ITT: times when critics were objectively wrong

ITT: times when critics were objectively wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/bOXP4dqDV3U
youtu.be/AWlAceoOJYM?t=7m27s
imdb.com/year/1990/
youtube.com/watch?v=ksqvsDj8sjc
youtube.com/watch?v=W7b20GjSAFY
youtube.com/watch?v=izaSOlXYdiA
youtube.com/watch?v=9G_fffsYHMI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

That score should have been lower.

Any Pink Panther movie without Sellers is objectively garbage, bet you can't name any other scene than the hamburger shit.

days of thunder and rush hour deserved kino tier

RT gave TFA like 97%

>forgetting the scene where he looked like he was eating out his secretary
>forgetting his blatant sexual harassment in general
>forgetting Kevin Kline's GOAT performance

I haven't seen this movie in eleven years and I remember all that shit and more.

You watched the trailer.

...

...

How *does* it hold up against the originals? Those were jaunty fun.

>so you are Yuri the trainer who trains.

fucking Into Darkness

It doesn't hold up against Sellers, but that wasn't OP's topic. Even the synopsis writer thought 22 was too low. Middling implies around 50-60%, and somewhere in the 50s is where I'd put it. It had its moments, certainly a shitload more than its sequel.

>My miracle pill for the middle aged man!

Civil War. Not trying to start an autistic cape debate but RT gave it a 90% and I only remember the cringy fight scene

...

I don't get how anyone can not love this movie

...

Waterworld

...

What the fuck

Was there anything more plebeian than a 1990s film critic?

Nope.

Home Alone 3 got a 27. That pile of shit actually got a higher percentage than Lost in New York.

>but an uneven script and a premise stretched unreasonably thin make it hard to wholeheartedly recommend

I want to strangle this piece of shit.

My fav McTiernan. I like it more than Die Hard.

what the FUCK

Literally this guy: youtu.be/bOXP4dqDV3U

That synopsis is bullshit, too. Most critics hated it because of its cliches.
The cliches that they failed to realize McTiernan was lampooning.

Even that faggot nostalgia critic went on a rant about how stupid the cartoon cat was despite it having four seconds of screentime and actually worked as a parody of gimmicky bullshit in long-running action franchises.

I don't know if it's a joke or not.

Honestly, everyone has given Doug shit for how wrong he views Last Action Hero. Especially his current and former fellow Channel Awesome reviewers.

>this movie was released when I was a kid, it MUST be good

Garbage special effects, shitty villain, romance storyline because, etc.

A 50/50 recommendation sounds about right.

there were a few terrible parody comedy films from this time period.
this film got lumped in with them...even though it was a lot better.

at the worst its a 6/10 comedy.

It's from Parks & Recreation.
youtu.be/AWlAceoOJYM?t=7m27s

I'll never get used to all the tasteless faggots that infest this this board.

There's another one at 18:20.

...

This didn't deserve to flop and deserves at least a 70%

you fuckers cannot unironically beat this shameful act done upon this kino.

What the fuck

batman_v_superman_rotten_tomatoes.jpg

>literally every review is just an excuse to make fun of the title of the film . Dude Adventure begins?? More like it ENDS XD because it sucks lololol

fuck off Pun Making Critics. This is better than any mainstream action flick from hollywood in the last 10 years

>he will defend pic related's crime against humanity

Literally Spieljew's best film.
Literally John Williams' best work.

Prove me wrong.

>PROTIP
(You) can't.

is this fred ward kino?

>Loved this movie when I was 10
>Feel adult shame for having enjoyed it now

RUFIO
RUFIO
RUFIII OOOHH

It's pretty cheesy but fun if you like that sort of thing.

the special effects were considered great back then

(though i don't know why they insisted on CGI animals in scenes they could have used actual animals)

No, child. That movie was a fucking travesty compared to the original.

Wait did critics give it a good score or something?

...

That's just fucking horseshit, legitimately

That score pretty good for that movie.
I mean like it a lot as a kid but looking back it's just decent at best. Though it didn't deserve to flop.

what the actual fuck

its my favorite Ward Film by far. Ive probably watched 5 times.

Its light hearted /fun adventure movie. Though with some legitimate thrills and some funny lines (especially from the """asian"""" sensei character)

the Statue of Liberty fight is pretty kino

These are quite possibly the most inaccurate scores for any film ever made

>Jumanji
>not kino
these critics should have their licenses removed

It looks fantastic, it's faithful to source material, the fights are kinda cool, it's enjoyable. That doesn't make it a good movie, and I love it.

I remember watching this as a freshmen in high school and thinking I shouldn't be be seeing this. A super raunchy movie

I've noticed a lot of stuff posted here would get 99% on RT if it was released today.

I wonder if this means that films were just significantly better back then ? Like were the films coming out at the same time as this so good that these picks are crap by comparison

You're right... It should have gotten a lower score.

>mfw

It wasnt that bad

>been wanting to watch this since York talked about it in Deadly Premonition

It's now or fucking never.

The critics were all mad that he used real sets instead of that newfangled CG greenscreen.

Fucking bullshit.

/spoofkino/ hall of fame
post some more

yes, the bar was set way higher in 1990
imdb.com/year/1990/

Space Jam and Back in Action should swap scores.

I remember watching this at my best friends house when we were like 13 and right at the locker room scene, his mother comes to the room. The door and the TV were looking towards us so she couldn't see what we were watching.
Her smile saying "how are you doing boys?" while young women's breast where displaying right beside her still make me kek

Gotcha.

That was one of the better Arnolds

Wat

Also, this is a very underrated movie imo.

Can you customize RT? Would be a cool feature
Like blocking critics that gave GirlBusters higher than a 5/10. So their reviews don't factor into the final tomato score

>inb4 can't handle different opinions
I'd use critics with similar tastes to mine so then i can see if a movie is worth checking out

>that foreign exchange student with those godtier tits
>constantly naked
>subtitles went out of their way to not cover her tits

Overall good movie. Great songs, but I mean really

Everyone knows this was complete shit but liked it just cause the public had soured on Lucas since the prequels.

The score alone makes it at least a 5/10.

youtube.com/watch?v=ksqvsDj8sjc
youtube.com/watch?v=W7b20GjSAFY
youtube.com/watch?v=izaSOlXYdiA
youtube.com/watch?v=9G_fffsYHMI ;-;

It's a personal 9/10 for me. Hoffman's performance was fucking magnificent.

Nah, it was mediocre. The prequels were like a train crash, and the trains were carrying manure on fire.

so like

what the fuck

>smees plan

>Female Toby is Kirsten Dunst

Deepest lore

When did mainstream /big budget/ Hollywood go so wrong ?

I feel like it just turned to crap right after the first matrix came out.
Either way I blame Chinese market

It's weird how critics are wrong 100% of the time.

I believe that Olympus/London has Fallen are both great fun action movies. But I could be bias since I really enjoy Gerard Butler in action movies.

Do these people get payed to watch these movies and write this shit?
Is it on a commission basis on whether their score matches with the popular opinion?

Blue my fucking mind when I saw that bullshit.

This motherfucker alone made the movie great, and it would've been pretty good without him.

Oh would you look at that. It's another John McTiernan film. It's like the critics had something against him.

Every Marvel movie that goes higher than an 80%

>no consensus yet
OFF THE GRID. TRUE KINO FLIES UNDER THE RADAR.

...

>Blue my fucking mind

It was Initial D minus any intensity that Initial D brought to the table.

Every single Marvel movie.

Fans liked it, and most other people thought it was ok.

The movie itself is fine, but critics went extra harsh on it because of the whole "videogame movies are always bad" meme.

My grandma took me to a version performed by all home-schooled children last fall.

>Dyslexia

...

Just about every review talks about how unnecessary this female was but it just scrapes over the line for them.

It's more that the nostalgia driven manchild crowd didn't exist, and most reviewers were probably older people who were asked to review some movie based on a kids show they never heard of and didn't care about. Imagine being some kind of film critic who got into it in the 60's and wanted to review serious movies, then eventually things get to the point where your boss comes in and tells you to sit down and watch Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Movie. It's why every kid's movie that people remember from the 90's like Pokemon: The Movie have something like a ~30% in aggregate scores
The fact that most movies with a >90% RT score now are either oscarbait, capeshit or capeshit adjacent is actually disgusting

> you'll never have a high speed race with Michael Rooker in shitty rental cars.

literally the worst of them all