It was a different time

It was a different time.

Other urls found in this thread:

letterboxd.com/adjaniemwatson/
youtube.com/watch?v=t_JBVxGxyyc
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

harhar nice find

It was shit taste.

what do random letterboxd rankings have to do with jews in HP

The one on the right is truly 0/10 how much of a babby are you.

ayy

>he doesn't know about the time when letterboxd sent "users" here to discuss how good their new "pro" and "patron" options are
shiggy

Everyone was too busy thinking about it being one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Autism, I've seen it posted probably twenty thirty times. Dude is clearly upset about his shitty batb movie, he's a letterboxd pleb.

It was pure kino.

Why did you rank two films you didn't see?
Why do you keep making new accounts to like your own reviews?
letterboxd.com/adjaniemwatson/

Why do you pretend you have any taste and make horrible fucking grids, zach?

Why the fuck are you posting that /lit/ bait image. I get the pasta but it's got nothing to do with the bait.

Look at this autism. Imagine being this guy lmao

Because the entire thing is fucking bait this board can't discuss anything

>Beauty and the Beast (2017) 5 stars
>The Shining 5 stars
>The Bling Ring 5 stars
>Colonia 5 stars
>Brick 5 stars
>The Perks of Being a Wallflower 5 stars
hahaHAAHAH

Literal autism, like a true letterboxd pleb

>a fucking emma stone rate-a-thon
Oh my god HAHA

Things were just... different back then.

youtube.com/watch?v=t_JBVxGxyyc

Patrician taste for Sup Forums

was the floor like that in deahtly hallows?

The goblins remodelled the floor and workings

Ah yes, a building run by goblins and frequented by trolls.

Apparently the Australian High Commission in London was also used as a location in a Harry Potter film but I've never seen it.

damn you can actually see the cameltoe