tiny group of bankers, industrialists/ corporations and government elite to maximize their profits vs respecting their people’s hereditary rights of their lands and unique cultures. If you haven’t noticed all the mass immigration and the conflicts arising from the policy’s that could be a perfect example of the normal people recognizing their territory’s being invaded and the cultures being smashed apart through the mash up of trying to just dump whoever into economic regions to support the banking systems ponzi schemes. The elite just see people as economic units to borrow money against from international banks off their imagined future tax revenue and do not care one shred about the native people’s that have existed their for so long or their unique cultures they have generated. The breakdown of unique cultures destroys social cohesion and trust and ends up with the atomized individuals. The natives no longer trust the predictably of their society and the foreigners larp as their host country’s people while putting on their cultural costumes periodically to larp from where they came from
You think the current state of “freedom“ we believe we live in is any less authoritarian? The wast has the largest governments the world has ever seen, there is literally a concentration camp at Guantanamo to hold foreign threats to the state currently running no one bats an eye at and the government has a surveillance apparatus that would make any totalitarian from history step back in awe. Don’t forget the continuous foreign wars and regime changes sense ww2 and the endless war profiteering associated with that and the military industrial complex
They lost them after WWII, not the first war.
Moron.
Germany lost her colonies after surrendering in WWI.
do some research, you´ve got that wrong.
Thats pretty rich coming from Germany, considering its a completely artificial state.
The world will need tremendous trauma before something as obviously flawd as nazism wilo rise again.
Quit your little circle jerk and go talk to some real people.
That’s true, if you look into it India had a bunch of brown guys running around in wermach ss uniforms fighting the British colonialists and were pivotal to India’s independence. You think ghandi and a bunch of passivist religious people smashed the foreign empire ruling over them? Freedom comes from the end of a gun not hope and prayer
Well it is still occupied territory and ww2 was never officially declared over so there’s that. I don’t think they have a choice in the matter just like Japan
apart from the jew thing, today's germany has reached every goal hitler failed to achieve.
they reduced every population from Oder to the Russian border ( except belarus) to a state of total subordination. They are de facto Germany colony.
And the rest of Europe are forced to pay tribute to Germany through the UE.
In Germany the elites are whites, and the wageslave are people from other ethnicity ( eastern european or turk/arabs).
Then maybe you shouldn't have created the EU and mandated that millions of syrians and africans flood your boarderless socialist hellhole
>Germany
>colonies
Also why did France literally have no army after WW1? And not until after the second world war did they have one.
And england was on war rations well into the 1960’s.
These are the victors aye?
Hmm, so Aryans are the most superior race eh? Well Adolf Hitler said that the Japanese are Aryans too, but not the Italians for some reason, so....can the Japanese migrate to/from Germany whenever they please?
What about Asians? Are we not present in Germany? (I have no fucking clue) but even if we're in Germany, are we considered "slaves" by the almighty race of the gods? LMFAO
Really bad syntax, Yoda.
>I guess when they invade Poland
They invaded poland because the poles were governing stolen german land, and pogroming them.
>France
France declared war on Germany, Germany was defending itself rightfully so. They were also unbelieveably forgiving on the western front. The German military saw the English as brothers.
>Norway,
Britain and France were planning on invading Norway to steal resources. Germany did it to both save them from allied rape, and protect themselves from invasion. Again, England and France were the real aggressors here.
>Belgium
Had to to defeat France. Germany had no other choice and did what they had to do.
>the Netherlands
France was threatening to Invade them from day one. Germany again had to do it to secure their own lands and keep the allies from gaining a strategic state.
>Yugoslavia
Coup in the nation forced Germany's hand.
>The Soviet Union
The Soviets were readying to invade Germany. The campaign for Moscow was to protect the Germans. As the did this, they liberated people under the Soviet rule. You should read about what happened when the Soviets were given the territories that they stole back.
It all comes back to France.
turks are technically asian and they are the number 1 slave ethnicity in germany.
But if you're speaking about eastern asian, they own things like retail shop, and work long hour for shit pay. Their children are skilled and goes through uni, but they aren't the one ruling the country. CEO, Top politician, owner of big business are all white.
Nice dream
What, about America, was Germany counting on an American invasion the whole time, How did the Axis forces single-handedly get destroyed because of American intervention?
Germany declared war on America because Japan declared war on America.
Just like in WW1, when Germany was brought into war via an alliance, the German declaration of war on America was a blunder.
Germany not annihilating the British was the real mistake, it kept it as a two front war, allowing the soviets to regroup and push. That coupled with an American force on the west ended in tragedy.
Hope you get gangraped by the roaming Nafi gangs
> the Germans are again fighting foreigners terrorising their way of life
Seriously, motherfucker, did the Jews "terrorise" you in the 1930s?
Were you scared of bagels?
So what you're saying, is that the germans were acting like retards in the 1900's?
There was a Jewish communist revolution attempt in Germany with over 1 million people trying to overthrow the German government and expand the red empire. Many died fighting off the failed coup so ya maybe people had reasons to be pissed at jews there and then
Ok, so fascism first relates to a protectionist economic policy, so then, you do realize the downsides of a protectionist policy, for example technological exchange and the working culture exchange that have played a big part in making the modern international industries what they are?
"basing all interactions with foreign people’s/country’s with the idea of maximizing the benefit to the native peoples of your nation and maintaining its collective individuality, culture and soul"
Not sure again what manintaining collective individuality, culture and soul mean? how about the relation to the things mentioned before? Is importing technology and working cultures that make thing easier a form of not meaintining individuality? what is the culture and identity in practise that needs to be maintained?
Also what is the global governmental system? Can you be more specific Coming from Europe I understand the criticism made towards the EU, but on the flip side there are vast opportunities to participate in the common decision making,
EU is famous for making compromises when it comes to policies regarding the area. So saying something vague like global governmental system's goal is to smash cultures and make huge profits for the elite is a pretty low grain analysis of anything..
There are quite many vague statements that are made without any substantial proof.
Even the specific examples for example immigration, eh, I guess is an answer to the question what does it mean to recognize people in terms of international law? You didn't say specifically to what to do in the situation but I gather from the words "invasion" and "smashing culture" that the prolicy you would make in that case means no immigration?
Exactly, Jews were terrorists in Europe 100 years ago just like Muslims are today.
The word "maintain" seems to be hard one for me
Heil
Has Africa just been one long black on black genocide since it's entire existence, or, is their "situation" actually defined and written down, or remembered, somehow in the modern day?
They just fuck more and more and make millions of niglets their countries cant feed so they can kill eachother for limited resources
Definitely, when the only natural defense your continent has against invaders is out-breeding, sooner or later you just destroy the environment/ecosystem.
What, you expect them to rebuild their own countries? Heartless bastard.
Why is diversity only being pushed on white Western nations? Is diversity actually a strength? Do you feel safer with less cohesion? How much money is spent on diversity every year? This is something that would be interesting to know. I'm talking about; foundations, lobbies, affirmative action, advertising, etc.
