We will never travel the space

We will never travel the space.

We will never travel the speed of light because mass can't travel the speed of light

We will all die on earth

Humanity only home Earth

WE ARE BASICALLY NOTHING BUT DUST IN SPACE.

ENJOY.

Other urls found in this thread:

nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/mag-portals.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I feel comforted that the human race will be obliterated.

This is why you need to go to church, user.

I wish I could believe in a religion, but i'm too far gone.

We can still create memes and send them via radio waves through space. Maybe some aliens want to share rare frogs with us.

Bitch, what?

40 years a filthy degenerate atheist then one day i found the lord . No one is to far gone

Same here, literally don't give a fuck what happens to humans. I'm just a living being in a human body.

>wormholes and FTL won't be discovered

stay optimistic

>Nothing but dust in space

All the more reason to fuck islam up

em drive gives me hope

If you can't be happy on Earth, space rocks aren't gonna do shit for you

Christcucks are the biggest degenerates

>implying we don't have space fleets and based on other planets
>who is Gary McKinnon

Then we start with the solar system. We can do that. Not in "many human lifetimes".

We can do that today. We have the technology, or the means to invest and develop our technology in the right direction.

We start with the solar system. A Solar Empire.

Then we look to the stars.

How can we be degenerate if morality is subjective user?

dS > 0

But how the fuck would you get to other stars. It's almost physically impossible. Enjoy waiting for 1000's of generations before getting to another sun. I wont be holding my breath

It would take one generation even with today's technology. Even hear of a solar sail?

We won't
Our robot decendants (or overlords) will

There is no heaven I don't want to go to it.

Not that I would ever deserve to.

>But how the fuck would you get to other stars

The main technological barrier is to get far enough away from the sun so that its gravitational pull is negligible. At that point we can go as fast as we like and will be able to explore the Milky Way.

One of the most promising ideas is space elevators which we will start with on earth and then leapfrog our way out of the solar system.

You mean after 40 years you just said to yourself: "nah man. Fuck all that logic and rational thoughts! I'm gonna go full retard from now on!"

Space is black. Who wants that anyway?

That is untrue

There isn't a chance in hell you're going 4.3 lightyears and unless our understanding of physics drastically changes we never will.

>At that point we can go as fast as we like

>implying this planet wasn't seeded by a superior race firing meteors packed with DNA
>implying we aren't already searching for futile planets and developing technology to allow our DNA to land, reproduce and evolve there

Have you even thought about this shit? Get on my level

*furtile

try again, azimov.

at least we have vidya

Robots are tools you superstitious ludite

In a world where good becomes evil and evil becomes good where nothing is logical anymore, i am going with full retard yes

that was uncalled for.

>logic and reason
>science and observation

reminder that if you believe kikesteins theories you are a good goy

That's true my polak friend.

...

Not only, the Earth is the only home of humanity but we are losing it to subhuman fecal skinned muslims and niggers that breed like rats. Soon there will be no home for mankind

...

When did you realize humanity and biological evolution is just a means to an end to create a technological race that can travel the stars?

Human flesh is not meant for space travel. We will either genetically modify ourselves or add technology as a part of our bodies.
All hail the cyborgs.

Carl Sagan was a subversive jew who used his position as Mr Science guy to push globalism and various marxist ideas.

...

>We will never travel the space.

We already are in space.

>We will never travel the speed of light because mass can't travel the speed of light


We don't need to. We simply move the space around us rather than travelling "through" it.

>We will all die on earth

Elon Musk will die on Mars.

>Humanity only home Earth

We already have a "home" in orbit, right now.

>WE ARE BASICALLY NOTHING BUT DUST IN SPACE.

We are all stardust.

>ENJOY.

I do, daily.

Nope soz. It requires exponentially more power to move faster the closer you get to lightspeed for anything with mass.

Better hope for discovery of warp fields, then we can get around that barrier.

that guy was a straight forward kick in the dick for me to stop smoking and drinking. i mean look at him. he looks beyond shitty i can only imagine how fucking horrible he actually felt in that picture

>needing FTL travel
>after we're done with quantum physics

buddy we have about 100-500 million years left before our own sun becomes too hot, we'll conquer the entire galaxy before that

we can deflect asteroids
we can deflect supernovae/gamma ray bursts

there are only three things that could extinct humanity right now

a vacuum metastability event
god
we wipe eachother out

>move the space around us

Britain will never be space relevant will it?

Billy no space britain

>we can deflect supernovae/gamma ray bursts
We can? How?

What is warp? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more.

Or, if you're a proud white person and not a fucking cuckold who bends over to the hottest new meme that comes out of the middle-east, you can believe in traditional European religions instead of worship a dead shitskin kike on a stick who's fairy tales were spread by kikes and nasty sandniggers who used violence, force, and fear tactics to convert Europe into a Christian caliphate.

>Britain will never be space relevant will it?

Google: "Skylon".

>we can deflect asteroids

Yeah those last two that relatively almost hit earth were only discovered a short moment before they passed.

>we

>before morality
>after morality

You're just some atoms bro. The only thing holding your body together is intermolecular forces. DNA forms spirals because the charges are incidentally held together that way. There's no mystery or intelligence behind it. The concept of something being solid is just two molecular forces opposing one another there's no actual "stuff" there. The solid objects you see are just empty space reflecting light waves which are just oscillating EM fields and photons. Everything is an illusion. Your brain is just an accident of physics. Even chemistry is just physics in action and Physics is temporary because the universe is expanding out at exponentially faster speeds towards complete dispersion of energy to as close to 0 as you can get without reaching it

Are you not part of Team Human?

We already do "travel the space".

We don't need to travel at c, we've already found localised wormholes:

nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/mag-portals.html

WE will all die on Earth, sure, but Mars will begin to be colonised within our lifetime and gradually we'll set up moon bases in the outer reaches of the solar system.

And yes, we're basically nothing but sentient dust but oh well, nothing mattered anyway, you haven't added any new information.

Death gets too close....

>we will never discover the entire earth
>where the earth ends ships fall into hell
>we will all die on this flat undiscovered earth
>we will never fly

>i dont like thinking about ideas that scare me so i will pretend to beleive in childish fantasies

>at any moment gravity could stop being a force

This scares me tbqh%

>Your brain is just an accident of physics

Are you denying your own Being?

Why would I be that random?

>We will never travel the speed of light because mass can't travel the speed of light

Mmm wrong.

Einstein told us that you can't accelerate mass up to the speed of light, however we do know that the stretching of space does allow mass to move relatively faster than light by stretching or compressing the space around it.

For example the end of the visible universe is the point at which mass is moving away from us faster than the speed of light becoming causally disconnected from us, due to the Hubble expansion of space between us and distant galaxies.

Theoretically this kind of space travel is plausible, whether or not we can ever engineer it is another question.

>Maybe some aliens want to share rare frogs with us.
Underrated post.

>I'll pretend I know everything scientists tell me as fact

Tell this to the commies and kikes, so we can start killing them without them complaining much.

>believe in a religion
religion is just a practice.

what you're supposed to believe in is a savior, outside yourself.

But user the whole galaxy is our birthright, and it is the Emperors will that we take it.

I got your being right here senpai

We would just float around, gravity reversal is terrifying.

...

but we can just turn the atoms off

check thoose doubles in my IP

No, we literally don't know that.

What you're talking about are Lorentz contractions and dilation.

When you move quickly, time slows down for you, and length contracts. The reason for this, is that the speed of light is an upper limit you simply cannot reach.

If I have a fighter jet travelling at 300m/s and it fires a rocket at 600m/s, that rocket is moving at 900m/s, right?

But if I have a fighter jet travelling at 300m/s and it fires a laser at the speed of light, the laser goes at the speed of light, not at (300+the speed of light).

So whenever you are moving, time and space distorts around you to ensure that you can't move past the speed of light.

So what this means is, yes, if we go very very fast, time will almost stand still for us, and space will shrink for us, so we can go really fast. But never faster than light. And it gets eventually harder and harder to accelerate as our mass would increase to make our inertia larger so we couldn't accelerate.

Also, the main problem is, rate of change of acceleration (jerk) kills you if it's too high. So even if we were to go super fucking fast we'd have to accelerate really slowly for a very long period then decelerate for a really long period too, otherwise we'd die in the process.

Chat shit get banged.

ive never said that. having blind faith in anything isnt good.

I don't want to go to space, those videos from that Canadian astronaut make it look very uncomfortable, he's always red faced and looks like he has a headache. Space is a hostile alien world where the survival rate is absurdly low. We simply don't know how to live properly there yet.

>we

Why do atheists keep pretending they're scientists

You don't know 1% of 1% of how mainstream scientific theories work and what the evidence for them is

A Muslim has less faith in the Quran than you pseudoscientists

I should also add, you are essentially always moving at the speed of light, and that's distributed between spatial dimensions and time.

So if I move at the speed of light through space, I don't move through time at all. Photons do not age.

And if I do not move at all through space, I move at the speed of light through time, in other words I age at about the rate we're used to since we don't move very much.

So, basically, gotta go fast.

>we wuz scientist and shit

you can see a supernova coming before it happens, since we can observe stars and roughly tell when they're about to explode , let's say a sun is about to explode 50 lightyears away from us, and we know that about 70-80 years before it happens, I'm sure we'll figure something out

no we didn't, we knew about these asteroids long before that, the one that hit russia we never detected because it was a: a medium sized asteroid; b: before it hit, it was aligned with the sun from our viewpoint, we weren't able to see it because of that, and NASA took steps to prevent this from happening in the future afaik

good kek
even blessed with those dubs.

Just get a kid on a hill with a baseball bat

Different user here, but I have a physics degree and I understand everything I really get in an argument about to the level that the arguments reach (since normally it's with christians with no scientific knowledge who can only barely scrape the surface anyway).

But the entire point is, we don't NEED to know every theory, because of the scientific method. You know from peer review and scientific rigour of using thousands of results, correlating, finding a result with an error on it, that those results are almost certainly correct.

I don't have to be at CERN colliding particles to know that a 5 sigma result on finding the Higgs Boson is statistically significant enough to accept it as truth.

Science is belief, but it's belief in the principle of induction, and it demonstrably works - planes fly, rockets go to space, medicine cures people, the national grid works, computers, internet etc. work, and they're all based off the scientific method, so demonstrably it works.

On top of that, if we didn't believe in induction, we may as well just roll around on the ground dribbling and squirming in a foetal position in a pile of our own shit, because if you don't believe in induction, that means you can't believe in any kind of acquired knowledge at all. You can't believe in language, maths, literally anything, you'd just be a ball of writhing flesh at the point you aren't willing to accept induction.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction

It's the one facet upon which everything we know is built.

just a reminder that you are on a large mineralized sphere that is already traveling through space, and, relative to other objects, moving at the speed of light

i though danes were smarter

>let's say a sun is about to explode 50 lightyears away from us, and we know that about 70-80 years before it happens

N'WAH ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS.

IF IT'S 50 LIGHTYEARS AWAY FROM US.

THEN IT TOOK 50 YEARS FOR THE LIGHT TO GET TO US.

SO IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR US TO KNOW THAT 70 YEARS BEFORE IT HAPPENS, BECAUSE THE LIGHT HASN'T REACHED US YET.

Get out of the thread.

youre right i dont and i have never claimed to properly understand them. all i know is that they do work.

religins however do jack shit. you cant pray a for a computer to suddenly materialise out of thin air, you cant pray for somebody to be cured of disease. these things have to be imagined and created by people so i place my faith in science rather than anything else because i see it in work every day

I'll respond to you in a bit

I just have to ask you first do you think a bachelor degree makes you a scientist?

You are a filthy xeno shill.
Get the fuck out of our planet, you spacenigger.

Space is really fucking boring. Who cares

>relative to other objects, moving at the speed of light

what is the theory of relativity?

goddamn murica

>all i know is that they do work.

How would you know that "they work" if you don't even know what works in the first place?

Popscience is just scratching the surface of scientific understanding and Internet documentaries aren't gonna do shit for you

Time is not a problem for machines though

Just like the Earth was flat right?
Just like breaking the Sound Barrier would kill you right?
Just like every goddamn thing you take for granted today was once impossible. We'll figure out a way around it eventually, I have faith.

So, I moved out of science and into a different field that has more money and women, but my Russell Group MPhys makes me literally qualified to speak on the topics I'm talking about, yes.

I give the occasional lecture on advanced dynamics and computational physics too because it coincides with my field.

My dissertation was on GPS/INS so this conversation about entry level special relativity is way below my level of expertise, and I specialised in nuclear and particle physics, and dynamics and computational physics. I would still get in an argument about entry level quantum physics. I probs wouldn't get in an argument about electromagnetism. I also studied physics & philosophy.

I mean, at what point am I qualified to talk about something that I know, when I have a Nobel prize in it?

>to accept it as truth.
you mean to accept it as a valid theorem, or law, therefore a basis for more theorems, or laws. a working and workable result, upon which we might build new technology and do wonderful things for mankind.

but not truth, because that is not what truth is -- which you would know if you also studied theology.

>Different user here, but I have a physics degree and I understand everything I really get in an argument about to the level that the arguments reach

All you would understand is Bachelor-level Physics

>But the entire point is, we don't NEED to know every theory, because of the scientific method.
>You know from peer review and scientific rigour of using thousands of results, correlating, finding a result with an error on it, that those results are almost certainly correct.

Basically you're content with scientists doing most of the thinking for you.

Good for you user. But don't pretend you understand what you have not studied

>I don't have to be at CERN colliding particles to know that a 5 sigma result on finding the Higgs Boson is statistically significant enough to accept it as truth.

It's worthless what you know if you do not understand why that it the case

>Science is belief, but it's belief in the principle of induction, and it demonstrably works - planes fly, rockets go to space, medicine cures people, the national grid works, computers, internet etc. work, and they're all based off the scientific method, so demonstrably it works.

Induction can only be demonstrated with logic and mathematics. Don't get your hopes up

[1]