Daily reminder that the 2nd Amendment saves fucking lives...

Daily reminder that the 2nd Amendment saves fucking lives. The Democrats want to take everyone’s guns away and import more gang members from Mexico to shoot innocent people, but Texas passed some sensible fucking gun laws and 6 dudes with guns were about to shoot that son of a bitch, but the first 2 shot him before the rest of them.

The 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution is the only equalizer for women’s rights and those who can’t fight with their fists to defend themselves. REMEMBER THIS SHIT LIBERALS. We are a free country because we have gun rights

Attached: BA7BC1F3-9755-4184-B552-32509B95ED3B.jpg (800x450, 254K)

Other urls found in this thread:

liveleak.com/view?t=9N4df_1577655564
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

The gov just took away your right to smoke. Nobody did anything. Next the gov will come for guns. Nobody will do anything.

THEY SHOULD HAVE TURNED THE OTHER CHEEK!

This video literally changed my views completely on the 2nd amendment, I'am thankful this happened to show an example of what carrying can do.

Attached: 31m0jhdqryf21.jpg (750x741, 44K)

We should all carry 24/7 and never blink.

good idea

This. Americans are cowards.

He was shot by a cop in the church almost immediately who had a pistol in a belt holster. The other folks with guns all hid at first - they were all really slow to react.
If it wasn't for the cop, he could have easily taken out more people.
The video is on live leak - liveleak.com/view?t=9N4df_1577655564

This.
Retired I believe. Dude made one hell of a head shot on a moving target, the first dude to attempt to pull his gun was not only carrying in the worst position, but he fumbled on the draw, which got him and another dude shot.
Then you had a bunch of morons coming down to the front flagging the shit out of everyone.
Don’t get me wrong, based Wilson saved the day but holy shit were there some idiots in that room

no churches I can think of would allow its members to carry around weapons. This place is sounds more like a cult than a religion

Attached: 87678567876896897897.jpg (1200x675, 113K)

Only one guy shot him. The other dude attempted to draw and got him and another member of the church shot because he was too slow.
Then the other dudes came down to the front. Still dumb as fuck to try that shit in texas

troll harder faggot

>assuming I’m going to ask for permission. Actually jokes on me because I had to get a permission slip from the government to carry concealed but you get the point

I agree, it was a hell of a head shot. Guys probably been shooting for decades.
I also noticed the late comers flagging everyone.

>no churches I can think of would allow its members to carry around weapons
ok moron, which churches don't allow their members to carry weapons then?

Attached: 1576526621872.png (649x611, 639K)

Motherfucker, have you ever been in the South? We carry guns everywhere.

Adventism

Churches in civilised countries without your retarded hur-dur guns are great mindset

Video is a proof of concept
Gun rights dont do shit when it doesn't come with mandatory training on gun use

Kim il sung is better

do they check? nope, I didn't think so.

Attached: 1554329514861.jpg (1252x1252, 78K)

Only thing I’m mad about is that now 357 sig is about to become more popular. Been my edc for a hot minute and now every gung-ho fuck is gonna want one

>civilized

Attached: 1569150901802.png (706x815, 582K)

In Japan, banning all guns saves more lives. Just saying. I’m a gun owner myself, but it is what it is. Second amendments gets a shit ton of people killed as well. Again, it is what it is. Do your thing.

You don't need a 2nd amendment since self preservation should be everyone's right, yes even "assault weapons" and "fully automatic guns" should be allowed

I'm 40 but sure

Because Japan is crime ridden like the US. Gun restrictions work when youre in a country that doesn't have gang bangers dealing drugs and fighting over street terriotry in your inner cities, like japan

>mandatory training.
Yes and no.
Could anyone have put a shot on that dude, at that distance? Absolutely. But a single head shot on a moving target is a bit different.
There’s a shit ton of terrible places to get training. For all we know the first dude to go for his gun coulda been a laser. But he was carrying like a fudd in the small of his back, and he probably had a metric fuck ton of adrenaline dumping at that moment, which you really can’t always practice.
That and you gotta figure it takes a certain kind of person that’s willing to shoot at someone, and I bet there’s a large percentage of regular ass gun owners that aren’t.

>Self preservation
U know anybody that has lived forever?

>japan
>lack of minorities
>completely different culture
>but the same shit will work in a completely different culture with a different background
Sure Jan.

Unfortunately we have people here that want the Government to take care of everything and babysit us.

So you're saying trying to survive is pointless? Then kill yourself, faggot.

/thread.
My fucking shotgun has a pistol.

>he could have easily taken out more people.
Do you think you're making a good point here?

Yes, the guy who killed him was a good shot. Yes, if that guy had missed or not been there, the gunman would have killed 3, 4, 5, or even 6 people.

Do you think that's a good point?? Seriously?? Did you actually think about this??

IF NOBODY HAD A GUN, HE WOULD HAVE KILLED 50 PEOPLE LIKE WHAT HAPPENED IN NEW ZEALAND

None of those old boomers would have escaped. He would have killed them all. As it turns out, he killed only 2. If badass boomer hadn't been there, he would have killed 3, 4, 5, or 6. But any of these outcomes is better than what would have happened if nobody else was armed.

You're an absolute fucking retard. I can't believe you typed that out and thought it was a meaningful statement.

Attached: 1575800024178.jpg (642x593, 33K)

The 2nd amendment is the REAL REASON you fucking rednecks are dying. No checks on metal health = Free guns, free ammo, free killing GOOD JERB!

Thinks if he didnt have a gun, same as NZ, GOOD JERB MURICAN FAT FAG! Uses mass killing in other countries as an example xD Go die under a rock man!

Where are these free guns and ammo you speak of?
Also if we had an actual “gun problem” it’d be way worse considering the amount of firearms we have in circulation here.
We for sure have a mental health problem in this country though so you’re 1 for 2

Ay bro guns are cool and all but the most important part about having them out in a population like this is making sure the right people have them. We need to be looking for different ways so solve the problem, not throwing blame at the dems. In this example we can clearly see both the right and wrong people that should be armed, so why are we just letting everyone have weapons in good faith when we can work to make sure they can both be the right people? This whole situation could have been avoided if the shooter had gotten help from the right people at the right time. Posts like this do not move towards a solution, they do the opposite and stagnate the problem.

Attached: gun cheems.png (1636x1556, 1.2M)

none of that makes sense.

If you manage to think of a response that you can articulate, please let me know. Here are my points:

(1) a mass shooting is bad

(2) the guy who 360 no-scoped the shooter limited the killing to only 2

(3) if not for that guy, the other armed people would have limited the killing to under 6

(4) but if nobody was armed, everyone would be dead

And your (stupid) point appears to be that (3) is worse than (2) which is true, but meaningless because (4) is worse than (3)

I mean if nobody had a gun that dude could have dusted AT LEAST 6 people. I haven’t seen anyone say what kind of shotgun he used.. Just gonna guess it wasn’t that big considering it was under a coat.

Reports are saying the church actually gave him help at one point or another, he was also judged mental unfit to stand trail for some shit.
The problem with
>we just don’t want THESE people to have guns
Is it infringes on my normal ass’s rights. And be it me, or the dude up the street, it’s wrong. multiple millions of gun owners in the country every day don’t shoot people yet we continue to get bent over backwards to “keep people safe” and little by little 2A rights are taken away

(5) if nobody, shooter included, had access to firearms, nobody would be dead, unless he stabbed a guy, big whoop

>we ban guns
>then nobody will ever have guns, ever.
You realize that’s not how it works right?

>if nobody, shooter included, had access to firearms, nobody would be dead
Lots of people would be dead through, for example, home invasions.

But, I guess you don't care about that.

You know what’s illegal? Cocaine.
You know what I can get way easier than a gun? Cocaine.

US citizens have the 2nd amendment, in France we have nothing .... only laws that prevent citizens from being armed, so we pay the price !! the Bataclan, 90 people massacred and defenseless while outside the authorities were playing to find out who had the authority to intervene! .. and better, while the killers were killing their victims, soldiers present outside the theater refused to intervene without orders, we are nothing more than a people of sheep waiting for the executioner!

You think your free? You cower behind your guns becuse you are afrade. You only hate becuse you fear. You are not a man with a gun you are a cowerd hideing under your bed

None of you seemed to notice the words "had access to firearms" which were not the words "firearms were banned" there's a difference between firearms being banned and there being no access to firearms. In the US a felon is banned from firearms, but still has access. To the fag with the cocaine example, go to japan or something and try to find your coke, you wont, thats the difference between a retarded government with no control like the US and one that does have control

right. what would the French resistance have been without arms?

Alright there big dick plan maker. What’s your process then?
How does a felon still have access of they’re banned? They’re already violating the law right there.
> To the fag with the cocaine example, go to japan or something and try to find your coke, you wont, thats the difference between a retarded government with no control like the US and one that does have control
Yes because when I think of places I want to live my life, I think of places where the government has more control.
Take the boot out of your mouth you weak fuck

Having trouble finding the comment saying to take away all guns.

You keep using Japan as if it’s an apples to apples comparison. You do realize it’s they are two wildly different places right?

It’s more or less this one but with more nonsense

it saved lives this time but if you are looking overall it destroy more lives.

I'm more concerned that conservatives think guns are the only thing granting them freedom.
>Shhhh don't think too hard about it conservatives. Just feel comfort that the NRA is protecting you from all of the crimunuls and terrurists.

Attached: f5kdyvwit6o01.jpg (1230x1309, 157K)

Nothing ....unarmed in the face of a dictatorship, no chance of winning

>it saved lives this time but if you are looking overall it destroy more lives.
deaths from tobacco use kill 10x the number of murder from guns yet cigarettes are still legal. Want to save lives? Outlaw tobacco.

How many shootings has the perpetrator had a history of mental illness? Almost every mass shooting story I have read, someone brings up the fact that the shooter has a history of mental disorders. What can be done about it is another matter altogether.

Unfortunately this.

You are the very definition of idiot. KYS

Kek. The NRA has been a meme for years. But keep thinking we worship them. They’ve been more of a friend to the left than anything else

This 1000% times.
And everyone can talk all the shit they want but once the power is out and life stops being comfortable they’ll buckle. Sad times when the shit would have already kicked off if people had half the balls the founders did

English pls.