So I'm building a gaming PC and I'm unsure on what motherboard to buy, can any PC fags give me some advice?

so I'm building a gaming PC and I'm unsure on what motherboard to buy, can any PC fags give me some advice?
I'm not sure if I should buy the B360 aorus gaming wifi or z390 aorus master
rest of the setup is:
-Intel Core i9-9900K 3.6GHz 16MB Socket 1151v2 Box CPU
-GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660Ti WindForce OC 6GB GDDR6 192-bit
-Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB 2x16GB DDR4 3000MHz CL15 Dual Channel Black RAM
-Thermaltake Litepower 650W GEN2 Power Source

Attached: placa-de-baza-gigabyte-z390-aorus-master-c47.jpg (700x556, 74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

imgur.com/kZIDydq
pcpartpicker.com/list/mPRrMc
pcpartpicker.com/list/x2hh7T
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

AMD is superior, get ryzen instead

Intel fan here.
Get AMD Ryzen Threadripper.
Get the Nvidia GTX tho.

This. Bang for the buck, Ryzen stomps all over Intel, especially the i9 which is way, way overpriced for what it is.

> 6gb gpu

Attached: 1520475634265.gif (400x400, 1.25M)

Your CPU is extreme overkill for your GPU, either upgrade to like a 2070, or downgrade the CPU to avoid bottlenecking

won't a weaker CPU struggle at running games when other programs run in the background? like the antivirus utorrent etc?

Save some money and go with a 3rd gen Ryzen 7 CPU. There's also not going to be much difference using 16 gb of ram as opposed to the 32 gb you have specced. Instead of the 1660 Ti, go with a 1660 Super for the GDDR6 memory which provides better real world performance and for less money.

My old gaming rig is an i7-4770 (4 cores, 8 threads, 3.4-3.9 ghz) with a GTX 970 4 gb and 8 gb ram running Window 7. That POS can still pull 50-60 fps in a lot of games on medium settings.

buy sandpaper and then rub your dick on it

>gtx 970
>2019
>brags about medium settings
Fuck off
don't listen to anybody telling you to get less of anything. If you want your pc to last, get the best you can get.

Not everyone is poor like you.

done it, what next?

As someone who has always used Intel, I can't recommend the i9 due to its cost.

Yup. 2700x owner here. Can confirm that it is awesome for under $200.

Not everyone is a retard like you. Ryzen is better and less expensive.

He's not wrong way more cpu then you need for that gpu. You should be able to balance it out with a Ryzen and better gpu.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six Core Processor 3.4GHz
16 Gig RAM Corsair Vengeance
Nvidia Geforce RTX 2060
How am I doing here? Idk shit about PCs really and I had someone just build me one.

In theory yes, but you would have to run like 8 demanding applications. Get a 6 core ryzen, and get a better gpu. its the most inportant component when gaming

get a 3900x ryzen, they're super fast and sexy, just make sure you pair with the correct ram, they can be picky

>If you want your pc to last, get the best you can get.

Yeah and that PC I mentioned was pretty damn decent in 2014. Now here we are five years later. Guess what OP's computer is going to be like five years from now?

this is a nicely balanced rig for AAA 1080p gaming, with very high frames on competitive titles

>9900k
>1660 ti
>3000 mhz ram

Jesus christ user you have no idea what you're doing.
First of all the 9900k isn't made for gaming, if you insist on getting intel get a 9700k or 8700k.same performance but cheaper. Anyone who says the 9900k is the best for gaming is lying.
Second, the 1660 ti fucking sucks.
Get a 2070 or equivalent at least.
Third, memory frequency is important.
3000 is retarded because most mobos don't even handle this frequency. Get 3200 instead.

Unless your planning on streaming your gaming or doing video editing high end content creation etc you really do not need an i9, your throwing away money really because that is going to play games no better than the top end i7 in all truth.

Like others have mentioned, no sense in the i9-9900 when you can get a Ryzen with more cores for and equally good performance for less. When you do other things like streaming, vidya editing and whatnot, those cores will really come in.

although he shoudnt try to get more cores, just get an 8-core ryzen

idk i didnt think you would do it

Doesn't matter, the setup is fucked anyway.

Why the fuck would you get a $200 GPU and $500 CPU for a gaming rig? If anything, those numbers should be flipped(unless you're also going to use it as a workstation for seriously CPU-heavy applications).

You have relieved me, thank you Sensei.

Check this and don't forget to thank me

imgur.com/kZIDydq

>won't a weaker CPU struggle at running games when other programs run in the background?
Not when you're bottlenecked by the GPU.

Jesus christ, my old 4790k wouldn't be bottle necked with that card and minor multi tasking.

oh wow, look at mr moneybags over here. you know, some of us are still trying to game on i5-4460 over here

Look into older x79 platforms you can do better for the money.

Yeah, Im kinda just saving up and waiting for what 4th gen ryzen will bring

sorry you're poor, work harder, liberal

I don't understand the RIP on 970 in 2019

AMD has much more power for your money. Intel are very salty about it. Buy a decent AM4 motherboard like a Gigabyte and live with either a Ryzen 5 3xxx series or a Ryzen 7 2xxx series for now and upgrade it later on. Spend the extra shekels saved on Graphics and Ram. Can recommend HyperX ram having been using the same 8gb DDR3 since 2015 without a single fault from it. Even the current Ryzen 3 with Vega Gfx is sub £80 in bogland - you can't go wrong.
And yes RYZEN does work with Windows7 x64 with some extra work during install. Gigabyte still supply drivers for Win7.

Sorry for all the retards here OP
Hopefully you haven't bought anything yet as the CPU GPU combo isn't a good one.
>9900k
Only time I'd get this is if you were pairing it with a 2080ti
Buy something in the range between ryzen 7 and 9 like a 3700x or a 3900/3950x. For gaming buy the one with the highest base clock among them.
>570x mobo, b450 if you're saving money. I recommend Asus strix boards even though the vrms usually aren't as good, best bios and add-ons though.
>rx 5700xt or gtx 2070 GPU. Shill whoever

to be fair intel has the mobile market pretty cornered - i like having a balance of options

I'm not really good at this... is the B360 aorus gaming wifi good for AAA games? Can I run games like Witcher 3, Resident Evil 2 remake and Assassins Creed Odyssey on ultra setting with no problems? Is so then what CPU should I use for it if the i9 is too much an overkill?

Attached: pc master race.png (1280x720, 116K)

9600k/9400f if you insist on Intel(though I'd go for B450 motherboard with 3600 instead). Keeping everything else the same(you might want to get faster RAM if you go for Ryzen), that should leave you with enough money to get a 2070 super or 5700XT.

Here's my recommendation if you are looking for good price/performance for 3A and more.
>ryzen 5 3600/7 3700
>Asus strix b450 / 570x
>Rtx 2070 / Rx 5700(xt)
I'll send a list, give me a minute

bump for waiting

PCPartPicker Part List: pcpartpicker.com/list/mPRrMc

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 3.8 GHz 6-Core Processor
CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 50.5 CFM CPU Cooler
Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING ATX AM4
Memory: Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3200
Storage: Samsung 970 Evo 1 TB M.2-2280 NVME
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8 GB
Case: Fractal Design Meshify C ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: Corsair RM (2019) 750 W 80+ Gold

pcpartpicker.com/list/x2hh7T

Ok, so I get it, the CPU i9 is overkill now, but 5 years from now if I'm interested in playing newer games a weaker CPU won't really run them properly.

this but i wouldnt recommend using just one 1TB SSD, SSDs arent built to last.

intel still outperforms AMD for gaming specifically

It's a financial mistake planing for the future tech wise. Been there done that. I mean back in the day 2500k was future proof but the way they make tinny improvements with every generation of cpu's now a days don't bother. Buying premium cpu's never pays off.