/lbg/ - letterboxd general

RYM edition.

Previous threads: >Not sure what letterboxd is all about?
The mission of /lbg/ is to promote the intelligent discussion of film as art by providing members with opportunities for intellectual discussion, by recognizing patrician taste through examinations and by calling out embryos as they appear.

>Haven't got an account? Follow this link and sign up today!
letterboxd.com

>QotT
Why haven't you migrated to the superior site yet?

>News
deadline.com

Use as a link to find the /lbg/ thread.

Remember the following:
>Patricians occasionally read these generals and have posted here before.
>Patricians may pretend to be normal users asking for recommendations and when you recommend something, they laugh at you for your plebian taste
>This is a thread for patrician purposes only don't offer or expect frivolous discussion.

Other urls found in this thread:

letterboxd.com/Arokz/
youtube.com/watch?v=Qi-kEPrc6o0
letterboxd.com/machill54/
letterboxd.com/eowyn_lovegood/
youtube.com/watch?v=sRg8kgthx2U
youtube.com/watch?v=VD0fUz4rmQg
youtube.com/watch?v=NWWeQlXfSa0
letterboxd.com/DPIW73/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What's your favourite martial art film lbg?

Kung-fu Hustle :D

what is your favorite dead general thread? and why is it /lbg/?

Throw Down (2004)

Headshot (2017)

>they laugh at you for your plebian taste
>plebian

oh I kek'd

anyway, what is your favourite M. Night Shyamalan film /lbg/ and why is it The Village?

>la la land rated higher than split
>has only watched 32 films from before 1960
>below entry level favorites
>less than a thousand films watched
>retarded bio
>poo in loo

wew lad, dont ever post again

>4 day weekend
>no plans

could it finally be
the long awaited
the Andy milliganathon??
wahoo

>resorting to save his shit general thread bumping with blank posts( twice!)
Pathetic, but you know it already

Das Boot was so fuckin good, what a wild ride it was

letterboxd.com/Arokz/

RIP to Michael Ballhaus, cinematographer for some of Scorsese and Fassbinders most beloved work, but more importantly also to Wild Wild west

F

wtf i hate von trier now!!

youtube.com/watch?v=Qi-kEPrc6o0

alright?

>no favorites
ashamed of your taste huh?

some retards think having favorite films is "beneath" them

looks cooler not having favs
but if I were to pick right now i'd have something like
>the wolf knife
>河流
>郊遊
>Inauguration of the Pleasure Dome

letterboxd.com/machill54/

hello

>using kanji titles
wew lad

good taste tho

>la la land rated higher than split
implying Split doesn't deserve bellow 80 rating
McAvoy was great as always, script was good, but it's not his best. Period.

>below entry level favorites
implying I should have became a pretentious piece of shit after joining Sup Forums and listed Synecdoche, New York, Barry Lyndon, Taxi Driver, The Thing as my favourites like everyone else, instead of listing the films I already loved before joining Sup Forums

>less than a thousand films watched
implying I only watch films, don't spend my time exploring music, reading or studding paintings

>has only watched 32 films from before 1960
>retarded bio
>poo in loo
wew skinhead NEET stalker who forgot his own pic and who only knows about films, stop stalking people like that

also I know I've not seen much, there are many films to watch yet, but at least I'm not and won't ever be an arrogant piece of shit enough to think I'm the definition of cinephile, now that's retarded and kind of plebeian

also sorry for not being pic related interesting and important rater or reviewer

>this whole post full of fag rage
Thanks for the book, embryo

how upset can you get

What did he mean by this?

>letterboxd.com/eowyn_lovegood/
>location: death star

L M A O
M
A
O

When jokes writes themselves

I won, thanks.

...

huh so it must not have been him then!

no, he literally just deleted his account after embarrassing himself in such a catastrophic fashion.

All that work for nothing!

...

lmao you guys bullied another embryo into submission

best post ITT

>it's a "slept samefags to save face after that awful embarrassment of an essay last thread" episode

Who the fuck names themself slept

The weak should fear the strong

...

Mmmm

>2 (two) Godard movies
we are reaching whole new levels of insecurity
Resnais+Truffaut carried the new wave, everyone else is only pretty good (Malle, Marker) or worthless (Godard)

Tell me why you liked zero de conduite
I just watched it and it was pretty good, especially that last slo-mo uprising scene , and I liked how he expresses the playful rebellion of the kids in other aspects of the film, like the midget headmaster, etc.
But overall, it was just pretty good, especially compared to L'atalante

>another Godard hater
Embryos are pathetic

>post profile and get no (You)s

I am going to kill my self

wahoo!

Ronald making self-harm threats again

thank you for this reply. It means so much to me. I will not kill my self

please stop calling me Ronald!! I am going to kill my self again now

>"I’ve never gotten anything out of his movies. They have felt constructed, faux intellectual, and completely dead. Cinematographically uninteresting and infinitely boring. Godard is a fucking bore. He’s made his films for the critics. One of the movies, Masculin, Féminin, was shot here in Sweden. It was mind-numbingly boring."
-Ingmar Bergman

>"His gifts as a director are enormous. I just can’t take him very seriously as a thinker — and that’s where we seem to differ, because he does. His message is what he cares about these days, and, like most movie messages, it could be written on the head of a pin."
-Orson Welles

>"Someone like Jean-Luc Godard is for me intellectual counterfeit money when compared to a good kung-fu film."
-Werner Herzog

Godard has no emotional drive when he makes his movies, he has a bloated self-worth and sees himself as too intellectual to make a movie that can actually be enjoyed.

People who say they enjoy his """""films""""" are too insecure to admit to liking something meant to be liked. His films have no power to them, just empty, boring ideas laid out in twisted ranks. To say that this actually interests you is to signal to everyone your childish need for attention as someone "different" and "smart" and "avant-garde". Godard should be gassed along with his protege bitchboy Carax.

>inb4 I'm getting too worked up
Fuck you I just have a lot of feelings inside me

I have never seen nor heard of any of these, otherwise I would have said something.

>Make a thread about Bergman or Wong Kar Wai
>Doesn't get no more than 20 replies
>Blacked threads gets almost 300 replies

What did Sup Forums mean by this?

Why do you quote
>His gifts as a director are enormous.
if you wanna hate on Godard? That's a really retarded choice of quote bro.

I think it is still possible to admire a film (or at least the film maker making them) without enjoying them
This trail of thought implies enjoyment is the sole purpose of films, and I don't think this is necessarily true

I near universally hate everything I've seen by Godard but I'll still be sad when the dude dies
He's spent 50 years doing things that are genuinely creative and new and able to surprise people, and that's cool as hell

Godard was the Tarantino of the French new wave.

I really enjoyed Breathless and Pierrot le Fou but after watching Contempt I think Bergman was right about some of his films being boring

Because I didn't actually read the quote when I pasted it

It said "filmmaker insults" so I assumed it was more insulting then it turned out to be...

>I think it is still possible to admire a film (or at least the film maker making them) without enjoying them
I don't think Godard falls into this category. Haneke makes movies that nobody enjoys in terms of "happiness", but they're still very powerful and provocative, and thus enjoyable in that sense.
Godard's movies have no similar power to them, they're just strings of experimentation for the sake of experimentation.

I don't know what you mean by "happiness" but i am very entertained when i see a haneke film

Of course you're one of those who feast upon these so repeated-in-void quotes. Anyone with a proper brain or cinematic knowledge could only laugh at all those tired axioms, false on all accounts, and so stupid in themselves that there's no need to even apply them any specific case.
But then again, such is the way of the embryo

Another statement meaning nothing

>Because I didn't actually read the quote when I pasted it
>It said "filmmaker insults" so I assumed it was more insulting then it turned out to be...
>then
You are a vermin

I love movies about childhood and adult idiocy, The 400 Blows is actually my favourite movie.

I like Godard aestheticism in the 60' and Je Vous Salue Sarajevo is one of the most powerful short movie I have ever seen.

Spl2 a time for consequences

>marker
>new wave

oh i am laffin

>Godard's movies have no similar power to them

clearly they do as we are still talking about them 50 years later and they are still provoking heated discussion/debate. People clearly react to them, even if it's negatively such as yourself, to me this is still admirable

youtube.com/watch?v=sRg8kgthx2U

I mean that the emotions you experience are very different from that of a musical or romance, for example. It's no secret that haneke wants people to feel unsettled and jarred after viewing his films - that's why they rarely if ever have satisfying conclusions.

Essentially what I'm saying is Godard's films provide no emotionally driven provocation. They just present experimental shit and expect you to provide your own desire to explore it.

No one genuinely wants to see a film that has the attitude "EY LOOK HOW CRAZY I AM, ANALYZE ME YO LMAO"

you have said literally nothing

tee hee
I still hate him though

mmm maybe I'll check it out if it's only a couple minutes

La jetée is usually considered one of the last movies of the new wave?

>People clearly react to them
Boredom + annoyance that people still wank off to him in lieu of other, much better filmmakers
The fact that Godard gets more attention then Resnais is a crime

Why is it so unfathomable to you that your opinion isn't actually the only possible and correct one

If you don't like Godard that's fine, I don't like him either as I said in my first post, but saying every single person that likes his work is pretending and it's absolutely impossible for anyone to do so is dumb as shit, the mentality of a 4 year old or something, there's enough fans and critical body of work to think maybe there is something to him

youtube.com/watch?v=VD0fUz4rmQg

>not assuming your own opinions are empirically right
pleb detected

>Essentially what I'm saying is Godard's films provide no emotionally driven provocation. They just present experimental shit and expect you to provide your own desire to explore it.
Which is blatantly false and can only be said in shitposting or by someone who didn't actually watch his cinema
>No one genuinely wants to see a film that has the attitude "EY LOOK HOW CRAZY I AM, ANALYZE ME YO LMAO"
That's your projection on a director and his films that are intimidating to you
>you have said literally nothing
Unsurprising you couldn't understand
>tee hee
>I still hate him though
Hehe, awesome
>mmm maybe I'll check it out if it's only a couple minutes
Don't bother, it will be lost on you
>Boredom + annoyance that people still wank off to him in lieu of other, much better filmmakers
More stupid projecting. Godard attracts and create reactions for plenty of reasons besides the two negatives that your incapacities can come up with
>The fact that Godard gets more attention then Resnais is a crime
Not in any way, Godard is the bigger name and Resnais is widely acclaimed, just not on the same level.

By language and 'ideas', you are nothing but the classically arrogant embryo that infests the land

>he can't provide counter arguments if I don't provide any arguments...

pic related could be (you)!

>that green and black mess of quotations
gross.

>La jetée is usually considered one of the last movies of the new wave?

it isn't though, what is your source?

More like
>not a 12-year old detected

Exactly, you never provided any worthy argument besides your own embryoness and ignorance in those posts. Must be enough for you

It's very clear, not a mess if you don't have eye matters.

You are operating on a very low level of irony

You must be new here.

>rating Miami Vice 5/5
Justembryothings

Just tried to watch one way boogie woogie but the quality was abysmal, does a rip better than the one on kg/ptp exist or is this the only copy out there?

>ITT: smelly redditors
Fuck out of my board

That's all you've got? Weak.

youtube.com/watch?v=NWWeQlXfSa0

this should be the first post of every thread

...

Assuming that Hitler started gassing Jews since day 1, that makes for 3,153,600 minutes.

6,000,000 Jews killed during 3,153,600 minutes comes out to 1.9 Jews per minute. That means Hitler killed roughly 1 Jew every 30 seconds. (LOL)

In Auschwitz, the most famous and biggest concentration camp, there are 15 crematoriums. According to Auschwitz survivors, Jews would go into the chamber, gassed for 15-20 minutes, then put into the oven.

It takes 1 hour to cremate a body using modern furnaces which operate at much higher temperatures than the traditional ovens at the camp. However, lets say that the ovens were operating at a level that we see today, that means it would take 1 hour, 20 minutes to gas and burn 15 Jews assuming they were all burned simultaneously. (Disregarding the time it would take for the gas to empty the chamber for the bodies to be transported from the chamber to the oven.) The elevators used to transport bodies were very slow and could only take up 7 bodies at a time with their weight capacity. However, for our greatest ally, we're going to assume that bodies were teleported instantly from chamber to oven.

That means 15 Jews were gassed and burned every 1.2 hours. That comes out to exactly 300 Jews every 24 hours (Assuming the gassing and burning of Jews was happening every hour straight for 6 years on an uninterrupted basis) the total number of jews killed would be 657,000 for those 6 years. The official Jewish story is that 4,000,000 Jews were killed at Auschwitz alone.

How can any Jew, Israeli, or Shill ever even argue this story when just simple math is enough to destroy the whole argument? Can any Jews respond to this?

Why are (((trans advocates))) giving kids hormone blockers?
If they don't go through puberty their dicks won't grow, and there won't be enough penis to invert to a "vag".
They're just creating stunted men with nun-functioning penises

...

>being so autistically literal-minded that you think that every single individual jew killed in the holocaust was gassed and cremated

>1945+72
>still propagating the idea of a holocaust of the Jewish people
The question is, why?

Imagine like, 10 or 15 years from now when these kids are old enough to actually understand the decision they shouldn't have been encouraged to make.

>not an argument

...

fuck off Will Folsom

Disgusting

Suicide rate is extremely high, there's that at least

>2017
>still believing the holocaust

letterboxd.com/DPIW73/

Hi

>anything made by woody allen more than 2 stars

wew

whats wrong with Woody Allen?

pedo

Not everyone can a be a contrarian pleb like you.
Allen is a great director, a giant american name

Good one, reddit

anyone who lets anything but the quality of the film interfere with their enjoyment of said film is fucking stupid. It's like when people said they disliked Hacksaw Ridge entirely on the fact that he said some shit some time.
Woody Allen has some excellent films under his belt and "duuhhh pedo" isn't a justifiable criticism" how about you actually watch something of his and form your own opinion

I don't support pedophilia, sorry guys

I've been in a horror mood of late, I might watch something different tomorrow or keep with a horror theme, I don't know

the void sucked, you're a bad user

>cant separate the art from the artist