Color grading

why is this shit allowed

Other urls found in this thread:

slashfilm.com/zack-snyder-george-washington-movie/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It makes people of different skin colors stand out less and the jews want this so they can make every pairing multiracial.

>he doesn't like snyder

I wish they just let colors shine bright like they did in the 80s.

It works in O Brother Where Art Thou and The Matrix. They need to stop using this shit in regular movies though.

looks shite mate

pleb

fuck off

>leaving white colored white and not blue/green/teal
What did Kurosawa mean by this

I remember watching Fresh Prince of Bel-Air and everyone (both black and white) seemed darker-skinned than was natural. Was I imagining that?

because modern cinema is garbage. Only Tarantino can save us

Have you ever seen any of his flicks?

redpill me on color grading

which is the orignal, top or bottom?

Wait, he makes movies?

Yeah and they look warm and natural. He also shoots on film and not digitial. Quentin is based

I would like to know this, as well. To my eyes, the second frame looks better.

Seriously though, why is this good or bad?

...

top is original

bottom is corrected

Top looks better.

Then, I guess I like color correction a lot.

...

Bright colors only look good in static frames. In 23.whatever frames per second they look choppy and distracting, and even worse in action scenes.

>iq
>63

>Bright colors only look good in static frames. In 23.whatever frames per second they look choppy and distracting, and even worse in action scenes.

Some of those frames look trippy as fuck. Those reds, specifically.

What exactly is the problem with what i said, autismos?

>23.whatever frames per second
Just say 24fps, and the rest of your comment was just as dumb.

I really like the one with the 2 samurai kneeling to the old samurai.

hey im watching this right now

What do you think of the rape scene?

lemaskusumin

Holllyyy shit. This guy.

Every movie in the history of color movies has been changed to look a certain way in post production.

Top is original in that it is the final product with a color corrective grade applied to it. The bottom is "corrected" by a fan to have more natural lighting and coloration.

you mean when alejandro rapes guillermo?

we should make all the old technicolor films green

Why is it that poor color grading like the MCU movies look like they have a grey film over them? Is it because there is less saturation, so all the colors on screen are more similar to each other?

>MCU movies

>my hands are dirty
>so is my suit

nice, the saturation of the bottom pic is totally natural

more like flicks

WELL MAYBE BECAUSE MOVIES WERE SHOT IN FILM BACK IN THE 80's YOU FUCKING MORON

Literally the most color graded scene in any film, DCEU or MCU. This scene bothers me more than it should.

I think it is you who is being the moron effendi.

It doesn't matter why they did that. I'm just saying movies looked better this way.

This was shot on film, but we never had access to the film negative until recently -- which revealed that De Palma and Vilmos Zsigmond anticipated current film fashion by three decades.

This looks pretty good.

FIX THE COLOR GRADING RIDLEY SCOTT!

...

I tried

...

Low lighting. Like in seinfeld

I love seeing Henrey Cavil smile as Superman. It resembles the role he SHOULD HAVE played instead of the psychopath role he ended up doing in MoS where he hardly saved anyone apart from 1 soldier during his fight with Zod.

i have no problem with this. it looks like a shitty winter day. cinematography is never a problem in ridley scott movies.

wtf? i hate snyder now

...

Looks like gay sex in the ass

Tell that to
Z O D S
S N A P P E D
N E C K

Did he colorgraded her?

THis one actually looks fine, but I can't expect Sup Forums top be able to tell the difference between good color grading and bad color grading.

The problem with the one on the top is that it looks too much like Vancouver.

IF you use color correction to create visuals that don't exist at your location, you can disguise a city.

all this has done is change how the lighting in the room looks.
Top is how a dimly lit room looks

>dimly lit room
>huge lighting fixtures reflected in the glass

You just don;t understand the art of kinõgraphé OP

DePalma is genuinely underappreciated.

What a visionary. Truly the herald of Snyder.

I like the color in the top more, but it looks slightly too dark and lacks contrast.

>he's never seen blue-green snow in broad daylight
get out of your mom's basement, you nred

This is bullshit. I have the bluray and it looks normal.

Here's my take on it, i made it similar to yours but I adjusted it so the shadows of his face aren't so dark, and his normal skin tone doesn't shout out like a old Technicolor movie.

Supposedly the first wave of EE BDs for Fellowship were color graded to hell and back and they toned it down in subsequent shipments but it's still a little greenified compared to the original.

>Meanwhile, Snyder is spending late nights in his cavernous office working on the upcoming Justice League movie. He’s also thinking about making films that aren’t comic book adaptations. Sort of. One of these days, he’d like to make one about George Washington in the style of 300. He has a picture in his office of the Revolutionary War hero crossing the icy Delaware on his way to decimate the British in the Battle of Trenton. “We were talking about it,” Snyder says. “The first thing we asked was, well, how are we going to make it look? I pointed at this painting. It looks like 300. It’s not that hard.”
>It's not that hard

slashfilm.com/zack-snyder-george-washington-movie/

Why do they even do it? Why would the goal not be to preserve the original film as shown in theaters rather than to put dumbass filters over it?

Ask George Lucus

At least I can understand that George Lucas was trying to add content to Star Wars that he supposedly originally wanted in there, misguided and retarded though it was. I just don't even get the purpose of a blue filter over a movie. Just... why?

...

GIVE THIS MAN AN OSCAR

WHAT A VISIONARY, WHAT PROVOCATIVE COMMENTARY, WHAT STYLISTIC CONTROL

...

...

I guess whoever was doing the color timing on that version just thought that adding a blue filter would make it 'colder'.

Is this a test for the Criterion Collection version?

Even Shin Godzilla has a terrible green over saturation

film is objectively the best way to make movies
>can be rescanned into digital at higher resolutions later (star trek)
>lasts longer
>colors are better

FIXED

now you went and oversaturated it

not an argument
not an argument

If only I was getting paid to do it.

>people who have never shot anything in their life, or know how light interacts with real world objects, or how color works, """"grade"""" movies

You're an embarrassment, OP. You will never work in the film industry, because you have absolutely no idea how any of this works, so stop making these threads.

>interracial relationship is now "color grading"
Im on to you, you fucking racists. Its 2017, get over it!

nice trips
I tried but I couldn't get it right but I did my best to get the red to pop out a little more.

This. I wouldn't be surprised if OP, and the faggots ITT like him, was the kind of retard that actually thinks HDR images look good.

uh, stop it. you don't understand how light interacts with giant monsters

>i have no idea how color and light works
>but i'm still going to shitpost and meme about it because i'm a smug little shit and i think i know better than the people who work as industry professionals

Tell that to the japs that made the film.

nice argument from authority. fyi teal coloring still looks like shit

How are audiences supposed to know what emotion to feel if we don't color grade?

It can sometimes add to a movie, but I feel like everyone just way overdo it now.

I hate seeing Cavill in interviews for this reason. He would be perfect for role if he had better direction.

Light interacts with objects making them green. I know this from my Green Lantern comic books.