So Sup Forums, how do you feel knowing that when you absolutely need a cop to save your ass...

So Sup Forums, how do you feel knowing that when you absolutely need a cop to save your ass, they have no legal obligation to do so?

Knowing this, how can you still be against the legal ownership of private guns?

Attached: 1503741477956.jpg (482x477, 84K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lmgtfy.com/?q=who can't own guns in the united states&s=g
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>legal ownership of private guns
like every other shithole country

name another country that has such lax gun control. none do. and the US isnt a shit country you rube.

but you cant answer my question can you? didnt think so,

>name another country that has such lax gun control
you really don't see it, right?

>they have no legal obligation to do so

i don't think most people even know this one

>against the legal ownership of private guns

i think people just want guns to come with trails. the banana i buy at the grocery store is more traceable to origin and stops than a gun. and the beer i buy at the grocery store has more rigorous checks and balances in its purchase than the shotgun in my closet.

private ownership of guns won't solve that problem, NRA shill. go back to /k/ and jerk off over the Barrett Rifle.

guns are proof loaded, the company is liable for dangerous defects, and if buying from an ffl the owner must have a background check

>shooting the guy trying to kill you wont make him stop trying to kill you
k

>if buying

that's a pretty major if.

fake argument. this op will want it both ways though. he'll say cops can't be relied on to protect you so that will justify absolutely 0 barriers to gun ownership, but at the same time I guarantee that he privately supports existing and dramatically expanding police powers, with the current status as a standing military force that can wantonly kill people and destroy/steal private property for all sorts of victimless crimes.

Not OP but the people should have access to more effective arms than law enforcement and equally effective small arms to the military. Drugs should also be decriminalized and police powers and be held more accountable for unreasonable search and seizure.
Fuck pigs their job is to find things to fine you for and theres too many laws on the book as is.

true, but neither the bannana nor the beer are enshrined in a legal document for ownership and consumption like guns are.

and its not the governments business to know who owns a gun either given the fact that private gun ownership is meant to be the ultimate check on government power. its why the founders had no qualms about people owning gatlin guns, puckle guns and grape shot six pound cannons, we were to have the same armements available as professional armies.

Real men don’t need a gun

wrong you twit. the police and government should have their powers severly curtailed amd the police should have a legal obligation to save lives. try again.

in a perfect world yes. but this aint perfect.

the bad guys will always be bad because they have decided not to obey the laws. so until such a time, ill prefer to keep the ability to protect mine and myself from asshats who dont wanna follow the law.

>enshrined in a legal document

oh no, he still believes gun ownership is a right. how embarrassing are you?

in fairness, theres a lot of vocal thin blue line boomer fags that can give gun people that stereotype user. Theyre the first to shout they have a gun and the quickest to suck a blue cock after any kind of questionable law enforcing.
Free men types are more quiet.

slaves dont have rights user

gun grabbers of Sup Forums, here ya go

and after this, go google Warren Vs District of Columbia and then make your statements about no private guns.

Attached: 1521959663998.jpg (600x600, 82K)

Fair enough, that sounds reasonable

im not quiet, and i think the militarization of cops is a helluva bad thing. i have an uncle and two cousins who are cops and we are constantly butting heads over these things.

I live pretty far from the nearest town, meaning my only hope for rescue would be hoping a staty is near by. While it’s highly unlikely anyone would break into my house, a very much more real possibility is a bear or rabid animal. Really rather not have a single shot or handgun to deal with either of those.

the bill of rights is a legal document.

heller vs dc said gun ownership as a private individual is a right.

how the fuck are you able to breathe displaying such a lack of basic civics understanding?

thanks

Im happy for you that youre not. Hopefully things will change.
My outlook, thin blue line types seem to have guns because they want to have power like government and are normally statist. The opposite, also founders intent, was to have guns for power over government. If the cause is just enough, enough armed people will be there to accomplish that. I say free men but thats probably not the right word.

a right is something that cannot be taken away from you.

the second part, the founders intent, i agree with, well i agree with the first part too, but this post aint about that.

the founders meant for us little people to have military grade weaponry no matter what form it took. yes even javelin missles and tanks that go boom. they knew where guns were headed in terms of capability, they saw the puckle gun and the gatlin gun in action and did nothing to stop private citizens from owning them. hell it wasnt until th 1900's that we were told we couldnt have full auto guns. weird that it happened around the same time that FDR tried to make this a Socialist country

just like leftists trying to take the first away too huh? with "hate speech" laws.

rights are only retained by those who fight for them. freedom, sadly isnt free, you have to constantly be on gaurd against those who would strip you of your rights. its mans hubris to think that they can regulate and determine if you can say this or do that or own this or have this right.

in all truth, any law against gun ownership, from a traditionalist reading of the bill of rights is unconstitutional

gun ownership is not a right. it has not been for a long time. i understand that it may be hard to understand, tho.

>it has not been for a long time
because people who seek to limit your rights doesnt mean that it's not a right

Because I would rather see you die when a bigger runs lose in your home. Fuck 2a.

how so?

>seek to limit

they have sought. if you're going to use the "gun ownership is a right" argument than you would need to reinstate gun ownership as a right.

bad troll, no feeding time here.

i hope he comes see you first coward.

a fair trial is a right. epstein would have gotten a fair trial had he not been murdered.

lmgtfy.com/?q=who can't own guns in the united states&s=g

>traditionalist
If you were american, you would know why this argument was flawed.

Well stefan molyneux is an ideological piece of shit who lives in his own head so...

Attached: 1569960476111.jpg (720x606, 30K)

we need to reinstate the constitution