Nailed it.
Nailed it
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
alright chile
Wrong, pol bragged about running the BLM blockade and also made memes about the nice attack.
whatever it takes to shift attention away from islam man, do your thing.
>my 72 virgins suicide faggot
>muh lets kill cops for criminals faggot
Which is worse
Also, these assholes aggressively put themselves into a situation where ther are antagonizing and even threatening drivers by banging on windows and kicking the cars. Fuck yeah I'll run over them. France was people minding their own fucking business with their families, friends, and children. I HATE liberals with their half-baked "profound" horseshit.
>blm faggots pretending that they want to get run over by cars and daring people to run them over, practically begging to get run over
vs
>people in the street for a festival doing their own thing and minding their own business
Liberals are fucking retarded. It takes balls to call out BLM on their bluff.
I would drive up slowly, so that they would get out of my way.
If they started getting aggressive and I feared for my safety, I would not hesitate to speed up.
Every single leftist on the face of the planet needs to be executed.
>people wanting others who are deliberately blocking traffic and impeding others to get the fuck out of the way is the same as a mass murderer running people over for a specific reason
The only thing these two occurrences have in common is people getting run over.
Completely different so not sure what his point is.
>IF YOU PISS ME OFF THEN FUCK YEAH ITS ALRIGHT TO MURDER YOU.
Go to the psych ward.
But niggers aren't people...
>All things involving cars, roads and people are the same.
Fucking dropped.
He absolutely nailed that morally-blind false equivalency!
kys
Liberal deflection and reducing my argument into some silly bullshit I didn't even say. This is why I hate you people.
It's not "pissing me off" you cocksucker. These animals have proven they are violent and don't give a fuck who they end up getting hurt or killed. I sure as fuck won't be one of them. And I hope your mincing faggot ass gets in that situation and are surrounded by these pavement apes, and see what you do.
Also, AMERICAN here who, by chance, happens to be black.
>BLM
>people
Nailed it.
>Angry Muslim hears about his relatives dying in the middle East, radicalizes and thinks he has to murder innocents to get back at the white people.
Evil sandnigger monster.
>White racist getting his road blocked by protesters who are also yelling at him.
RUN THEM ALL OVER FUCKING DISGUSTING NIGGERS ITS OK BECAUSE THEY ANNOYED ME.
I didn't know white people were murdering Tunisians.
You didn't either, in case you're confused.
Blocking a car can be seen as a mortal threat.
That thought would probably never cross your jewish, defective mind though, because you're too busy making false equivalencies, thinking about Moeshas' booties and who the fuck knows what else.
The French weren't being petulant children because some people with their skin color got shot doing stupid things.
You said that protestors saying mean things and kicking your car is grounds to kill them.
What you didn't say, was that them actually attacking you matters at all. All that they have to do is start shittalking and kick your car for murder to be acceptable.
>I'm black guys here silly stormfronters plz don't make me your token example of what NIGGERS SHOULD BE.
How it must feel to be a cuck to white people. How can you be so brainwashed to be befriend those who think you are literally an animal? They literally believe you are incapable of basic reasoning.
Somebody who actually has a twatter go link so peace truck memes at him.
Really simple.
If ur a human been. You can have relatives that don't live in da same country as you! Amazing that not all of your relatives have to live next to you, did you know that?
>Can be seen as a mortal threat.
I guess that black people can go on Sup Forums and see threads about killing niggers and feel afraid and could see those as mortal threats too, but we both know what really is.
>people wanting to pass judgement on criminals
>innocent people run over by sand niggers for fun
>how could people support the first but be against the second
Really makes me think.
this "argument" is an aborted fetus running down it's mother's thigh. You are nowhere near making a rational point.
This.
The life of Mr. McGunn and his ilk must really, really suck.
guessing isn't an argument.
What I said stands. And is why in certain cases running over a person is perfectly justified/legal.
>purposefully blocking traffic for gibs me dat
>enjoying a fireworks show with your family
Are niggers so stupid that they turn their white apologists into morons too?
>plowing through violent rioters who are detaining you on the road against your will is the same as pancaking 30 people on a closed-off section of road during a bastille day celebration
jesus christ, that context denial
There is a difference between bragging about plowing through a horde of terrorists and killing civilians
sage for taking the bait
That's right, I'm a fucking inconsistent dangerous psychopath and if you don't behave like a decent non criminal human being who knows when and where and who I'll choose when i SNAP
I wasnt "guessing" Its a pattern of speech, it means, I suppose. I know that you knew that.
What you said was that if someone kicks your car or says something ominous then go ahead and fucking murder them because you can tell the cops it was self defense.
When you go into semantics, the argument starts to detach from its originality, which is what happened here.
You knew my point was obviously that some peice of shit Muslim had detached from reality and subscribed to fanaticisim to commit an atrocity.
But you then said that it would be fine to do the same thing if someone was protesting in that same street.
and videos :D
youtube.com
So you're saying that a lot of Tunisians are being killed because they're part of ISIS?
:)
Put it this way. Life requires other life to perish, for it to thrive. By that token: a standing death warrant is out for each of you, given that you are co-inhabiting MY planet, and I need resources to survive. This is axiomatic, btw, and is unopinionated as to my mental state. It's not individual to me, it's just the state of affairs for any given human specimen -- if worse came to worse it'd be a duel to the death for one victor to come out ahead.
Now. I fucking dare you to attempt to detain me against my will when I am in my vehicle. Do we understand eachother, or were you too busy defecating on bodies in Nice, France?
Sage and dropped.
White, huh?
What a condescending cute little smiley.
Of course they are. Isis attracts all sorts of assholes. And any goatfucking peice of shit that joins them deserves a bullet.
The people on Nice were blocking the road on purpose. The poor Mohamed had to deliver ice cream. How dare they interrupt him.
Ohboyherewrego
Thank you for over explaining the concept of the morality of defending yourself. Im sure you feel smart.
But, that wasn't the point. You are still making the case that if you are "detained" "some one kicks your car" "or provokes you to hit them (obviously to prove them right)"
That's its perfectly fine to kill them, even though your life was never in danger, you were just delayed, annoyed, and those protestors happened to disagree with you. You said that it was ok to run them over which most often ends in death. Killing someone for "detaining" you, is murder.
Nobody is dueling with you, you overly dramatic faggot. Some angry black guy is complaining to the public about police shootings and he may or may not be correct. When he decides to try and attack you, or open your door, or surround your car, it is perfectly fine to run him over. But, you didn't say that. You said again, detain, kick car, or egg you on.
The "I'm done with you" pedantry is absolutely pathetic.
Of course it was condescending. You're being stupid.
As another example, calling something "murder" does make it murder, despite your feewings. The last person who ran down BLM and got off argued that they feared for their lives; thus, no murder or attempted murder. Self-defense.
No explain how a Tunisian angry because ISIS is being retaliated against is defending themselves from white people by running them down with a truck.
:)
>Faggots blocking highway for no fucking reason and getting runned over in consequence by frustrated drivers
>vs
>Crazed Islamists running over 80+ people, including children, just because they want to kill us.
Yes, what a fair comparison.
>Le "I'm correct because I'm ME" argument.
It's only not murder if you actually have a reason to feel threatened. You can't just say every tense situation is self defense, or else whenever the cops get assaulted, the blacks could say they were afraid that the cop was going to Shoot them and that's why they beat him up, because they were afraid for thier lives.
It's a disgusting lie that would make your blood boil. But you are still fine with calling a hit and run because someone "detained you" self defense.
>too stupid to tell the difference between apples and oranges.
Your analogy is intellectually dishonest to equate the two incidents, and you know better OP...you must be quite the twisted, manipulative snake.
>running over innocent frenchies for allah
>running over a stupid nigger who lives off our taxes and still doesnt feel equal
Pick one
>le "appeal to a fallacy I just invented" ploy
Actually, murder has a specific legal definition, thus my earlier reference to your feelings. If you kill someone and it's judged justified, you didn't commit murder.
If you're not on the jury, you don't get to decide whether I reasonably felt threatened or not, except in your heart...which has absolutely no meaning to anyone but you.
And yes, I'm fine with calling someone running over a BLM assailant or three, and escaping others, self-defense. It's not a disgusting lie, it's a logical conclusion given a certain situation.
Blacks don't have a special license to attack white people just because they're black. This lesson seems lost on BLM and their supporters, but I assure you, it will become more clear to you over time.
:)
I keep seeing this in the thread.
It's okay to kill them because they "frustrate" you?
No, you're the one brainwashing blacks by baiting them with implausible hypotheticals. Your crying and whingeing isn't going to help repair the incredibly fractured black community and it sure as fuck isn't helping to abate the growing antagonism between races in this country. Just shut the fuck up, you child.
go fuck yourself reddit
Islam says, terrorists blocking roads == people in a street festival. BTW the kek thing isn't just fags that got bored with lel, it's fag satanists and their ignorant tools who want pain and suffering because they're pathetic shitbags. Don't buy in, watch youtu.be
If you were given the sample information that someone ran over a protestor because he was frustrated that they were blocking the road, without racial information, you would not call it self defense.
Dude, shut up, your argument sucks and you lost.
No no no he got it wrong you see.
In the nice attack the truck drove into people.
In BLM protests people are jumping before the cars/trucks
There was an user explaining what to do in this situation, loosen the brakes turn off your engine and just let the car "Ride by itself" while holding horn all the time and just go like that, if any of them touch any of your windows or step onto your car you are free to go as fast as you can even if you kill few peoples on the way because then you are fearing for your life, when you drive like 100meters or so step out of the car and call the police explaining what just happen.
100% fool proof there is no way you will be charged with anything.
I can't do it myself as i'am not in the US right now but I'am counting on you anons.
>Assailant.
So as long as you give it the right definition its fine.
"Murder" or "driving through a group because they were blocking a road."
"Assailant" or "protestor who happened to be behind a violent protestor."
It's okay to kill them if you can legally get away with it.
No.
Fuck off
Your argument was much better.
Especially the part where you said, shut up you lose.
Because you can argue with pol about something they agree with and ever "win"
Yes I would you faggot. Protesters do not have a right to block highways.
>France attack
Everyday french citizens enjoying outdoor music, taking photos rtc
>BLM
Chimps who block highways and bust streets in the middle of the night, agitate passerbys, jump on people cars, and just in general act like fucking retards.
Here's hoping this white cuckold liberal faggot gets hit and run'd by a nigga.
Thats like comparing someone who got shot running into the middle of a gun range vs someone who got shot in their house.
Well it's actually because they are sub Saharans but ya basically.
>illegally shutting down traffic and generally being a nuisance
>watching fireworks in an area closed off by the city, an area that isn't a major thoroughfare
The faggots in example one are shutting down highways, more of them need to die.
You've literally just admitted that you are ok with killing someone because they blocked a highway, or a road.
Just an FYI, it's illegal in so many ways. Protestors don't have the right, but its unlawful to commit any action with a vehicle which will cause harm unless there are serious mitigating circumstances, such as an actual threat which is valid.
You've bacially admitted that its fine to murder people if they block the road and piss you off.
Actually, the racial information has nothing to do with it in the manner you're implying.
And yes, it's definitely ok to kill an assailant. "Getting away with it" is just justice.
Wonder what you think about this?
Huh... I am a #ShillForHill now.
On the other hand Chile-bro, if BLM was tactical and had foresight, they would use a bunch of nails welded together to make caltrops that would stop the cars from running them over. These people are literally just useful idiots though.
This explains things.
BLM supporters cannot separate fantasy from reality; Saying something and doing it.
It's this simple man.
1. The information said that there was someone in the road blocking the drivers way.
2. The driver ran this person over because he said he was "frustrated."
3.nobody said assailant. It's protestor and driver.
You still think it was fine to run him over?
Yes, get the fuck out of the road and quit being an asshole
Are you playing devils advocate? Or are you a nigger? Yes, if someone is banging on your car shouting, acting agressive or even jumping onto your car you have every right to floor it (obviously assuming no prior offense, car accident etc.)
God liberals are so dumb. You asked if given all the same information, except race of the protesters, if you would still call in self defense. The answer? yes, in the case when an angry mob is attacking some random person trying to cross a road, it is self defense to run them over.
Faggot, learn to debate. No wonder why no one takes any left-leaning person seriously.
Wtf now I hate trucks.
>1 post
Good job on the bait chile
I said assailant, because I don't agree with running people over because you're frustrated.
I think we might disagree where the line between frustration and threat begins, though.
Pic related was last weekend here.
>Every single westerner on the face of the planet needs to be executed.
t. Mohammed
>BLM supporters = people
Found their problem
>if someone kicks your car or says something ominous then go ahead and fucking murder them
i would not hesitate to run those idiotic niggers over in the street, i would not lose one second of sleep over wasting any of them, they are human parasites as far as I am concerned
according to his logic, the BLM protestors are also terrorists? lol good job retard
I'm not a liberal.
I said three things.
1.protestor in road.
2. Driver ran him over
3. He said he did it because he was frustrated.
That's it
>implying aggressive criminal niggers beating on your car and chipping out is the same as a bunch of transgender pansexual cheese eaters celebrating on closed streets on a national holiday
You're not white, are you?
It's perfectly fine to drive away from that scene, the protestors are out of bounds, but if you look at this fucking thread, people are sayinf they'd run people over and just not give a fuck. LookActively causing unnecessary harm when you are driving a car is assault and probably murder.
Wow it's a moron who nailed his head.
That's murder you fucking idiot.
From that example, and from what you said, that is fucking murder.
I feel like this really made me think.
>BLM protestors
>people
Needs more .jpeg
You literally chose the easiest of the 3 responses to reply too lmao.
Come on bro, respond to the other two.
I live in socal which is near LA, a major nigger nest. I have been in a couple severe traffic jams due to these apes, and it has me wondering Sup Forums. Should I find myself in the front line as they run out to block the traffic. If I kept going and did hit a few of them, what kind of legal trouble would I be looking at?
This is all I was trying to say.
The person in OPs pic is saying that people bragging and happy about running over people is just as disgusting as the terrorist running over people.
It's false equivalent of course, but the point is, that running someone over unnecessarily because you hate them is fucking murder.
So you pol fags that always say you wish you could be the one to run them over, you are hypocrites.
>in fear of life from imminent chimpout
>murderous rampage
and once again OP is a faggot
Nice Motive?
Like maybe to a higher gear?
I missed the part where you presented an argument
Just admit defeat its embarrassing for us to watch you sperg out with no skill or arguments at all
>This happened once so it will happen EVERY TIME
>Maybe a cop shot someone who didn't deserve it once but it doesn't happen EVERY TIME