Redpill me on climate change

Redpill me on climate change.

Attached: htr.jpg (1080x1350, 178K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ketotic.org/2015/03/meat-is-best-for-growing-brains.html
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/diagnosis-diet/201903/the-brain-needs-animal-fat
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17374691
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03670244.2018.1536657
telegraph.co.uk/news/9158235/Red-meat-halves-risk-of-depression.html
phys.org/news/2011-06-farming-blame-size-brains.html
climate.nasa
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_documents
quora.com/Did-30-000-scientists-declare-that-climate-change-is-a-hoax
riteon.org.au/14000-abandoned-wind-turbines-litter-the-united-states/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

She is 17 now right?

She looks seriously underdeveloped.

How bout you go and do your own fucking research. Read some shit about the actual science and stop hoping some basement dweller can educate you on Sup Forums

She's an autist dude.

That is rather obvious is it not?
I mean the Earth is in a state of constant change, so is the cosmos.
Climate is ALWAYS changing.

This. There are literally hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific papers challenging various aspects of the AGW "consensus." The divergence problem alone puts a stake through the heart of any temperature dataset using tree rings as proxies--which is all of them attempting to claim radical temperature changes in the past century--but this is completely avoided by the "consensus."

That's because she's vegan, meat is especially important for growth, mental health and cognition.

ketotic.org/2015/03/meat-is-best-for-growing-brains.html
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/diagnosis-diet/201903/the-brain-needs-animal-fat
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17374691
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03670244.2018.1536657
telegraph.co.uk/news/9158235/Red-meat-halves-risk-of-depression.html
phys.org/news/2011-06-farming-blame-size-brains.html

>growing-brains

how many of them?

he meant physically retard

climate change is a humbug

just earn money, smoke weed, and fuck bitches!
let future problems solved be the future people

Post one. You can’t and you won’t because there aren’t any compelling ones made that have not been debunked.

Most important thing to know is not that the climate is changing, but that it is changing at a much faster pace than in the past. Climates have often changed on this planet... The problem when it changes too quickly is that nothing can adapt in time. That includes a lot of humans. It's the factor time, it's not the factor temperature. At least in my opinion.

Fetal alcohal syndrome among many other things

Attached: 1578305398039.jpg (587x556, 26K)

fuck a bitch preggers and let the future baby fend for itself
sound logic

What is today; pbut yesterday’s tomorrow.

>climate change is a humbug
Climate change is real, the climate has been changing for 4.5 billion years, but the people pushing for climate action are seeking a payday more than anything else. They want carbon credits to become a new tradeable commodity so they can cash in.

This. The climate will always change and will always go through various cycles, it's been happening since the dawn of time and there does not exist one single scrap of scientific EVIDENCE humans have any impact on climate change, simply fund biased cherry picked consensus.

Attached: 1575546596209.jpg (1280x1544, 242K)

No one can deny this. You pathetic climate change deniers need to go back. Not one of you faggots can post proof.

So would you say all those studies done by researchers all over the globe are only there to prove that science and green politics are greedy? Wouldn't you say that if it were possible to convincingly prove that it's not humans causing the ACCELERATED climate change, they would have done so by now? You sincerely think this is all just one big conspiracy designed to fill up AOC's and Bill Nye's pockets? Oh come on.

The biggest redpill is a scientific redpill. Saving and spreading these. Cheers user.

Is it gay to fluff a bull?

Generally, I like to get my bull nice and hard for my wife before he breeds her with his potent jungle seed.
However, this has become a source of conflict for both myself and my bull. He tried to claim that I was bisexual or homosexual for sucking him off, but I told him that by that logic he wouldn't be heterosexual either. My bull then argued that you are only gay if you suck dicks, not if you get your dick sucked.
From that point we argued in circles, he got upset, and he slapped me in the face with his penis before locking me in my cuck shed.
Still, I feel as though I was in the right. I'm sure people here will agree with me that sucking dick is completely heterosexual if I was just prepping him. It's no different than heterosexually sucking a woman's penis.

Try to prove that the climate is changing not because humans but because nature?
How the fuck are you supposed to prove that?

It's like asking for proof that Santa does not exist.

In a nutshell, since the start of the industrial revolution, we've put so much shit in to the air, landfills and the oceans that we've fucked with the naturally changing temperature of the Earth, speeding the cycle up - which is bad, mmmkay

Attached: Mr-mackey.jpg (700x450, 35K)

Stolen my childhood is probably the dumbest thing she’s ever said.

It is another hoax in a seemingly endless parade of leftist hoaxes. Designed to give meaning and wealth to otherwise useless idiots.

Attached: 1573243368692.jpg (598x960, 108K)

How about the statistical data you can look at that shows us how the planet has been heating up exponentially since the industrial revolution? See the post of Mr. Mackey above. It's not really difficult to see correlation. I say correlation, not causation. The problem is when numberless studies confirm the correlation, it becomes adequate to suggest some form of causation. Or to take up your lovely example, if 1000 studies show that there never was a sighting of Santa on Christmas, there's a fair degree of certainty that there is no Santa. But hey, perhaps science will prove me wrong. I'm pretty sure the dumbass climate change deniers in congress won't do that.

Btw, speaking of correlation: Have a look at who is denying climate change in American politics and then have a look at who is sponsoring their campaigns. Koch energy and others, usually. People who do not want any body to get away from fossile fuels. Big wow.

>we've fucked with the naturally changing temperature
Post proof

They first labelled it Global Warming and since no one gave a fuck they renamed it Climate Change, the only scientists that believe this are Climatologists aka nothing short of a biased group that exists to only justify the existence of man-made climate change, that's it. Climatology didn't even exist till the 80's, therefore it's just a science that exists out of propaganda.

Attached: 203_co2-graph-061219.jpg (1280x800, 491K)

Climate change and global warming are two separate things, you mongoloid - One was never renamed the other. Global warming is a resulting effect of climate change.

mongs don't believe in facts nor understand statistics, I'm afraid you're preaching to deaf ears

>People who do not want any body to get away from fossile fuels.
The same people who say “hurr dis study was funded by da oil companies” can’t even fathom the studies they’re citing also have certain political interests with ulterior motives backing them.

How are you fags still passing around this fake graph?

that is propaganda not facts-

>fake

It's from NASA, prove them wrong, I'll literally hold your dick as you pick up your award for your groundbreaking research

Your graph ignores the middle age warming period and the little ice age. People still believing this propaganda shows how stupid all the climate alarmists are.

>nasa
>fake news
kek

What interests? Im intereseted.

>NASA is a credible organization of unbiased scientists
lol

yeah, not to mention the Cambrian Explosion-

that is literally from Nasa...

climate.nasa DOT gov/evidence/

And you seem to be ignoring the sudden spike in temperature, which just so happens to coincide with recent heavy industry

Why deny it? Of course they do. All studies get funds from somewhere. I hope you do acknowledge at least that a study on global warming that is sponsored by oil companies has a conflict of interest. It's like a tobacco company sponsoring a study on lung cancer.

Of course everybody has their own agenda. I'm from Western Europe, green parties over here regularly want to forbid all kinds of stuff. Or pass new laws forbidding the use of fossile or atomic energy. It's just the way the world turns.

The fundamental flaw in your post is the assumption that climate change alarmist are rational people. It's real in their minds and that is all that counts.

Let me say it better for you, they used the term Global Warming as a campaigning tool then once people found that Global Warming was bunk they rebranded as Climate Change in 2018. It's nothing more than a bunch of people trying to sell you an idea that they hope you start buying 'eco-friendly' shit out of their subsidized sponsored pockets.

I bet this guy is german

Two of the biggest fund biased pro-camps are NOAA and NASA. They are well known to falsify their data, relying on sensationalism to achieve public support and continued funding.

Additionally, their "climate scientists" are nearly always radical left, so nothing they produce can have any validity.

Attached: 1578313979445.jpg (735x631, 119K)

>inb4 TX/AZ becomes uninhabitable due to extreme temperatures

gl backtracking later on retards

So everything you disagree with cant be trusted. Thats very interesting. Can you prove this falsified data?

>things Al Gore told me
kek

Global warming: the increase in Earth’s average surface temperature due to rising levels of greenhouse gases.

Climate change: a long-term change in the Earth’s climate, or of a region on Earth.

Within scientific journals, this is still how the two terms are used. Global warming refers to surface temperature increases, while climate change includes global warming and everything else that increasing greenhouse gas amounts will affect.

Yeah, NASA, NOAA, ESA and all those privately funded research universities, plus all those other universities around the world are all staffed by Marxist-Leninist revolutionaries on a mission to spread humbug in the name of science. Get lost, Fox News viewer.

Nice semantic, you tumor.

Tesla only source Cobalt from North America, so....

The media uses them interchangeably though.

Mildest summer the AZ has seen in years. Most snow/rain it has seen in years as well in 2019.

>muh climate change
>uninhabitable

Shut the fuck up.

So stop paying attention to outlets who use either term incorrectly, the media is what you choose it to be, not one entity.

Conflating weather with climate.

Are you saying it snow in the summer?

mildest winter scandinavia has had in years

what's your point

How can you be this brainwashed. I don't even get it.

That site posts all of it's sources. All of them. Thousands of research articles from all over the planet.

Over 97% of scientist agree that Climate Change is real, and humans/what we have done in the recent past has had the biggest effect on it.

This is literally the same as being anti-vax. You find some random ass articles that state it isn't an issue and latch onto them, instead of believing the mass majority of them.

Let me ask you this. Do you think it is something like, "Big Solar" etc funding these articles and paying off all of these scientists? Are you insane. Even if that many people sold out, they would sell out to the oil industry, they have more money and are more established.

I just don't get it. How can you be in so much denial?

Endless examples out there, some of the biggest climate change researchers all admitted in private emails that got leaked that they had to doctor their findings to support the theory that mankind was changing the climate. The climate changes we've experienced are all part of the Earth's natural cycle.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_documents

Who gives a Fuck? The corporations keep right on polluting and suppressing alternative energy sources that threaten their profits. If the people in control don't care why should I?

Or any of the other shit she's ever said at a podium.

The fuck.

Your brain is melted.

Thank you, user. A word of reason in a den of aspiring Fox News pundits.

True but that one is super easy to debunk. There’s literally no reason to suggest that her childhood has been “stolen” by the evil global warming deniers.

To be fair liberals now think summer is global warming.

Ok but if we’re going to see “catastrophe effects” in just 12 years, shouldn’t we be seeing some now?

There is no 97% consensus. That is a debunked lie.

Read this article, it’s posted on a very liberal website even.

quora.com/Did-30-000-scientists-declare-that-climate-change-is-a-hoax

>Polar Bears are starving to death
>Australia literally on fire
>O-Zone layer shrinking
>CO2 levels highest ever
>entire species of animals are becoming near extinct (outside the already dwindling life from human harvesting)

How? Nobody says that the earth is warming up simply because you have a fucking nice summer and a horrible winter. That's WEATHER. There's a difference between that and CLIMATE.

Remember when some dumbass in congress brought in a snowball and claimed that it's proof that there is no climate change? Well, it's the same thing when you claim climate change is not real because of some weather phenomenon in the place you live that seems to disprove everything. It's dumb.

Man made climate change (aka Global Warming) is a hoax.

Attached: HO-HO-HOAX.jpg (443x360, 85K)

This. Natural climate change deniers are primarily raving liberal lunatics

Attached: 1574528015986.jpg (960x894, 87K)

Unsee this, bish

Attached: 1578269956097~2.jpg (379x380, 30K)

But how can you prove that the fires are due to climate change? There have always been fires.

Did you even read that? I guess not.

You can't. But you can compare the fires. How often, how intense, where, how long. And it's not hard to see that what is happening right now is sincerely fucked up

This has got to be the stupidest thing ever

ITT: spastics not understanding how the greenhouse effect works. Go back to school lmao, there is no denying it, unless you're willingly retarded

Also, global warming can also cause the arctic to become colder in some regions apparently.

They could start using Hemp as a cleaner source of manufacturing a lot of things. Henry Ford even built a car out of hemp and ran it on hemp oil, said the doors on it were stronger than steel. That was back in 1928. It could easily replace a lot of this plastics bullshit, But hey, we need jobs, not a planet to live on.

That is where it gets interesting. While most scientist agree that we are causing it, and it is real. The last 20 years of research have shown that it might not be as harmful as we thought. In some cases, it could be good.

In other words, there is 0 question on if it is real, or that we are causing it. The real scientific debate right now is, is that bad/how bad is it?

The problem with that is, every year we have seen higher temps. And there is no real way to fix the things we are changing, at least not in any reasonable time with modern science. So if we do discover that, "Opps, it really was bad." We are super fucked. Because we can't backtrack.

It's not inaccurate but it is incomplete. The trick is in "for millennia" on a planet billions of years old.

Here's a real CO2 chart

Attached: 1576082825095.jpg (960x720, 95K)

Also, while I 100% agree with trying to tackle climate change. The aussie fires are from stupid ass liberal legislation that didn't allow controlled burning. It is exactly what happened in Cali.

"We can't burn the forest, it is unnatural and will hurt the animals."

Well, guess what... all the animals are dead now. Good job!

Saved.

Yeah. Like in a couple of spots while the rest is melting away.

But on a more serious note, climate change could fuck up Europe quite royally. If the Gulf stream stops (no flow of warm water to Europe), Europe may actually start to cool down pretty badly. At the same time Western Europe could also face increased Mediterranean climate. It's probably not so easy to say which model could work. Predictions are kinda hard, no serious scientist will deny that.

So then you admit that the left is pushing alarmist bullshit?

Do people really think scientists across the globe are joined in one massive conspiracy? Do people not realise how much of the world economy is literally fed by oil alone? Who on earth has the influence to outpay oil companies and car companies. Big Solar Panel(tm)? Big Compost? Is it Elon Musk himself?

Haha did you even read that yourself? It doesnt prove falsified data. Its basically some emails were leaked, they were investigated but there couldnt be shown any fraud och alteration had been made so it was rejected. Good job user. Read it again.

Green energy is big business. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) are a big $$$ source and are traded on the markets, not to mention the multi-billion dollar grant funding available climbing aboard the coattails of natural climate change. Look at Nasa's funding for example.

Why does it matter that Western Europe may have a Mediterranean climate?

Read it. Literally the first paragraph states there were numerous trials about it, and enforcement agencies looked into it, as well as the scientific community. Was basically ruled as not an issue. The emails were never acted on, no wrong doing, etc...

Does it really surprise you that they got emails? I work for a college and I get random emails from big companies asking me in endorse shit. I would be shocked if they didn't get those emails.

Yo Greta's pussy tight tho.

The man who named, documented and categorized the imaginary consensus was Irving Janus in 1972.

implying a slight change in temperature won't significantly affect sea levels

So why don't US entrepreneurs get their fat asses moving and try to sell us something else than a Ford F-150? ^^ No seriously I don't get it. If there's so much to be had from going green, why don't they go for it? Might even create some of those jobs Trump is always talking about... Better than having your head up the ass of those couple thousand coal miners who are beating a dead horse anyways

The whole left/right is a bunch of bullshit. The two party system is just one of the many things wrong with the USA now. Do your own research and believe no one but your own opinions after reading all the sources from both sides.

The truth is, the left pushes it too hard. The right is just undeniably stupid about it though. They refuse to even say, "Climate Change is real" 99% of the time. Because they know most of their voter base would take that as, "OMG HE IS A LIBERAL SHILL NOW!!!!" instead of, "Ok, he agrees with scientist, but he didn't state is a serious issue that will harm us soon."

And notice that I didn't even state it isn't a serious issue that should be continued to be researched. I DO believe we should be cautious. This is the type of shit that you only get one chance with, be as cautious as you can.

>going green
riteon.org.au/14000-abandoned-wind-turbines-litter-the-united-states/