Imagine being so brainwashed that you think you live on a spinning ball flying around a fireball in the emptiness of...

Imagine being so brainwashed that you think you live on a spinning ball flying around a fireball in the emptiness of space with 0 evidence

A vacuum cannot coexist next to a pressurized atmosphere without a container, testable science.

We see too far. The earth MUST be curving 8 inches per mile squared. its not. we see mountains top to bottom 123 miles away with thermal video. light refraction exists but not to that INSANE extent bending thousands of feet. just another excuse to convince your programming is true

You sheep believe in outer space and a spinning rock earth due to trust of your governmentauthority and video screens. LOL. beyond embarrassing. It only exists within your imagination. Religion lol

The moon and sun in our sky from our perspective are the exact same size and move through the direct same pathway. so the sun is 4000x4000 larger and farther away to the moon from our perspective. the chances of that in random infinite space all from a magical big boom that created everything out of nothing is 0%

also the moonlights temperature is colder than the temperature under a shadow, proving that the moon is its own light source and not sunlight reflecting off the moon. easily testable.

You've been indoctrinated just like everyone else. wake the fuck up. A spinning ball sounds crazier than a flat motionless plane (which is our god given senses)

Herd mentality isn't always correct. saying bait proves your a retard and just suppress information you dont want to hear because it doesnt fit your world view, which is a lie. sorry

gravity is strong enough to hold oceans to a spinning ball (trillions of pounds), yet weak enough that a feather can dance in the wind and trees grow upwards. gravity is simply mass being denser than the air around it. this is why a helium balloon will go upwards due to helium being less dense than air. mass denser than air goes down.

Flat earth is the scientific method. Globe earth is pseudoscience and theories.

Attached: retard ball.jpg (400x400, 26K)

cool

cool story bro

Gravity. How does it work?

Couldn't it be argued that flat earther's have a herd mentality as well?

FUCKING MAGNETS!

Air is metal, and the earth is a magnet, and the atmosphere is air... so like the air sticks to the earth.

The only problem is that your conspiracy requires the cooperation of thousands and possibly millions of people across the world who share no similar culture or language and not a single one of them exposes the "truth" sooooo you're debunked

Attached: vlcsnap-2018-08-25-08h41m35s834.jpg (640x360, 55K)

>and not a single one of them exposes the "truth"
What about all those flat earth threads?

>the chances of that in random infinite space all from a magical big boom that created everything out of nothing is 0%
>infinite
>chance is 0%

You're a very stupid person

if space is infinite then there is 100% chance it will happen.......an infinite number of times

They only answer I've ever wanted to this question but have never gotten is: Why would someone lie about this? What's the point? What does anyone have to gain from having people believe the earth is round and not flat?

You're

OP you fucking massive cockmongler, take the 6 million dicks out of your ears and ass and listen:

we DO NOT believe in your retarded ramblings, no matter how many times you post them. You are a fucking irrecoverable loon who needs to either be forcefully institutionalized or sent to the fucking glue factory, you are a fucking hopeless cause.

FUCK OFF with your dumb fucking threads.

>IN FUCKIUNG BEFORE "HURRRRRRRRRRRRR YOU ILERMINATY LIZERS PEPLE SHILL"

Having worked with vacuum chambers all summer.... I'll give you a bump.
The crazy sound of air rushing in and out of a stainless steel vacuumed chamber makes me question the strength of the atmosphere.

This is a troll baiting trolls.

Flat Earth? International space station. There, disproven.

The atmosphere is a density gradient not a brick wall or conatiner. Technically the ISS and space shuttle are orbiting in the atmosphere although the density is vanishingly low at 250 miles up. That's why they both need corrective burns occasionally for orbital maintenance. Even the moon has a thin atmosphere. Do you even physics my illiterate friend?

There's a good reason why those threads don't make it into peer reviewed magazines and research.

If there was the slightest chance that any of what you say was true then scientists would be experimenting with it and writing about it to make names for themselves. They don't because it's bullshit and only kids on the internet waste their time with it.

And on that note, cya later.

don't you see? ISS is fake. the reflectors put on the moon by the astronauts? fake. OP's dick? fake.

there is literally no way to reasonably argue with these people.

Cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.
The earth is flat, look into it.
Also space is fake.
There are no satellites in space.

Flat Earth Truthers (among other theorists) always come across as Coked-up salesmen.

> what are the chances of you having a girlfriend? 0%
> But if you get really old and never die? Still 0%
Your text proves nothing. your logic is faulty

Holy fuck user. Do you seriously think that the atmosphere stays at 15 psi all the way up until the edge of space? No, retard. The atmosphere gets thinner and thinner until it dissapears. It's like the ocean, there's no pressure at the very surface, and it gets heavier the further down you go because there's more ocean above it squishing it down. It's because of this magical thing we call gravity, which, might I remind you, STILL EXISTS EVEN IF THE EARTH IS FLAT.

>STILL EXISTS EVEN IF THE EARTH IS FLAT

you were doing so well user, but then you had to goof it up at the end

>if space is infinite
It isn't.
>then there is a 100% chance it will happen
Not necessarily. An infinite set means all *possibilities* will occur. It doesn't mean all (or even any) *impossibilities* will occur. Take the number line for example. There are an infinite number of integers. Start counting and you can go on forever. But even though the set of numbers is infinite, you will never count to the color blue because blue is not a number on the number line.
>inb4 some smartass posts the hex code

relax. from my experience, you can't convince a flattard unless you point out things which are observed to behave the same on both the flat and globe earth.

>spotted the sore assed liberal who tried to post on Sup Forums

>what is gravity

>when you realise earth is like the ball inside a shop-vac and our universe is more than dust particles inside God's vacuum cleaner

Yes, they are unable to understand Mass, Magnetic Fields, Gravity etc.. on such a large scale. I love the repeated "lab testable" comments.. as if. I generally enjoy hearing\reading various theories, but this one has gotten very tiresome.

Imagine lacking an education and making others suffer for it-_-

Cool story vro

The thing is that you can actually have a pressurized fluid next to a vacuum and produce it in a lab. All you need to do is provide enough acceleration to squish the fluid down enough to create a region of vacuum, like a centrigfuge spinning at a ridiculously high speed. But flattards don't seem to understand basic physics so I'll cut them some slack for not figuring that one out.

Honestly kinda sad how hard people are getting baited by this thread.

I don't believe in flat earth I think it's round but I dont believe in science bullshit either, big bang and all that are bullshit and moon and sun night and day all that, there is literally 0% chance that all this is random, so I think God or something behind that

You are metal.

I know it's bait lol, i just love ranting about how stupid flat earthers are

Imagine being so brainwashed that you think you live on a spinning ball flying around a fireball in the emptiness of space with 0 evidence
>A vacuum cannot coexist next to a pressurized atmosphere without a container, testable science.
>We see too far. The earth MUST be curving 8 inches per mile squared. its not. we see mountains top to bottom 123 miles away with thermal video. light refraction exists but not to that INSANE extent bending thousands of feet. just another excuse to convince your programming is true
>You sheep believe in outer space and a spinning rock earth due to trust of your governmentauthority and video screens. LOL. beyond embarrassing. It only exists within your imagination. Religion lol
>The moon and sun in our sky from our perspective are the exact same size and move through the direct same pathway. so the sun is 4000x4000 larger and farther away to the moon from our perspective. the chances of that in random infinite space all from a magical big boom that created everything out of nothing is 0%
>also the moonlights temperature is colder than the temperature under a shadow, proving that the moon is its own light source and not sunlight reflecting off the moon. easily testable.
>You've been indoctrinated just like everyone else. wake the fuck up. A spinning ball sounds crazier than a flat motionless plane (which is our god given senses)
>Herd mentality isn't always correct. saying bait proves your a retard and just suppress information you dont want to hear because it doesnt fit your world view, which is a lie. sorry
>gravity is strong enough to hold oceans to a spinning ball (trillions of pounds), yet weak enough that a feather can dance in the wind and trees grow upwards. gravity is simply mass being denser than the air around it. this is why a helium balloon will go upwards due to helium being less dense than air. mass denser than air goes down.
>Flat earth is the scientific method. Globe earth is pseudoscience and theories.

the moon is round so how can the earth be flat?

i just dont get it. was this bullshit supposed to be entertaining?

Attached: 1576965321749.jpg (523x480, 35K)

>what is a science

bc its a coin.....

OP is a moron!

Attached: ntwice.jpg (372x326, 66K)

>0 evidence
Ur delusional and blinded by the truth

Attached: lossy-page1-258px-Ivar_Nilsson_in_Kung_Lear_at_Dramatiska_teatern_1908_-_SMV_-_GN020.tif.jpg (258x356, 17K)

>container

Attached: atmosphere.jpg (836x731, 130K)

> A vacuum cannot coexist next to a pressurized atmosphere without a container, testable science.

It makes sense that air (with mass) is attracted to the earth, and vacuum (nothing) isn't; But you're so fucking sure, I don't know, right? Prove it then.


> We see too far. The earth MUST be curving 8 inches per mile squared. its not. we see mountains top to bottom 123 miles away with thermal video.

I'm sure the curvature of the earth falling away 8 inches times miles-squared (an estimation) is masked by the density/thickness of the atmosphere visually. The formula "8*(2^m)" is known to underestimate the actual drop for short distances, and overestimate the drop for longer distances.

>The moon and sun in our sky from our perspective are the exact same size and move through the direct same pathway. so the sun is 4000x4000 larger and farther away to the moon from our perspective. the chances of that in random infinite space all from a magical big boom that created everything out of nothing is 0%
It's > 0%, because there it is. The chances of your faggot ass being born is 0%, yet here you are (maybe you're fake)

>Flat earth is the scientific method. Globe earth is pseudoscience and theories.
Nothing you've said corroborates this

1. A vacuum CANnot coexist next to a pressurized atmosphere. You can achieve it by accelerating the fluid quickly enough, like a centrifuge spinning crazy fast. But I don't expect you to be able to understand that.
2. Well, that makes sense. Longer, less energetic wavelengths are refracted more.
3. Pure strawmanning. I believe in outer space and a spinning rock earth based on my own observations and hypotheses, as well as finding many explanations for strange phenomena from the scientific community where the flat earthers can provide none.
4. First of all, the chance is no 0%. The chance of anything happening is always greater than 0%. However, it is a strange enough coincidence that I believe an intelligent creator designed our solar system this way.
5. Easily debunked, the experiments trying to prove the moon emits "cold light" don't take into account variables such as buildings having residual heat from the day. Plus, it's literally impossible for something to emit "cold light", this is a scientific fact.
6. The believability of any system is subjective. For me personally, a flat plane with a dome above it and floating celestial bodies that self-illuminate despite being able to see shadows in craters seems less believable than bodies in orbit around each other, which also explains why gravity exists.
7. I agree herd mentality isn't always correct. But I see more herd mentality around flat earthers than from people who believe in the globe, lmao.
8. Yes, it is. Not only does gravity hold oceans down, but the 68 miles of atmosphere above it, which ALSO hold the ocean down. Feathers dance in the wind because of air resistance. Trees grow upwards because they're designed to grow strong fibrous structures that can easily counteract 9.8 m/s/s acceleration of gravity.
9. You have it completely backwards, lmao.

*A vacuum CAN coexist, my bad.

Ultimately, what does it fucking matter?

RE:9
FUCKING KYS

The moon isnt real, it's a giant projection on the firmament. The jews do this to further us from the lord.

>A vacuum cannot coexist next to a pressurized atmosphere without a container, testable science.

Space is definitively NOT a perfect vacuum...

What is the thermosphere? What is gravity even? Pic related.

Attached: youdensemotherfucker.jpg (903x960, 52K)

kek'd

>also the moonlights temperature is colder than the temperature under a shadow, proving that the moon is its own light source and not sunlight reflecting off the moon.

Let me explain further since I didn't want my original post to become too long: People have been studying celestial bodies and their motion for thousands of years. Ancient Babylonians recorded the variation in length of daylight throughout the solar year, the periodic positions of Venus, recorded star catalogues, etc, and eventually created mathematical formulae to predict the motion of the planets.In the 3rd century BC, Aristarchus of Samos estimated the distances of the moon and sun, and created a model of the solar system, where the earth and planets rotated around the sun. People have believed in the globe earth for thousands of years, based on scientific observation. This idea of the flat earth is relatively recent, and is mostly perpetuated with faulty science and experiments (like "cold light" from the moon, lmao)

This isn't a joke

nice fairy tale user.

well it's pretty funny, so you might as well own the fact that your beliefs are a joke

im gonna award ...

>4/10

good attempt. Keep at it!

The stupidity is strong in you...

You're beliefs are the joke here bud. G-D WIL.L SEE THAT YOU UNDERSTAND HIS WORD!!

The thought of "Space is a vacuum" is incorrect. Much like how people think we dont use 100% of our brain or the theory of evolution means we came from monkies.

Flat Earth, flat planets.
Wait..

You don't even know my beliefs, bud. All I've said is that I think your beliefs are funny, and therefore a joke.

the atmosphere extends a bit over 6000 miles from the surface and is constantly being blown away by solar winds
space itself is mostly gas

Just like the 6000 years the planet has aged!!

I already know them atheist troll

even flattards grasp the concept that air gets thinner the higher you go in altitude. At about 9-10 miles high, humans would suffocate and die. As you keep going higher above that, the air density continues to decrease. So at something like 100 miles up, it makes sense that there would be essentially a vacuum. No barrier needed in either flat or globe models. How high is this dome over a flat earth suppose to be? anything more than a few miles and it would play no part in containing the air.

Lol, you're completely wrong. I'm a theist, and believe in a god. Idk which god or which religion is correct, but I know something had to create the universe.

OP here, Lol look at everyone REEEEEE. If flat earth is so stupid. why even bother desperately trying to refute it. The earth is so provably flat. poor lost souls. They refuse to look into the other side. they love their religion of theories and fantasy. Deluded. But i understand, we were all indoctrinated. from my heart i feel bad.

Attached: asdasdasdasd.jpg (225x225, 15K)

>Lol, you're completely wrong. I'm a theist,

Attached: tipping-intensifies[1].gif (287x344, 141K)

Why did something have to create the universe?

Attached: lllliiiiuuuuyyyy.jpg (540x1158, 70K)

Attached: asdffffffffffff.jpg (1561x1535, 238K)

how does my fucking cell phone and gps work if there are no satellites

Attached: pypypypypy.png (500x375, 80K)

Attached: theism.png (587x467, 87K)

Not a flat earther, but I've heard them say it all works from cell phone towers lmao. How does GPS work in the middle of the ocean then? Are there secret submarine transmitters for global GPS coverage?

Boomer memes are just awful

Attached: weeewwewewe.jpg (1200x1200, 149K)

Attached: [[[pppppp.jpg (480x362, 65K)

Attached: carefu.png (625x626, 55K)

>If flat earth is so stupid. why even bother desperately trying to refute it.
because the stupidity is growing. It's also very possibly that no one on this thread is an actual flat earther. But we can at least refine our arguments against it for the sake of clarity and scientific accuracy.

besides, the modern flat earth movement started here on 4ch by a few trolls and lots of idiots bought into it. ridiculous arguments are par for the course here.

I believe something cannot have come from nothing. The big bang theory only explains what happened after the bang, but not the cause of said bang. A creator must have caused it, and made a universe with parameters capable of forming stable orbits and galaxies, and even intelligent life.

What makes you think we want you to stop? We love it when flattards show off their stupidity. Keep it up!

>a creator
Well then who created the creator? You've just added another fake layer to a question that we don't fully know the answer to.

So where did the creator come from?

It's disappearing because it's 1000 feet of low fencing, taken at a very shallow angle, on a low resolution image. Find an image of a tall fence on a perfectly flat stretch of land extending several miles, I'll wait.

*you're

People always ask "Who created the creator?" The answer is that we'll never know. It's like a muffin asking "Who baked the baker?" The muffin will never know because it lacks the intellect and the ability to find the answer, and it will be eaten or decompose long before it ever finds out.

So the billions of dollars the US government spends to build satellites and the billions that SpaceX is spending to build satellites and the rocket launches... all of that is fake

coins are flat not round

They're both, actually.

This is irrelevant because, as far as we know, there is no solid proof that there is a creator. It's ridiculous to propose that there is one when the evidence is so vague and nonexistent.

impossible

People ask that because saying that the universe requires a creator without explaining why a creator doesn't also require a creator is absurd. There's no logic behind it.

>muffin asking
?
try to read a book or something. you come off as a complete moron.

reptilians

Attached: denyt4sbxyh21.jpg (1242x1491, 178K)

Cool

I actually do have a theory. Let's assume that a creator did exist, and made our universe. If this is true, than any law of existence of the universe, such as time, mass, quantum particles, etc, could be completely arbitrary, even existence itself (where something needs to be created in order to exist) Maybe the theoretical creator occupies a strange, inconceivable reality where he always existed, because time doesn't exist.