Is there any evidence of the moon landing being faked?

is there any evidence of the moon landing being faked?

Attached: 1073927.jpg (1199x2000, 216K)

Well, there isn't any evidence it wasn't faked either.

Attached: smug-autist.png (250x295, 174K)

Yes. For one, they went there during the day.

Burden of proof

if it were fake, Russia, China, or Japan would have all shown empty moon landing LZs by now. They all have moon landers and could easily fit a satalite with cameras that were designed to take detailed pics of the moon surface. The US claims to have SIX very specific moon landing sites. That's 6 places any of these countries could send their lander to show there is nothing there.
If the moon landing was fake, why dont they do this? Why would the USSR/Russia and China just pass up a chance to BTFO America forever? It would be well worth it. I'll tell you why that hasnt happened, because the moon landing happened.

Nope.

Indians have proven it was real with independent (not NASA) satellite imagery of the landing sites.

For laughs, all the US flags they left behind have sun bleached and are now white

There are mirrors panels up there you can use, just point a laser at them and measure how much it takes for the laser to come back. This was you can measure the distance between the moon and the earth, which is ever increasing.

No because we lost all the evidence of going, so stop asking about evidence, we lost it. Just grow old and continue giving NASA your money. You believe in science because science is proven but NASA isn't normal science, it may be that of a god.

The radiation would kill them, airless surface of the moon makes temperature in a shadow minus 280 F, there was no digital technology they used film, it could never survive the heat or the cold. Broadcasting the moon landing to the whole world,live, when they couldn't even broadcast live events to other countries. When the spacecraft leaves, you can see the camera follows them up? who did that? No pictures of the stars, because if they were visible everyone could proof it would be fake, my calculating the location. The moon rock they took home had a tree pieces in it... and so on so son

Attached: cara_ruined_whole_generation_of_women.jpg (2466x1232, 1.14M)

China tried to send a aircraft to the moon and failed, last year, something that states did in 1969, seven times and all that with computers that were 1,000 times slower than your phone. I could go on all day

How stupid can you be? Half the things you said are plain out wrong lol

The tapes got recorded over, they weren't that important

ok boomer

This was during the height of the Cold War. Russia would have loved to disprove the moon landing as a hoax. They couldn't because it was tracked by them and a few other nations. You know where to stick your conspiracy theories.

i also have answer for that, but maybe ill just use your approach and call you a faggot and an idiot

Bet you have an answer for Epstein's fate, too.

>it was tracked by them and a few other nations
Australia confirms it was real. We pointed our really big dish at the actual moon and a TV signal came up of funny dudes in diving suits.

Not him, but curious what it is.

Need more proof?

Attached: 1420089325816.jpg (1920x1080, 1.55M)

No just idiots asking if there is.

planting things on the moon is one thing.
Another thing is actually landing people on the moon.

There was that mythbusters episode that was said to prove that the video would have been real if the landing was
About not seeing the stars. You need a really good exposure on even modern day cameras to actually see the stars. Remember the low quality of video? Not gonna see shit.
One theory is that they faked the landing then actually did it later is disguise of another mission just in case they had to do so again so one of the greatest achievements in technology will not become a laughing stock.
Also the camera could have been in a special housing (just like the astronauts) to prevent radiation and temperature damage

thinking that special housing can prevent that kind of radiation.

I found this pic

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg_fit=1280%2C720.jpg (1280x720, 143K)

also the quality of the cameras is bullshit, look at the qualities on the pictures, there is no atmosphere on the moon, people send telescopes in orbit to get clearer photos. If you took a picture in space, you would see all of the stars.

even cheaper... back in the day when US was sending men up there and USSR was a direct competitor they could have triangulated the radio signals and told everybody.

>you would see all of the stars
Learn photography. They used high (motion stopping) shutter speed and low aperture for high DOF on high ISO film stock. There wasn't enough time in the exposure to collect light from relatively dim stars against the sunlit foreground.

Wierdo