Direct 4 of the most acclaimed films of all time IN A ROW

>direct 4 of the most acclaimed films of all time IN A ROW
>create nothing but trash afterwards

what the hell happened?

Literally almost died making Apocalypse Now. Decided to never push himself to that limit again. Made easy safe studio fare from that point forward.

Light that burns twice as bright...

Dracula was fucking awesome though

Apocalypse now happened.

A more interesting question would be what the fuck happened to ridley scott

>A more interesting question would be what the fuck happened to ridley scott
Ridley Scott is the most consistent director of all time. Everything he's made is watchable.

even GI jane?

>ridley never made a bad movie
worst Sup Forums meme since it aint me starts playing

GI Jane has Viggo being an angry drill sergeant

He got really really into Wine.

Robin Hood
Prometheus
Matchstick Men
The Counselor
A Good Year
GI Jane
Exodus: Gods and Kings
The Martian

ALL SHIT

Suck My Dick.

I liked Dracula.

Take Matchstick Men and add Gladiator and I agree

>ALL SHIT

nah all good or great

>Matchstick Men
>The Counselor
These are legitimately great movies
>The Martian
>A Good Year
>Prometheus
>Exodus
These are decent

GI Jane and Robin Hood are the only ones that I have no desire to watch again.

>Rumble Fish
>Tetro
>Dracula
>One From The Heart
>Peggy Sue Got Married
>Tucker: The Man And His Dreams
>Youth Without Youth

He's had his misses and never reached the dizzying highs of his early career, but he's always been good.

He directed this

>Matchstick Men
>The Counsellor
>shit

Go back

Robin Hood was a genuine snorecore.

coasting off his early success? Or maybe he's one of those directors that is better off constrained. Notice how after blade runner he has producer credit on almost every one of his movies.

Notice how after Blade Runner he directed Legend which is the best fantasy movie of all time.

Forgot thelma & louise + basically everythong he did with russel crowe after gladiator, also hannibal I personally find shit but it's objectively not horrible

What's in it for me?

If you took the counselor's script and then rewrite all the character dialoge by an actual human beign, even that wouldn't make the counselor watchable, since it stars BOTH penelope cruz and cameron diaz. Also bin fassbender while you're at it. Also, bin ridley scott, then you're onto something mediocre as opposed to pure trash.

You sound like you might have a learning disability

>If you took the counselor's script and then rewrite all the character dialoge by an actual human beign, even that wouldn't make the counselor watchable, since it stars BOTH penelope cruz and cameron diaz. Also bin fassbender while you're at it. Also, bin ridley scott, then you're onto something mediocre as opposed to pure trash.
This is a reddit opinion.

No, I'm just drunk.

>le reddit
This isn't an argument

Go back

Go sober up and come back tomorrow. You stink.

woah I never knew people who liked that movie exist

Do you have less shitty opinions when you're sober?

>come back tomorrow
YES

No"

maybe

>matchstick men
>the counselor
I forbid you from ever posting on the internet ever again

There's no excuse for making Keanu do an English accent, but it's a great looking movie. Coppola is like a really arty Oliver Stone.

Also a big fan of Hanibal last time I saw it, but my friends hated it and just remained silent when I complimented the film.

matchstick men was good

you're shit

Brian De Palma sucks now too

Very funny!

he was never that great to begin with

>Ridley Scott is the most consistent director of all time.
uwotm8

Wow look at all the underrated kino you listed

"Anti-psychotic medication was a mistake"
- Francis Coppolla, 1987

Lost in Translation really fucked him up