I'll enhance and/or upscale any of your photos

I'll enhance and/or upscale any of your photos

Attached: emhance-gigapixel.png (1200x1106, 1.76M)

Come on don't be shy, anything

Nobody?

Work from my last thread

Attached: snucksnuck.jpg (4320x4480, 1.74M)

up

Can you do anything with this?

Attached: 2351A2D9-3434-495D-A56D-250163E604BF.jpg (640x676, 133K)

Please

Attached: 135135.jpg (1080x1350, 139K)

I tried this one last time, couldn't do a proper job because the face is really dark. I'll try again

Attached: 8DA72854-E346-49BF-8B37-E2AB4C5D9E77.jpg (1478x1992, 227K)

Attached: ass.jpg (1280x1352, 1.22M)

already enhanced, do you have the original file?

Attached: CC023D00-5F8C-4B4B-AAB2-560950DA999E.png (640x1136, 1.04M)

Please try it!

Attached: sea.jpg (2160x2700, 1.37M)

No upscaling but sharper

Attached: sharp.png (640x876, 1.07M)

Thanks!

New fast growing Sup Forums server, quickly join before the jannies cuck us.

gg/bVvJDeG

--------
51681

Attached: 1567151968007.jpg (1200x927, 374K)

good stuff user

Can you brighten and expose that pussy please :)

Attached: F692C633-67E0-4BA2-995F-5A195D5BD3C8.jpg (1280x960, 221K)

How about this?

Attached: 90DF790B-07A9-4BB3-B86B-2F2D6F70B08A.jpg (2000x2668, 1.19M)

Attached: D9678D1D-B2D5-4880-99CE-0A47CDD38150.jpg (1200x1600, 342K)

Whatever can be done

Attached: 20191206_033211.jpg (1536x1292, 1.03M)

Attached: pusspuss.png (1280x960, 1.93M)

Attached: 174_1000.jpg (722x960, 63K)

Attached: slut.jpg (1200x1600, 1.18M)

Stolen please clean up

Attached: 6B4D079C-3DE3-4735-BB97-8F4583308359.jpg (1672x2048, 457K)

bad results with this one

Attached: milky.jpg (1536x1292, 1.75M)

Attached: 100px-Buffed_red_soldier.jpg (100x100, 5K)

too low, minimum 256x256

Freaking good job man thnx a lot

Okay, I'll bite.

Attached: 1576957812348.jpg (633x567, 93K)

do your best soldier

Attached: 1526506065879.jpg (858x956, 530K)

not good

Attached: witch.jpg (1444x1920, 1.67M)

the best I can today with my current knowledge

Attached: chubby.jpg (1672x2048, 1.49M)

Try this?

Attached: AAF61431-8AA0-4B91-8453-9D3ED6DF4D9D.jpg (184x276, 16K)

Attached: 100_0290.jpg (3296x2472, 1.02M)

Attached: harold.jpg (1266x1134, 1.58M)

Holy Molly, bro. Thank you for your service!

Attached: cover2.jpg (800x450, 133K)

I just want to see whatever hellish image this will create

Attached: 1576956025961.jpg (795x1024, 331K)

Attached: 1576641457589m.jpg (922x1024, 298K)

Attached: bjsluts.jpg (1716x1912, 900K)

Attached: 1573226331725.png (412x594, 461K)

Attached: MILK2.jpg (3296x2472, 1.6M)

great choice

Attached: multi.jpg (4770x6144, 1.78M)

Huh, I thought it would end up really bad and merge all the pics together or something, interesting

If you can please

Attached: 70514820_129483738434137_9199532369473872420_n.jpg (1440x1440, 316K)

Upscale the whole photo or deblur the woman?

The woman please

Attached: 100_0515.jpg (3296x2472, 1.08M)

Attached: vl8zrg0bgh531.png (640x787, 627K)

Attached: weeb.jpg (1844x2048, 1.65M)

Attached: snakelucas.jpg (1648x2376, 1.52M)

sorry I cannot make a real difference, maybe because of the background + low res

Can this pic be enhanced at all?

Attached: cute.png (640x787, 682K)

minimum res 256x256
i will try tho

Attached: cutebigger.jpg (1280x1574, 1.37M)

Can you also do xrays / see through?

Attached: 20191209_075546.jpg (178x365, 39K)

nah too low + photo of a screen + lights

Attached: 20191207_005904 (wecompress.com).jpg (2555x2448, 347K)

What can your sorcery do on this, muh'lord?

Attached: 1576893026516.jpg (618x728, 46K)

no x-ray

Attached: ho.jpg (712x1460, 736K)

Alright thanks anyway though

Attached: shell.jpg (1236x1456, 1.66M)

Attached: asshole.jpg (2555x2448, 1.39M)

Attached: serveimage.png (240x160, 14K)

Try this

Attached: 1572650585007s.jpg (250x245, 8K)

too low minimum 256x256 (and 8bits)

Nice trips, and amazing job.

What would happen if you ran it through the software twice? You did this the other day.
Just morbidly curious to see what point it stops improving and starts nigging out

Attached: ZoomerchanHD.jpg (3120x2080, 1.14M)

this pls

Attached: y0pal3svw4r21.jpg (750x997, 41K)

This one so you can see her feet better?

Attached: 1595157685309.jpg (480x640, 28K)

>"I'll enhance and/or upscale any of your photos"
>"too low, minimum 256x256

Pathetic

Please

Attached: 6E8360D.jpg (480x640, 93K)

Attached: 31556974_1524916874279006_2619824583343079424_n.jpg (470x640, 101K)

Where is milk1 at?

Attached: X2.jpg (6240x4160, 1.71M)

This one is easy because it had no noise and a lot of textures

>can see her feet better
fucking nigger, NO I CAN'T

Attached: bodyf.jpg (1500x1994, 1.25M)

why her of all women
lol

OP here, I'm out my ears hurts

that's better indeed. nice extra detail on the bush. thanks m8

Yeah, but this was the one that you started with the other day

Attached: Zoomerchan.jpg (780x520, 69K)

Attached: emily__2_.jpg (2824x4176, 1.64M)

Attached: FC002.jpg (400x523, 26K)

Attached: 20191204_182723.jpg (349x527, 109K)

Please?

Attached: IMG_51921.png (480x270, 594K)

anything you can do here?

Attached: 1560209563545.jpg (965x1024, 63K)

Is that from the AOC tweet?

yep

whoever faps to it for real is my hero

What software are you using ?

I use GIMP - and it's pretty good, if you know what you're doing.

Can you do anything with this photo
> pic related
that I took circa February 1994, with an early Fujitsu fixed lens digital camera ?

Attached: DSC_0010.jpg (480x270, 127K)

Op here, I used Gigapixel, deeplearning (AI) based upscaler

Can do anything with this

Attached: LRM_EXPORT_54489366970641_20190930_211808081.jpg (828x1472, 167K)

Can remove blur?

Attached: 52123994_792167687834451_2408578292460313907_n.jpg (1068x1335, 68K)

Attached: 74D81ED7-DDCF-497F-9F6F-330CEC20E8F9.jpg (722x1280, 106K)

: nice dubs ;
> "... I used Gigapixel, deeplearning (AI) based upscaler " ;
sounds good : is it free ? or "evaluation copy" ?

I have used free trial evaluation copies of
> Anthropics Portrait Pro & Lanscape Pro packages .
sure, they were faster than GIMP but seemed very "one dimensional", one-size fits all, solutions that weren't actually using any genuine Artificial Intelligence - just average out approximations obtained from a wide variety of mediocre archetypal point-and-shoot snapshot images.

If I spent two or three times longer with GIMP, I could get much better results, without any watermark etc., limitations (unless you paid an arm and a leg for the paid version).

It's not free but you could try the 30 days trial version like I did

can this be fixed up?

Attached: 394630497072523.jpg (1600x900, 88K)