Photos Printed At New London Pharmacy Lead To Child Porn Arrest - Hartford Courant

A man has been charged with possession of child pornography in connection with photos he allegedly tried to print at a local pharmacy.

An investigation began when a pharmacy called police on Dec. 17 to report that a man was printing inappropriate photos. Police arrested David Gunn, 41, of Connecticut Avenue, that day on unrelated charges and seized some of his devices.

Investigators, working with the state Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force and National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, later found that Gunn was in possession of numerous images of child pornography, police said.

He was charged Friday morning with second-degree possession of child pornography.

Bail was set at $50,000.

courant.com/breaking-news/hc-new-london-child-pornography-0415-20170414-story.html

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=74Kn1pNIlq8
thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=spot_the_pedo
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Typical ¢unn¥ poster

>printing child porn in public

How can people be this stupid?

david the one who draw cunny pics?

...

Is this 1995?

what does it mean by second-degree possession?

>people who post threads like pic related literally look like that

drawings like loli

sexually suggestive stuff

God damn it. It's always the dumb ugly ones that get caught. People like him are giving us a bad name.

he looks like he has a mouthful of cereal

>printing pictures

What is this, 2002?

>hi my name's David Gunn and welcome to jackass

the last time i did that it was for a funeral

Holy shit
People still print photos?

>inevitable nuclear war
>no more electricity
>???

he's actually in the right and probably a prophet

who will play him in the inevitable bio-pic?

>Pedophile
>Has mental problems

Well who woulda thunk!?

>American
There's your answer

How come the pedophiles always look like pedophiles.

Show me the guys photo sans news article and I'd come to the conclusion that "Yep, that bloke diddles kids."

literally because they are mentally ill and do not groom themselves

There was that guy from the show Glee. I think his name is Mark Strong.

That man could spend a king's ransom on a makeover and still look like he fucks kids

youtube.com/watch?v=74Kn1pNIlq8

is he a bogdanoff?

I would never have suspected this arsehole.

>there's no such thing as attractive ped-

>How come the pedophiles always look like pedophiles.
I saw a photo posted here from the 30s or earlier where a handsome looking guy married a little kid. I tried to find it for you but Google just gives Muslim results.

I'm not sure, but the guy from Star Trek the movie?

FALSE FLAG!!!

maybe he wanted to go to prison

Confirmation bias, among other things.

People who are unstable, stupid, lazy, careless or some combination of those things, are as less likely to look after themselves physically as they are more likely to leave a trail when they break the law. This doesn't mean only full blown degenerates are criminals, it just means a much higher proportion of them get caught, so that is who you see.

>second-degree possession
So to be clear, he printed a drawing and he will spend years in jail for this? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA GODDAMN AMERICA HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

I really hope it's not his drawing, otherwise it's not possession, it's production and he'll be in jail for half of his life

Fuck em. Modern Darwinism at play

>fuck artists who draw lolis
No fuck you sir. Those people are real life heroes risking their lives.

Where in the article does it say it was drawings?

It does say second-degree possession. The hell is that? Either just photos of girls being girls or non-IRL depictions

I suppose its because only the most redarded ones that get caught and retarded people look retarded.

this is the "child pornography" in question

thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=spot_the_pedo

yes, I missspelt retarded

I'm off

dubz

>Sup Forums - Television & Film
??????

Not sure. Maybe images that existed already. Not ones he had created.