Classic sci fi film

>classic sci fi film
>30% on Rotten Tomatoes

why?

rape

also jennifer lawrence isnt really that big of a draw

>Rape
When?

>rating a movie based on the "draw" of the actors and actresses

Feminazis believe since he woke her up their sex thus qualified as "rape"

not even making this shit up

What? She didn't consent to being woken up but she clearly and enthusiastically consented to the sex

critics do this all the time. if they like an actor, they are more likely to give it a higher rating

what do you think of jl body of work?

>notices problems in ship
>Only thinks to wake up engineers when the ship is falling apart and its too late
This movie was so dumb

>Feminazis believe since he woke her up

Elaborate please. What does this mean?

It's fucking real. This SJW bullshit poisons the RT scores, and then normies avoid it because of the score.

Femcunts believe since the sex was under false pretenses it was therefore not truly consensual.

Did you watch the movie? He was going insane from loneliness being the only one awake on the ship, so he woke her up, thus dooming her to her death on the ship too. Ergo any relationship they had after that was by definition non-consensual, so say feminists.

>Passengers
>Science Fiction
'no'

It's a drama with the backdrop of science fantasy, with two actors who aren't particularly good at dramatic acting.

>classic

write a 1,000 word treatise and/or seminar conclusively proving that this film isn't a classic. cite at least 3 peer reviewed sources.

Was under pretty creepy pretenses though desu. I'm not gonna call it rape but it's in a sketchy area where he heavily manipulated her.

>False/creepy pretenses
That's like saying any guy who keeps secrets from his gf is raping her. The consent is still there.

>from the writer who brought you Prometheus and Doctor Strange

>1000 words
>Only 3 peer reviewed sources
Wut

Because this film was utter shite

Was a pretty big secret. He selectively picked her out and then stranded her there with him.