Why do Democrats always cry after elections and pretend they only lost because the other side cheated...

Why do Democrats always cry after elections and pretend they only lost because the other side cheated? I get that the DNC attracts women and petulant man children but there must be some talent in there somewhere.

Attached: trumpwillwin.jpg (1800x1000, 112K)

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-73
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Apparently you have no recollection of the Republican tears after Obama won. It was pretty sad.

Attached: 1500064986095.jpg (864x1152, 161K)

Attached: 1478987074504.jpg (731x960, 58K)

Attached: 1569559877718.jpg (865x458, 118K)

It's not pretending. There's overwhelming evidence that the Russian government utilized cyber propaganda efforts to influence the 2016 election. Most reasonable people can tell you're not acting in good faith when you include the words "why" and "always" in the same question.

I hate Trump as much as the next person, but I'm almost glad he did win just to stick it to all those smug as fuck Democrats who thought there was no way Hillary could lose. They even had shirts and shit with slogans like "spoiler alert, Hillary wins"

remember when righties were so butthurt they claimed a US citizen wasn't born here just because he won an election.

Attached: 1574045006008.jpg (720x972, 67K)

The Mueller report did not clear Trump of anything

Attached: cW1I4SW.jpg (626x960, 57K)

Attached: 1499366943838.jpg (616x960, 108K)

Attached: 36jpqw.jpg (750x500, 87K)

Attached: trumpisachildrapist.jpg (1209x945, 154K)

Attached: 1564805109392.jpg (307x3500, 463K)

>OP in his thread

Attached: 1321080510980.jpg (3000x2880, 1.35M)

Attached: 1564025392885.png (500x668, 189K)

Attached: 1573073581666.png (680x485, 525K)

Attached: 6k1dg4lcf2141.png (768x768, 450K)

It also didnt prove anything. You can't be exonerated when what you're being questioned for isn't a crime in the first place.

None at all. Did it go on at full volume for his entire term across every form of media? Did Hollywood celebs hijack the Oscars to badmouth him? Did they make out it was the end of the world and everything would fall apart?

>Why do Democrats always cry after elections and pretend they only lost because the other side cheated?

They can't face reality. I expected them to wake up after Trump fed them his big orange dick in 2016, but they dont seem to have learned anything. They're still pushing feminism and communism that only the far left fringe wants. They're still shitting on white people who make up the majority of the country. They're still pushing their shitty corporate candidates that no one wants.

Fuck em. KAG. Trump 2020

Attached: Hillary Clinton.jpg (640x640, 369K)

The Mueller report pointedly did not exonerate Trump of obstruction of justice, which is certainly a crime.

>I get that the DNC attracts women and petulant man children
Holy crap, a new troll line. You made my day!

>Did they make out it was the end of the world

Yeah, a lot of them did. I realize a lot of Sup Forumstards were children at the time Obama was first elected and don't really remember much from that time, but some of us were actually old enough to vote back then and we clearly remember the conservative hysteria following his victory.

funny how the democrats didn't use that one....

i voted for him the 1st time....certainly not the 2nd time

Why do you think so?

>Guilty until proven innocent

you guys are unhinged

Attached: Trump7.jpg (400x267, 14K)

I never said he was guilty. I said that the report did not exonerate him of obstruction, and that obstruction of justice is a crime.

>Russian propaganda
The problem with the left is that they assume everyone is extremely stupid and their beliefs are easily swayed. Liberals read Facebook posts and repost infographics all day assuming that what they read and post is accurate and it affects the thoughts and feelings of others. People on the right take Facebook and the bullshit posted on it with a grain of salt.

The Russian propaganda changing peoples' votes is the biggest example of projection from the Democrats.

Don't forget the Democratic Party attracting the most loathsome creature to walk the Earth...


The Male Feminist.

So he default obstructed justice until something proves that he didn't?

In other words, he's guilty of obstructing justice until there's proof that he didn't obstruct justice. It kind of sounds like guilty until proven innocent.

Attached: 297E5EA3-2695-436B-9490-4A6CCC7FB59E.gif (500x338, 1.2M)

Attached: BF8F50FA-0B23-4B13-9C37-10E5D582852C.gif (500x338, 1.2M)

I can't speak for all liberals, but for my part, I don't think everyone is extremely stupid as you describe it. More like one-quarter to one-third of all people. I think that's a reasonable estimate. It's not a majority, but if we're talking about a large-scale effort by a major power's intelligence service, it's surely enough to sway an election in favor of a particular candidate.

The report didn't exonerate you of shoving your whole head up your ass

Attached: trump.jpg (640x636, 59K)

No. You're putting words in my mouth. It was not within the mandate of the Mueller investigation to establish the President's guilt. That is the domain of Congress and Mueller said as much in interviews and the text of the report. The Mueller investigation was supposed to establish the facts of the case and present them to Congress to take the appropriate action. Mueller himself said that if they were able to clearly say that the President did not obstruct justice, then he would have said so. That's what I mean when I say that the report did not exonerate him.

This was before Laci Green was getting regular infusions of cock. Now that she has a steady BF, all of a sudden she's decided there are only 2 genders again.

>The Mueller report pointedly did not exonerate Trump of obstruction of justice, which is certainly a crime.
Mueller didn't find anything, so your logic is that there could possibly be something not found, so trump is guilty of the un-found evidence that hasn't been found yet.

>Why do Democrats always cry after elections and pretend they only lost because the other side cheated?
This is a straw man. The fraction of Democrats who think this is probably on par with the fraction of Republicans who honestly think 3 million votes in California were cast by noncitizen immigrants.
Both fractions are tiny (I hope).

>I get that the DNC attracts women and petulant man children but there must be some talent in there somewhere.
Why are you talking about the Democratic National Committee?
Or were you referring to Democrats in general and you thought DNC was a smart-sounding way of referring to them?
Yeah...no.

From the Mueller report, Vol. II, p. 2:

"if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state".

If Mueller didn't find anything, why didn't the report say that the President clearly didn't commit obstruction?

So the point of the Mueller report was to find proof that Trump colluded with Russia to effect the outcome of the election. No collusion was found and instead of saying "we didn't find anything so there was no collusion" he said " we didn't find any collusion but that doesn't mean he's not guilty of collusion". So in other words, he's guilty until we find something that proves he's not guilty.

aka guilty until proven innocent

>Acting like every time a Dem wins Republicucks don't make up shit

In any other nation the USA forced into democracy, the person with the most votes wins. Pathetic the US can't follow the rules and has a group of people paid to choose a winner by the richest corps.

Please pay attention. I'm not talking about collusion, I'm talking about obstruction of justice, which is the domain of Volume II of the Mueller report. It's freely available if you want to read it.

You're saying, "he's guilty until we find something that proves he's not guilty", but a more accurate summary would be, "we found evidence that the President committed obstruction, but since this is simply an investigation and not a criminal trial, we have no authority to conclusively establish the President's guilt, therefore we won't do so".

Each state should be worth 3 points regardless of the population. You can be all "derp but more people live in California than Wyoming" but that doesn't mean that people in one area should have the right to choose how people in another area should spend their money and live their lives. I understand the argument for the popular vote but it doesn't work when the entire voting population is 1000's of miles apart.

>"we didn't find any collusion but that doesn't mean he's not guilty of collusion". So in other words, he's guilty until we find something that proves he's not guilty.

I couldn't begin to imagine what it must be like to go through life being so cognitively challenged.

If you truly think "we can't rule out that he might be guilty" logically implies "he's guilty", then I don't see any point in trying to reason with you.

Attached: trumperA.jpg (852x480, 82K)

There's no proof of collusion, which is the crime they were investigating. But now he's guilty of obstructing in the investigation of a crime that they proved didn't happen?
So if a cop asks me why I was speeding and I say I wasn't speeding he can't arrest me for speeding but he can arrest me for obstructing in his investigation into whether I was speeding or not?

How do you idiots not realize how hard you are reaching to commit Trump of a crime?

I can't rule out that you don't beat your wife.
Draw the conclusions from there.

Wow, I just can't get over how confused you are. It's astounding.

I don't know if a traffic stop constitutes a criminal investigation or if saying "I wasn't speeding" constitutes obstruction, but yeah, any interference in a criminal investigation is considered obstruction of justice. It doesn't matter if you're actually guilty of the crime that is being investigated or if you're even the subject of the investigation. You can read more about it here:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-73

The problem with the obstruction of justice case is that Trump is still proven innocent of the original crime but now they're obviously reaching for reasons to oust him, and that only strengthens the opposition. If a cop says he smells weed in my car and I refuse to let him search my car, and then they search my car and don't find any weed, the cop can charge me with obstruction but in the public eye it all strengthens my argument.

Not an argument you fucking retard. I can't prove that you have kiddy porn saved on your computer but that doesn't mean you've never saved kiddy porn on your computer. GUILTY.

So Hilary did nothing wrong?
So Obama is innocent?
Get your story strait putin.
It works or it doesn't.

when are you going to stop beating your wife?

>There's no proof of collusion, which is the crime they were investigating
There is no crime of collusion.
>But now he's guilty of obstructing in the investigation of a crime that they proved didn't happen?
They didn't prove that it didn't happen. Christ, why is this so difficult for you?

But even it were somehow proven that Trump didn't commit any underlying crime being investigated, obstruction is still a crime. That's how our system of justice has always worked.

Oh, come on. 80% of the mass media was reporting that Hillary had a 105% chance of victory, and Trumps butt looks like a marshmallow when he wears his white golf pants.

you cant prove a negative retard

Attached: 1349286271592.jpg (612x612, 36K)

Well he wasn't and anyone with a brain knows that.

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE THE PURE SCALE OF THE TRUMP BUTT HURT

No, they can't charge you with obstruction because you're constitutionally protected from unreasonable search and seizure and have the right to refuse a search of your vehicle.

A more accurate comparison would be if you, as the mayor of your quiet midwestern town, discovered that the local sheriff's office was investigating you for smuggling marijuana. You know that you're innocent of this crime, but nonetheless you ask one of your subordinates to deliver a note to the sheriff saying that you're being treated unfairly, that you haven't done anything wrong, and that the investigation should be closed.

This is more accurate because it's very similar to an episode detailed in the Mueller report, Volume II, pp. 91-92.

>The Mueller report did not have any evidence of Trumps wrongdoing
fixed that for you

Bro stop making up random percentages. It makes you look stupid.

>The problem with the obstruction of justice case is that Trump is still proven innocent of the original crime
No, he wasn't.

> If a cop says he smells weed in my car and I refuse to let him search my car, and then they search my car and don't find any weed, the cop can charge me with obstruction

No, he can't. Refusing to consent to a search is your constitutional right. It's not obstruction.

>Not an argument you fucking retard. I can't prove that you have kiddy porn saved on your computer but that doesn't mean you've never saved kiddy porn on your computer. GUILTY
Jesus, you're off on a tangent having an imaginary argument. You seem to think that at some point I said that the fact that Mueller could not establish Trump's innocence on certain allegations implies his guilt.

Except I never said that. Because none of this is confusing for me.

>They didn't prove that it didn't happen
So what did happen? And what was the point of the investigation and what was the conclusion of the investigation?

If you have no answers to those questions then you're saying the investigation was pointless or you're saying he's guilty until an investigation proves he's not guilty. Which the Mueller investigation already did.

yea 7 people swayed an election roll eyes while

China interfering on behalf of Hillary via the media and funding her troll farms
Ukraine interfering on behalf of Hillary, proven prosecutions occurred in Ukraine
Saudi Arabia interfering on behalf of Hillary, paid 20% of her 1.2 billion run
Russia interfered on interfering of Hillary, even the maker of the dossier was unregistered Russian agent and Hillary took 145 million from them

somehow didn't....

I hate to tell you other country's have had had their hand in our elections and we have had out hand in theirs for a long long time...

And you think that's a good thing? Shouldn't we resist attempts by foreign governments to influence our electoral process?

>you cant prove a negative retard

Let's see what this was in response to...
Oh yeah, It was a response to me saying "They didn't prove that it didn't happen."
In other words, I said they didn't prove a negative. Because of course they can't.

So who's the retard?

Attached: sloth_MAGA.jpg (900x720, 46K)

thats exactly what a pedophile would say, disprove me with sources

4 more years because cry baby turds make-a-me-raugh

its nothing new and who do you think Russian wanted? the women colluding with them up till 2016 or trump?


when they have the 300,000 missing emails as a mater of fact
they stated they have them there where monitoring guccifer when he hacked her sever
Also the Chinese has them

of course they want miss going to be blackmailed Clinton

you're right those numbers are way too low, only fox news had it right.

Why do Republicans always cry after elections and pretend they only lost because the other side cheated?

I get that the RNC attracts under educated white people and billionaires, but there must be some talent in there somewhere.

Thry literally made a movement called the teap party just because of him. Literally just a bunch of racist retards masked behind the mask of "deficit spending" which they didnt give one shit about after trump got elected. Face it, republicans are a bunch of weak pathetic boomers that cant get with the times.

Nah nigga fringe faggots were calling for pictures of michelles genitals but it wasn't as bad as these trail o' tear cry baby ass bitches

f u u can

You do know that the government has proof that Russia interfered before the 2016 election and has been interfering for a long time now, right?

Idk if that one is Trump's fault though. I do believe he attempted to have Ukraine interfere with 2020 though because he fucking said it himself, multiple times.

that's exactly what a rapist would say, disprove me with sources

>still pushing fringe candidates
>still pushing corporate candidates
>still pushing social issues
Then what the fuck do you want them to do. Face it, you're the fringe in america. Everything left of you is socialism and you would rather be have a neo nazi in the White House than a democratic socialist.

who crying tho libtard? watch when trump wins again and there's another endless campaign of pant shitting. it. will. be. glorious.

>white people, billionares, wheres the talent?
lol you're funny

The hysteria wasn't even a fraction is the fucking lunacy going on during this presidency. It's to the point now where I'd rather there be a war between the sides than want to even remotely be a part of society the way the left wants everyone to be. I'll be damned if I allow myself to be a sheep to that. I'd rather live 1 day as a wolf than a 1,000 as a sheep

they'll never win in 2016 I swear it!

So we bomb Iraq for no fuckin reason but won't stand up to a zombie soviet union that directly interferes with our sovereignty? okay whatever you gotta tell yourself my friend.

Dems won the last two elections.
Why do trumptard snowflakes whine about having tantrums when he's impeached before Christmas?

I am looking forward to it!

clearly the words of a albino white double racist rapist, you have 10 seconds to refute this chalky

Attached: FB_IMG_1555606380198.jpg (750x600, 86K)

The tea party existed before him you head ass hahaha.

looking forward to christmas? his 2nd term, which is it user?

Member the last time yall bitches said that? I do I partied my capitalist cock off because our boy dominated.

Trumptard will be defeated utterly.
If he doesn't resign first.
He's putting up no defense to the impeachment hearings, even when offered.

Trumptard tears Boo hoo hoo.

Dominated what?
Received millions LESS votes in 2016.
Crushed in 2018 midterms.
Lost nine governorships since 2017
Lost major seats in 2019.

Try again, wuss.

I am not an albino and have never shown an ounce of racism while hypothetically never raping anyone, although it could be seen as racist because I have never hypothetically raped anyone that wasn't white, if I had raped, which I haven't

sure thing bruh

Attached: 1575450881240.jpg (519x531, 161K)

Heard this before just get ready to cry yourself to sleep... Again you crybaby breastfed till you were 10 lookin ass bitch.

he'll never win in 2016 i swear it!
>lol

Looking forward to impeachment and his utter and total defeat, IF he runs again.

Sure thing, trumptard loser

Attached: FB_IMG_1574830336414.jpg (696x696, 83K)

keep looking maybe in 2024 trump will be outed from office and you will be proven morally correct

Won what mattered though amirite.jpeg

Again you can cut that cake however you want to but be ready to eat humble pie... afuckingainmydude