In a realistic scenario could a country with a shitty army like the Netherlands, Czech republic or Austria take on the 3rd Reich at their prime?
No nukes allowed let's say one of these countries has 40k men with experience and another 100k reservists against the whole army of the Reich but also think of newer vehicles, technology and weaponry
>inb4 someone gets in this thread and says "this is now a berserk thread" when posting a pic of guts
And why would Ukraine be able to win when they can't even win from a few seperatists
Brayden Wright
Absolutely not. Belgium military strategy was to noit really have an army because the Belgians excessively preparing for war got beat a little bit slower than the Belgians who didn't prepare for war at all.
Face it France and Germany are the two armies on that continent.
Daniel Scott
Sealand could probably.
Maybe even Molossia.
Joshua Reyes
With modern technology then probably yeah, they'd never be able to establish air control
Nazi technology isn't even North Korea tier
Juan Price
You would have guaranteed air superiority so if you could hold them off long enough to get your planes up you might stand a chance. The numbers would probably overwhelm you though.
only reason why Ukraine can not win against separatists is because separatists are Ukrainian, and they are the best fighters which make stalemate between army and separatists.
Ukrainian Army = Ukrainian Separatists > German troops
Cooper Evans
Not saying I disagree only 3 actually "powerful" armies are France UK and after those 2 Germany which still lacks alot from being actually powerful. Russia is the most powerful if you count them as European too even tho they are politically on the other side.
But my whole point is would like the statistics that I listed win from the 3rd Reich imagine F-16's and F-35's against the old German luftwaffen but also count in the quantity of both sides.
Hmm well I thought maybe nazi Germany could win on the ground since they have more people, working weapons even tho they suck compared to modern weapons but they would lose really bad at air battles.
(keep in mind the countries I listed don't have alot or even any tanks)
Exactly what I thought
Poland has too many citizens so that is why I didn't use them as example
I know some of us are pathetic but why would Ukraine win? But I don't believe Ukraine has a bigger chance against the Nazi's compared to like other nations
Connor Russell
Ukraine has a lot of reliable Soviet cold war weapons which can fuel war and unlike current nations in the west we are already grinding combat exp in Donbass.
Army with more patriotism would fight harder than Netherlands or Austria. The army would just roll over like they did in WW2
I also do not think any of those nations have mandatory military service.
Gavin Johnson
But your economy couldn't handle an invasion you are losing alot of money in the east already cause the separatists took over. Another attack in the west from a Nazi army? would be too much I think.
Your soldiers do probably have more experience yes.
It is only soldiers so not sure how they would fight. I think as long as they can keep up. Not sure about the ukranian army but didn't they retreat after losing the airport for example and other places that doesn't show a patriotism
No but that is why I said give them 140k soldiers in total with their current vehicles and weapons if they could actually beat the 3rd Reich
Samuel Ward
Communists and Nationalist Chinese united against Japan in WW2, Ukraine could also do the same.
Austria and the Netherlands are so small that they would fall to German quantity over their quality, Ukraine is much bigger so they could handle German numbers and dwindle them away as they slowly retreat south through guerrilla and urban warfare.
If worse comes to worse, they can just hole up in Crimea and blow the Germans to smithereens with their air force and artillery. (also keep naval superiority if they still have their navy?)
Other nations would not have a place to isolate themselves and slowly fatigue the Germans, while Ukraine does.
Economy wise, Ukraine can just take out a loan like other nations did in WW2.
Anthony Walker
Any one of those countries would blow the fucking Nazis out so fucking bad, holy shit. America vs. Iraq-tier. A single modern attack helicopter could obliterate hundreds, thousands of men by itself. Holy fucking SHIT imagine making this thread
John Nelson
Czech, at the time, had a large military. They probably could have held a solid defense. They weren't backed by the other European powers when Hitler came knocking for the Sudetenland though. They got surrounded and shit on.
Tyler Powell
The only cunt that could have held off the Reich for any length of time was Poland, who really weren't doing badly at all until Russia gangbanged them from behind.
>N-Nazism was all about defeating the bolsheviks guys!
Christopher Long
>anime / manga as the thread opening image >on the political discussion board This is an anime thread
Justin Flores
The sheer volume of the Nazis' Air Force would overwhelm the air defense of a smaller modern European state and allow them to carpet bomb military installations.
Then on the ground the Nazis would still have an overwhelming numbers advantage with equipment that, while inferior, is not incapable of doing damage to modern armies.
Ironically, Nazi Germany would win against a modern European state for the same reasons the Soviets beat the Nazis.
Zachary Richardson
Nukes!?
Not even needed.
Modern communication alone (including GPS) would tilt the odds heavily enough, but modern missile and vehicle technology would mean the Reich would be defeated in days or possibly hours.
Samuel Smith
>N-Nazism was all about defeating the bolsheviks guys! Half of it was. The other half was securing a future for Germans, which Poland was directly interfering with.
Nathaniel Nguyen
Don't even need the whole country.
One modern airforce base or battleship could defeat the entire Reich in a very short time.