I remember when Bubba got impeached for breaking the law and he didn't have to leave office, or go to jail when his term was over. Why would I think impeachment will be any different this time around?
I remember when Bubba got impeached for breaking the law and he didn't have to leave office...
Other urls found in this thread:
politico.com
law.columbia.edu
nbcnews.com
independent.co.uk
axios.com
twitter.com
Because this time the "crime" wasn't lying about some private affair?
impeachment and impeachment HEARINGS are two different things, Bill never got the majority vote needed to boot him
The Democrats won't impeach because in the Senate they have no control and can't run the one sided Kangaroo court with hearsay and bullshit they have been running inSchiff's basement
In the Senate the Democrats will be the ones on trial , they are desperately hoping for a way to back out of what has turned out to be a disaster for them
>"crime"
like a president lying to a grand jury isn't a real crime
I like how you didn't try to claim that this president didn't break any laws, user.
During the hearing , Jim Jordan asked Schiff and the other Demon_rats exactly what law Trump broke - nobody could give him an answer.
Please tell us exactly what law he broke , the Demon_rats on the the inquiry panel need to know
What lie was that , user - and when did Trump testify to a grand jury?
Bubba did get impeached by the House of Representatives for breaking the law just like Trump is about to do, but he didn't have to leave office because his party had a majority in the Senate. Trump won't go to jail because Americans don't believe in jailing presidents for breaking laws. No difference.
What law did he break , user?
>when did Trump testify to a grand jury
nobody claimed that he did
Ok, so you were talking about Bill, the regular commuter on the Lolita express.Understood.
2. Ammendment
he who? Bill lied to a grand jury which is illegal, and Trump ordered his subordinates to withhold aid that Congress had approved for Ukraine which is illegal. If you don't follow breaking developments, why are you reading this thread?
And 3.Some Bullshit We are Just Imaging Law
The Democrats know the "news media" in the US are just bottom ffeding trash eaters.They can throw any garbage into the water and the Press will still go into a feeding frenzy.
>Trump ordered his subordinates to withhold aid that Congress had approved for Ukraine which is illegal
He didn't and it isn't.Stop making up bullshit. - or else cite the Statute or provision in the Constitution which supports your statement
>the Demon_rats
autism
The asshole factor is X 1000.
>it's ok to abuse your Presidential powers
lol trumpshit
Let's review and compare.
Bubba got impeached for lying about a consensual blowjob he received from another adult AFTER the investigations of him began.
Tiny Hands solicited election assistance from a foreign power and threatened to withhold critical foreign aid if they didn't come through.
One of those officials, a lawyer, stepped down over concerns that the hold was violating the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which sharply curbs the executive branch’s authority to alter congressionally appropriated funds;
politico.com
I don't need to make up bullshit, user. I'm not a Trump supporter.
He delayed the funds with intention of getting dirt on a political opponent. For "delayed" read "with held." Money that was approved with bi-partisan consent for the defense of an ally. He had no right to use it for his own political purposes.
It constituted a bribe. Which is also illegal? (Rod Blagojevich is still serving time for just this crime).
It was soliciting the aide of a foreign government against a political opponent. Which is also a crime.
So your reponse is to shit on a logical comment? Provide the statute or provision or stfu and kys retard.
You do know that Ukraine and the USA have a treaty entitling them to investigate crimes committed by their citizens in their respective countries - no, probably you don't
How is investigating corruption and bribery by US ciizens an abuse of Presidential powers , especially when that imbecile Biden is on video bragging about getting a prosecutor ( who was investigating his son) fired by threatening to withhold aid......
>you shut up yes it's ok for the President to abuse his powers
Not that user. Just watching you protect that fucking crook lol.
>Challenges someones logic
>Says Pres don did nuffin wrong
>Ignores all the mounting evidence
>you do know that it's OK for Trump to be a crooked President
you're right I didn't know that
>Biden
any mention of him is evidence of Trump's guilt
"Getting dirt" - that's a strange expression for investigating a crime - just because somebody may at some stage win the nomination for candidate does not render them immune to investigation or criminal prosecution
>It was soliciting the aide of a foreign government against a political opponent. Which is also a crime.
The Ukraine and the US have a treaty allowing them to conduct and render aid to investigations of criminal offences committed by each others citizens.So it's not.
§201
is this what they teach in schools anymore? were you a victim of the 'no child left behind' law?
>imbecile Biden is on video bragging about getting a prosecutor
The whole of the western world - governments, the IMF, The World Bank and more wanted that corrupt prosecutor gone.
> investigating corruption and bribery
Then why did he not get involved in fighting corruption in the rest of world? Was it because he got involved in the Ukraine ON THE VERY DAY Biden announces?
I think Candace Owen summed it up perfectly:
"if you believed the Russian Collusion hoax and you now believe the Ukraine hoax , its not your fault! Defintely not , intelligence is largely hereditary and it's not your fault if you didn't inherit any"
Not that user, but why are we even defending Biden? This is the game Trumpers stoop to, and talking about their President, who was too big of a PUSSY to face Biden in the General Election if he gets nominated.
its to save Biden the embarrassment
>Russian Collusion hoax
>Ukraine Hoax
>Candace Owen
autism
>a treaty allowing them to conduct and render aid to investigations of criminal offences committed by each others citizens
If this was at the core of the issue then why was it not done through the official established channels of government?
Why was it undertaken by people like Giuliani (who is not part of the government and is only Trump's personal lawyer)?
Why was it undertaken by Nunes - politician! Why did Nunes go to the Brits to speak to their intelligence agencies (who wisely refused to meet that moron)?
Why did Nunes visit that oligarch in Austria who is fighting extradition to the US and was funding those two Ukrainian stooges of Giuliani who traveled the US trying to buy Republican politicians?
Why was the President personally involved in this case?
Nope, the Ukraine got their aid without any investigation being required.No mention of withholding aid was made to them.It was a request under a mutual assistance treaty to investigate the corruption of an American politician and his son extorting monies from other countries in exchange for influenc and US aid
>The whole of the western world - governments, the IMF, The World Bank and more wanted that corrupt prosecutor gone.
Citation needed - the prosecutor was investigating Hunter Biden, that's all we need to know
>Then why did he not get involved in fighting corruption in the rest of world?
Barr and Durham, they are travelling the world conducting investigations and December 8 is when the reports are due to be made public, that's why the Democrats are shiitng themselves
Also - Trump has good reason to want Biden to be his opponent - the man has advanced dementia, is a walking gaffe machine and will easily be trounced in debates, the investigation had nothing to do with his candidacy
Bernie Sanders is the only Democrat who might have a chance against Trump and so far as I know there are no investigations ongoing against him at this time
>black conservative
>states intelligence is hereditary
>is black therefore low IQ
Does that negate the statement?
Why , why why... why not?
Perhaps because he inherited a government filled with Democrat holdovers who would conspire,leak and undermine him at every turn , and needed people he could trust to deliver instead of leak and cover up ..Vindeman ,cough, cough, Mcabe, Comey etc
Blacks are low IQ ? You shills need to get your supervisors to provide you with better talking points?
How much are they paying you in Shill Central? And is it rubles or yuan? Asking for a friend.
I get your point. I don't like Biden. Just another establishment, status quo, slave to corporate. Just like Schumer, Pelosi, the DNC and all of the Republicans.
But I will speak of Biden's Ukraine corruption with his son JUST AS SOON some puts out evidence. Today the only sources have been from Russian backed, depose Ukrainians push the Moscow crafted narrative that it really was the Ukraine that meddled in the 2016 elections. They managed to get pass that narrative on the Trump and his people who just started salivating.
Ok user. I'm sorry
If he did, there's scant evidence. And evidence is required. t.Not a Trump supporter.
I didnt mean to make you mad. Here's sat scores since iq isnt everything
To all who think that Trump NEEDED dirt on Biden, you are dumb as shit because you were not paying any attention under Obama administration. Please don't pretend to be Constitutional scholars either, you are not.
Because Bill wasnt being used to distract the masses for more sinister happenings.
Like extending the patriot act
>filled with Democrat holdovers
You really need to read more.
Especially about the transition. There were fewer holdovers than normal in a transition. And those left found that the new Trump appointed guys were ignorant as fuck, did not want to learn how to learn, and often did not even turn up to work.
So many holdovers just turned in their notices.
They did tap our phones and shit with NSA right?
Or was that a fever dream
I wish people didn't take this stance in bad faith. They assume that ANY speaking out against Trump means that you take the opposite stance. I'm pretty sure nobody here is for Biden.
Hell, I -wish- Trump had found something to take Biden out of the race, but I'm not going to let my opinion against Biden get in the way of the facts. Ukraine says that Hunter Biden broke no laws, Republicans even sent letters to Ukraine to oust the corrupt investigator which just lends credibility to Biden being sent to handle the job that many nations were wanting done and so on and so on.
Your graph does not establish that a particular Black person is of ow IQ just because many others of the same race are , nor that the person we are discussing( Candace Owen) is of low intelligence - that's why I said it was a very weak argument
>To all who think that Trump NEEDED dirt on Biden
Biden is a moron and a walking gaffe machine, Trump would love to be facing him in the debates, Bernie Sanders not so much
There really is no difference between Bush and Obama and Clinton, they were all pushing us off a cliff, in case anybody really bothers to pay attention.
They all share common genetics. That's why they are the same race. If the average iq of a race is retarded, then it's a safe assumption most are.
She reads from a teleprompter with ideas from someone else's head. She's no more than a token black person because "muh diversity"
Bubba didn't get impeached for breaking the law. He got impeached for believing that fellatio is not sexual relations.
Spoiler alert: This was also the belief of the majority of the US at the time. Back in those days, fellatio was just foreplay.
Somebody doesn't know what IQ is.
>Hell, I -wish- Trump had found something to take Biden out of the race
Which would still have been the same abuse of power
“There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party … and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat. Republicans are a bit stupider, more rigid, more doctrinaire in their laissez-faire capitalism than the Democrats, who are cuter, prettier, a bit more corrupt — until recently … and more willing than the Republicans to make small adjustments when the poor, the black, the anti-imperialists get out of hand. But, essentially, there is no difference between the two parties.”
― Gore Vidal
Please enlighten me professor
Don't worry, Bernie isn't going to get the nomination. He is bourgeois afterall. I really don't understand why no one has called him as such, I guess there are no REAL socialist in America
Read and enjoy
I have no experience in construction, can I get a $1.5 billion housing contract from the Government?
I have no experience in Energy, please give me a $50,000 a month job with your energy company and $12 million dollars in bonuses over time
Next time I go to China, please have $1.5 billion ready for my "investment fund"
Please.
Google is your friend. Stop being intellectually lazy.
>Why would I think impeachment will be any different this time around?
Because the two incidents have almost nothing in common beyond being impeachment hearings.
Basically Democrats had the numbers to block impeachment and didn't really care about the lie very much, neither did the public so even moderate Republicans and many Republican votyers weren't that fussed about it since lying about your private life was seen as "understandable" and forgivable.
The question is whether the public will see Trump's call as extorting a foreign country into attacking your rival for you and whether the public will understand and forgive that, and whether republicans in house/senate will follow the public's opinion as polled, or take the electoral hit and support a republican president no matter what.
There's probably a bunch of republicans asking themselves whether Pence would be a better behaved establishment Republican president and separately, whether he has the stature to defeat Sanders or latina chick next time.
a bit stupider?
I'm not being lazy. You need to defend your position. You made a claim saying I dont know something, so how did you get to the conclusion?
That's the thing though. If Trump DID find dirt on Biden the same way, it would have taken them both out since Trump did so in an illegal way. Win win!
Funnily enough, if there was a legitimate reason to have Biden looked into, there were many different official channels that Trump could have gone too and had them look into things. Sure the optics are bad, but if someone did a little digging and found that Biden was running some drug ring or something explicit illegal, Trump would have came out as a hero even if he did step on that line of abuse of power himself.
Instead...he ran a shadow team through his personal lawyer (talk to rudy) that operated outside of the normal channels to strong-arm Zelensky through extortion of the aid (that Trump had no right to withhold in the first place) to just...force him to announce an investigation into Biden for the sake of publicly smearing him and raising questions. All because he couldn't get the same effect of launching an investigation state-side since they would have found nothing. Hell, Trump could have solely focused on the whole "Biden extorted Ukraine to save his son" conspiracy and it would have been at least half as effective without even involving Ukraine in anything. Trump is a moron.
For the last fucking time Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath about having sex, it was about the lying and not the sex you shilling kikes.
Aid for the Ukraine was never held up, Trump asked the Ukraine to investigate Biden for his corrupt dealings.
So many fucking shills in here.
>an American politician and his son extorting monies from other countries in exchange for influenc and US aid
Hilarious.
Democrats won't impeach because in the Senate they will be the ones on trial , that's why they abandoned the constitutional procedures for an impeachment inquiry and held a kangaroo court in Schiff's basement
They want to impeach Trump for investigating corruption , but they don't want the public to discover that he was right to do so.
The chances of enough Republican Senators voting to impeach to give them the 60 votes they need - NIL
No, spygate is still raging on. It is being covered up by RUSSIAN COLLUSION and the IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS
He didn't lie. He did not have sexual relations with Monica "That Woman" Lewinsky.
She had sexual relations with him.
The question is - are the shills being paid in rubles or yuan?
And how much?
Dubs speak the truth.
But it's weird how no one even talks about it anymore
I support Ukraine's Right to Investigate anybody for wrong doing in their country
Oh yes, this woman would put on shoe polish and paint her mouth area red while dressed like an organ grinder's monkey with a chunk of watermelon in her hand and do a song and dance all while saying she isn't acting like a racist caricature if it meant getting more money from rich white dudes.
>impeached for lying under oath about having sex, it was about the lying and not the sex
Nobody thought it was about the lie, they all thought it was about the sex.
The lie was how they did it but they wanted to smear him with a sex scandal, they just didn't realise that the public don't care that much about sex scandals in presidents. Even Trump has been largely immune to them and his sex scandals are way worse than Clinton's.
Lying about bribes would make it a bribery scandal, lying about sex makes it a sex scandal. Yeah, that's not the law but the public aren't lawyers and impeachment is a political process, not a legal one (well, not exactly). The public's opinion matters because congress members have to stand for re-election regularly and if they defy their electorate's opinion on the big stuff, they'll have swings against them, so it's only done when they really have to.
They cant even investigate their own wrongdoings user
Ching Chong Epoch Times bullshit
>breaking the law
>getting a blowie
>versus abusing the power of the presidency and hundreds of millions of dollars in aid for personal political gain
nah op YOU'RE FUCKED in the head
Aid was never withheld, Zelensky himself said he was never pressured, much less strong armed, no investigation had been held at the time the aid was released ,it's pretty awful how you shills just make shit up, or think your imaginings are facts
But then, I suppose that's what your Guru and Messiah Adam Schiff does, so we can't really blame you.
Ukraine has been getting fucked a lot, in case you didn't notice. Everybody wants to blame Trump for Russia Collusion but it looks like the Obama administration has been colluding with Russia a lot more than Trump. Ukraine lost Crimea with no support or help and not even much of a backlash. Obama just let that shit go and did nothing to stop it. Who is colluding now?
>Ed Snowden comes around, drops the plot
>WHAT IS NSA - some Trump faggot
fuck you shitbirds, Ed Snowden told us all what was going on with the government and that fucking pussy Trump called for him to be killed
THEN Trump whines about shit he would have known about if he paid attention to Ed Snowden
#1 Don't contact Russian Spies, you may come under NSA surveillance
#2 Don't contact Russian Spies because come on you dumb faggots I already told you once
Verdict: Trump is a worthless faggot like his homo supporters and deserves to be burned alive on public television
What have you added by saying that? That they are having corruption issues?
>aid was never withheld
shut the fuck up YOU FUCKING LYING HUMAN FILTH
Ignorance is bliss
Stupidity and authoritarianism tend to run together, so yeah.
He used the words “that woman” because he could not remember her name.
>nbcnews
>NBC News
>NBC
>"news"
Ha, good one , user
Aid was withheld. It was investigated by pretty much every ambassador and they couldn't get a single answer from the White House as to why it was being withheld. Even that perfect phonecall where Trump said, "I want nothing, I want nothing" was when Sondland called Trump asking about what Ukraine could do to get the aid released.
independent.co.uk
Zelensky would never say publicly that he was being pressured. He doesn't have too either, since the other Ukrainians who worked with the American ambassadors were asking questions about why it was being withheld.
The quid pro quo that at least Sondland admits too was for just the "public announcement of the investigation, not so much the investigation itself." Which is funny because Ukraine already had plans to conduct an interview with CNN where they would hold up their end of the bargain and announce the investigations, but before they could do that the whistleblower report went loud, and Trump was forced to release the aid two days later.
axios.com
You're boring as fuck. Every single talking point you have is one link away from being proven incorrect. All you have is projection because you have no defense.
Stupider is not word, I'm weary of people who use it. Also, you could make that argument for anything on that chart. You could be a stupid libertarian too. Stupid people just run with the crowd without thinking for themselves.
Edgy. Do you get this fired up in your civics class
I got a (you)
Thanks user
Do u not like truth user?
ok boomer nigger
There is no truth. Only political lies. Big Brother keeps us entertained while the real show happens behind the curtain.
>war is peace
>ignorance is wisdom
>slavery is freedom
What truth is that? What law did Trump break ? If Schiff and his cronies, with lawyers sitting next to them, couldn't answer, I would love to hear what the bush lawyers here think.
Trump delayed aid to the Ukraine for various concerns - according to him:corruption, the DNC server and other nations not contritbuting ,
- but the aid was eventually released, without any investigation into the Bidens being held ( there are now 3 spearate Senate committees investigating the Bidens , so the truth will eventually come out)
Everything at the House inquiry was hearsay and imputation by witnesses who never witnessed anything.Don't you think that if the Democrats had a case they would be drafting Articles of Impeachment already.
Instead, they have punted it to the Judiciary Committee where they hope it will just die and be forgotten - like the Muellr Inquiry and Russian Collusion
>the DNC server
No, Trump will not have to leave office because his party has a majority in the senate. I generally lean towards the Democrats but think this is a stupid waste of time.