At what age did you realize "climate change" is bullshit?
At what age did you realize "climate change" is bullshit?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
investors.com
zerohedge.com
telegraph.co.uk
breitbart.com
climatism.blog
investors.com
wattsupwiththat.com
blog.frontiersin.org
spectator.com.au
ca.finance.yahoo.com
aei.org
wrongkindofgreen.org
twitter.com
As soon as I was born, so the doctor slapped me and then cut off my foreskin.
>At what age did you realize "climate change" is bullshit?
At age 227.
When I did the math on CO2 and temp and noted the .68 correlation whereas solar output was at .95
That was when.
I was a skeptic because Greenpeace is so anti nuclear power. Math cemented that.
It's not. This isn't up for debate.
Do retards actually think the climate DOESN’T change? Whether it’s man made or not, the climate changes. Did a 16 year old make a bunch of you guys go full retard?
>Shilling hard at 9:30 for Texas minimum wage
Fuck off faggots. I hope someone burns the shareblue building down with you in it.
This is all you need
Then there is this guy
You are just as potato as the Autist in OP's pic
>.68 correlation whereas solar output was at .95
kek'd
you're telling me that if you burn 999 trillion barrels of oil the atmospheric pressure will not change? nice troll faggot
Ah so you think the climate doesn’t change. Must be fun sucking your dads dick.
There is indeed climate change, I would say the puny human race affect very little of it though.
It is mostly due to the sun itself going batshitcrazy.
i want to impregnate gretas fetal alcohol syndrom pussy
It took me until my early 20s when I realized that it's all complete and total bullshit. Whatever happened to the global cooling that they said was going to happen in the 70s and 80s?
>some people really believe this
The climate is always in a state of flux, but I have never been a subscriber to Climate Inc.
And some people believe they can control they have more power over the climate than the motherfucking center of the solar system that has energy to blow us up million of times over as if we were mere fleas.
""""""""""Climate change""""""""""" is actually a thing. The Earth is constantly changing, but the left is perpetuating man-man climate change; which is absolute Socialist/Marxist propaganda. Even if we were causing the temperature to rise, I am not stopping eating meat, driving my big truck, paying more taxes and bringing in Socialism to ~maybe~ curve the change of .003 in 100 years.
A cool way to prove that would be to compare the temperature in the other planets in the solar system that we can and see if they are also rising
in temperature.
>snow in october???? so much for GLOBAL WARMING HYUK HYUK HYUK
die boomer
You first ...
-9 months
When i started to notice that after 20 years of claims the earth would be dead in 5 years nothing has happened.
They took down her stupid braids for the cover to increase her feminine appeal.
hey retard we are obviously talking about man made climate change. now kys
Friendly reminder that basically all arguments against climate change caused by humans are a giant smokescreen.
The only relevant question is whether or not our exhaustion of CO2 (and methane, to a lesser extend) is sufficiently big to cause a greenhouse effect.
When you compare the number of studies and evidence correlation against climate change you find it's literally MORE LIKELY THAT THE EARTH IS FLAT than that climate change isn't largely man made.
In 2019 if you're not being paid by someone and you actually believe climate change is a conspiracy you're less intelligent than someone who believes the Earth is flat and you belong in special ed. Unfortunately Sup Forums is full of people like this so we have this false impression that there's more than a minority who don't believe the science
Also for what it's worth, the acceptance of climate change goes up the more educated people are- especially so in climatology. Of course if you're retarded you say this is because that's where the conspiracy or money is or whatever but for reality I think it's safe to say anyone who disagrees with climate change is an uneducated spastic
This isn't about intelligence, its all about the performative value of denying basic facts. Its gaslighting, and for people of a certain constitution this is a group building effort, while others just revel in the "power" it gives them, if only by proxy.
when i realized that everyone bitching about it wants taxes or some austerity bullshit in the west but ALWAYS refuse to address the elephant in the room: china
as long as those chinks are polluting as much as they fucking please with no consequence i'm not doing shit greta
>implying you ever "did the math"
>implying "your" ever did the math
>not mentioning the difference between the correlation of an effect and its size
China is basically the only valid point in this discussion. I'd just tax any shit that can't proof its up to standard to hell and back. You'll seen how clean China will suddenly become, even though it'd only effect their exports.
>This isn't about intelligence
It absolutely is, but it's a small part of it.
People who genuinely don't believe in man made climate change are a minority but they DO exist and it's largely down to the same factors-
>Lack of education
>Lack of critical thinking
>Lack of understanding of basic science
>Lack of trust in science or scientific authority or experience
>Being tied to an agenda or career in some way tied to climate change
>Being a nutjob
Almost all of these are negated to some degree by intelligence
I also don't know anyone who doesn't believe climate change who I'd call intelligent to any degree other than perhaps the odd child or two who saw conspiracy videos on youtube before learning critical thinking
we're all fucked
These memes are getting more and more stale every day. Use them while you still can.
Fucking retards.
Okay, those are fair points.
muh sun
26 when it was 20 years from when i was told by a very intense climatologist who told a class room of kindergartners that if we didnt start making huge changes we would be dead before our 30th birthdays.. ill be 30 next year
The first doubts were when i learned that the planet was 20° warmer on average before the onset of the ice age. We are coming out of a cycle. Might we be accelerating it? Sure but the 150 year window we base normal on means nothing to the earth
serious question: to people who believe that manmade climate change is a conspiracy- what do the conspirators have to gain? I'm not saying youre necessarily wrong, but i actually cant come up with an answer to this one short of someone having a personal vendetta against oil companies or something.
>Someone who taught kindergarden was an alarmist as a kid therefore I don't believe basic science
You going to school was a waste of everyones time
literally this. Climate change is just a meme to make you a fucking slave to the system, just like feminism.
People are so fucking stupid they will believe anything just to get good boy points on Instagram or Twitter.
I am not sure people think there isnt climate change, just that the percentage mankind affects it is overly exagerated. People are simply assuming it is without looking for any other explanations.
The idea is that they are getting paid decent technocrat salaries from "the government". You know, like every fucking scientist who does research on every fucking topic ever. Its the kind of braindead meme only 80 IQ people can ever really believe, as its falling apart the moment it is challanged.
It's real but it's cosmic radiation that heats the core from the inside.
thats funny considering without water vapor in the atmosphere the greenhouse effect would leave the ambient temperature on earth at about -12 degrees celcius, you dumb shitstain
There never was a climatologist or even metereologist in their kindergarten. Why would there be? Unless THE JEWS send them, of course, because that's what """""""they""""""" do, right? Remember all the climatologists and metereologists in your kindergarden?
That's the kind of bullshit story that's obviously made up.
I don't think they think that far ahead. When you confront them with evidence the argument usually boils down to some combination of
>99% of science is made up
>The media portrays the science in one way when it's another
>Literally infographics
>It's alarmist nonsense
>Some scientist in 1980 argued against climate change therefor he was right
or something like this guy where
>It's just a trend
They don't actually look into it or study any climatology- they tend form their retardedness based on opinions and media and trends and stuff
well but that implies the government has something to gain from bribing those scientists to publish results in favor of man made climate change, which seems like the opposite of what is actually true.
No, its the jews. Its always the jews. THE JEWS. Literally a thought stopping meme, and universally applicable to anything you don't like.
too
Indeed. Most gov, especially with conservative parties in charge, are desperate to pretend the problem doesn't exist or isn't as pressing.
Hey man. It's real this time, wink wink.
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
In February 2017, UKIP British politician Nigel Farage defined the Swedish city of Malmö as the "rape capital of Europe",[133] and linked the high number of rapes in Sweden to the immigrants and asylum seekers from Africa and the Middle East;[133] he was subsequently criticized by the BBC because, at the time, there were no data available on the ethnicity of the attackers.[133] One year later, in August 2018 the SVT and BBC itself reported that rape statistics in Sweden show that 58% of men convicted of rape and attempted rape over the past five years were refugees and immigrants from outside of the European Union[86][87] (Southern Africans, Northern Africans, Arabs, Middle Easterns, and Afghans);[86][87] Swedish Television's investigating journalists found that in cases where the victims didn't know the attackers, the proportion of immigrant sex offenders was more than 80%.[87
Or they are skeptical of the degree to which MAN's influence, specifically is effecting change, also skeptical on what this may or may not mean for the future as projections are sketchy at best, also skeptical on what is the best path to control any kind of climate change that might prove detrimental.
But yeah, if you dare have thoughts like this, you're an informed rube. We need to panic and cap and trade needs to happen yesterday.
Not really, I don't think there is any conspiracy, just people jumping the gun and being legit wrong.
One thing is to show a graphic saying there is climate change, another is to blame it ALL on humans.
The second part is what I have a problem with, and I have not seen actual evidence on that, they are just shoehorning all blame to a single cause, I would call that a theory at best.
lazy pasta, consider suicide
Those with money and power in favor of destroying any notion of sovereignty have a ton to gain from anti climate change action.
climate change isn't bullshit. the climate is changing. worrying about it is bullshit. raising taxes because of it is bullshit. trying to create a static climate is bullshit.
yes man has effected the climate minutely, but no it will not matter because the climate will change on its own far more dramatically than what we would be able to do
they tie climate in with the influx of criminal shitskins
>WE HAVE TO ACCEPT UNLIMITED AMOUNTS OF IMMIGRANTS
these white traitors are the death of europe
Honestly it was pretty recent, with this latest iteration.
1966: Oil Gone in 10 Years
1967: Famine by 1975
1968: Overpopulation Spread Worldwide
1969: Everyone Disappears in Cloud of Blue Steam 1989
1970: World Use Up All Natural Resources
1970: Citizens Require Gas Masks by 1985
1970: Nitrogen Makes All Land Unusable
1970: Decaying Pollution Kill All Fish
1970s: Killer Bees
1970: Ice Age by 2000
1970: American Water Rationing by 1974, Food Rationing by 1980
1971: Ice Age by 2020 or 2030
1972: Ice Age by 2070
!972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
1974: Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
1974: Another Ice Age
1974: Ozone Depletion Peril to Life
1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines Imminent
1977: DOE: Oil Peaks in 90s
1978: No End to 30 Year Cooling Trend
1980: Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes
1980: Peak Oil in 2000
1988: Regional Droughts in 1990s
1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
1988: Maldive Islands Underwater by 2018
1989: Rising Sea Levels Obliteration Nations by 2000
1989: NYC West Side Highway Underwater by 2019
1996: Peak Oil in 2020
2000: Children Won't Know what Snow is
2002: Famine 10 Year if We Don't Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
2002: Peak Oil 2010
2004: Britain is Siberia by 2024
2005: Manhattan Underwater by 2015
2006: Super Hurricanes!
2008: Arctic Ice Free 2018
2008: Al Gore: Ice Free Arctic 2013
2009: Prince Charles: 96 Months to Save World
2009: UK PM: 50 Days to Save Planet from Catastrophe
2009: Al Gore: 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic now 2014
2013: Artice Ice-Free now 2015
2014: 500 Days Before Climate Crisis
Friendly reminder that basically all arguments against climate change caused by humans are a giant smokescreen.
The only relevant question is whether or not our exhaustion of CO2 (and methane, to a lesser extend) is sufficiently big to cause a greenhouse effect.
Right now, at current age, all thanks to this post right here on Sup Forums. Thanks OP.
Then you're ignoring climatology and evidence and pandering to or against opinions
The science is extremely clear on how man has affected climate change vs how much of it is uncontrollable and down to natural factors, it's literally why we have and use science instead of opinion
Then ill friendly remind you that is a big "if" there son, and only IF we can reach a point to where it is actually detrimental.With no greenhouse effect at all we would be freezing, so, your point?
At what age did you realize your head was up your own ass?
No we are still in the realm of opinions, we have no sources being put out there. Just words in a shitboard.
Oh, I thought you were actually debating climate change. Either way stop forming your opinions based on Sup Forums threads
My opinions were formed way before Sup Forums, if I happen to stumble on several peer reviewed papers proving that all of this is all man made, instead of simply people panicking in social media, maybe ill change it?
>nothing bad can ever happen to us
>nothing bad has ever happened to us
>cherrypicking your copypasted memes.
Cool story, bro. Peak Oil is already here.
>proving that all of this is all man made
You know you'll never find that, as you alluded to in your first two posts.
Like I said already, the science of man made vs natural climate change is extremely well established and has been for years and you should probably stop forming opinions on social media and Sup Forums rather than the higher than 97% of climate and environmental study and data that shows the effects and trends of those links
It's like saying you believe the earth is flat and not spherical because some studies show people have been moving land mass around, and because facebook and Sup Forums keep saying it's spherical
It's literal nonsense
the Moon's temp has been on a rise since the landings
People need to understand that climate change is advocated for preemptively on purpose. We don't have a full grasp of what will happen when, we just observe patterns and presume what will happen next. So of course people will predict things early, or embellish it's impact on your own life, because it's legitimately still an urgent and pertinent issue. And humans don't like changing for weak reasons. You have to tell them their house will flood, or they won't stop using the backyard beach as a disposal.
>implying you ever read a peer-reviewed paper on climate change
No, and I am not really interested in doing so, I will read the ones that are related to my field of work though. Why I said if I stumble into some, or if people cared enough to bring those out to light.
>They don't actually look into it or study any climatology- they tend form their retardedness based on opinions and media and trends and stuff
most trends and opinions are proclimate change, so you are probably a ecoshill that want us to pay more taxes
You dumb bastards should give up. Nobody is changing their opinions.
Can't sell this shit in the US. Less than 20% of the support than in the past.
Paying more taxes would correlate to more expenditure and ultimately to increasing the effects of climate change
Nice try though dumb dumb
The funniest part about this thread is climate change peons getting furious when the reality the same scientists they adore today were saying the same holocaust-esque predictions before they were even born. The point of the kindergarten story is to highlight that even scientists arent devoid of scumbags who will exploit public hysteria for funding and support. Climate change is real for sure but the climate on earth has also already changed extremely drastically several times the concept that we are heating up the earth while we also have scientists agreeing we are actively still warming since the ice age period conflicts the singular narrative thats all. I believe in climate change i dont believe the hysterics around it. Gobi desert used to be a rain forrest our small window of normal is nothing to the changes that occur over the period of decades centuries and eons for the earth
en.wikipedia.org
Faggot. Also, if you don't trust NASA or the IPCC, why would you trust any peer reviewed articles?
False flag activist detected.
The climate changes, it always has with or without man. We can’t do anything about it.
Heyy...nice Elon...
Friendly reminder that anthropogenic climate change is an empirically proven fact backed up by decades of research and hundreds of thousands of studies. In fact, oil and gas companies and their own research divisions are among the main academic/scientific proponents behind climate change research.
Zero Hedge or ZeroHedge[b] is described as a "markets-focused" blog,[3] that presents both in-house analysis, and analysis from investment banks, hedge funds, and other investment writers and analysts. Zero Hedge, per its motto,[a] is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.[4] While often labeled as a financial permabear,[5][6] Zero Hedge is also seen as a source of "cutting-edge news, rumors and gossip about the financial industry".[7]
Over time Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial analysis,[c] advocating what CNN Business called an anti-establishment and conspiratorial worldview, and which has been associated with alt-right views,[9][10] and a pro-Russian bias.[11][12][13]
Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; however, the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.[8]
And you faggots call others "shills", its incredible.
22, but to be fair that was in 2005.
Okay now do the same for every scientist on earth.
I think they're working on that. Brother Vladimir takes good care of his shills.
>posting media articles written by journalists who are trying to sell copies
>not posting peer review research
>breitbart.com
Bwahaha as if you did the math. Others read the bullshit sites where you got those numbers too, you pretentious dumbass.
Climate change is bullshit? Aw crap. I guess at the age I’m at now!