Britain I understand, but Norway?

Britain I understand, but Norway?

>British empire
>WW2
And Brits call Americans on not knowing history

>implying map

The Norwegian resistance was based in the UK, and the Norwegian government in exile were also in London. NRK, the Norwegian broadcaster was also based in London during the war, and the Norwegian resistance, MILORG, were given British commando training, and they used mostly British weapons and equipment.

>The Norwegian resistance was based in the UK
How do you resist while in another country hundreds of miles away?

George VI still had the title of "Emperor" until 1948.

>france

>the majority of Europe has fallen for Americuck propaganda
You literally did the least out of the three main allied powers.
It still existed then. A lot of Australians, Canadians, Indians, etc fought for us.

They resisted safely in the UK, while Norway was one of the parts of Europe that didn't fall before the capitulation. Most of them probably didn't really care about the Nazis, since they would've been part of the überprivileged nordic model countries anyway.

The high command was based there, and they were trained in Scotland, kind of hard to run that sort of thing when there are 300000 Nazis occupying your country.

If we're going to non meme here the USSR contributed the most to the victory for the allies.

don't fall for it

>le wannabe meme bait

There was a substantial resistance, and most citizens didn't cooperate with the Nazis, the few who did were prosecuted after the war and sentenced to hard labour in labour camps

we saved them and now they spend a Christmas tree every year to say thanks
the empire fought alongside us in ww2 you idiot, it was only in the aftermath that the empire died

Wrong, they all think the USA did everything, except leftist college students who will say the USSR did it all

>french people literally and unironically believe this
dying

>except leftist college students
Anyone educated will give Soviets the biggest credit, whether they're leftist or not.

>most of the westerners unironically think that US contributed most to win WW2
What is wrong with you?

They don't. See:

>english people literally and unironically believe this
dying

typical self-aggrandization from a privileged white boy. Cry more about the great efforts your people did that amounted to nothing, while all of Europe actually fought a proper war and suffered.

>British people literally and unironically believe MS Paint tier maps without sources on Sup Forums

howling

UK being that important is equally laughable.

>What is wrong with you?
Decades of American propaganda.

>dying

more like surrendering

> literally and unironically believing a chart literally made in paint with no sources

You don't have to be a leftist to know the USSR did the most

Found the real one

>hon hon hon white flag surrendering snails eaters

which part of that is inaccurate?

...

no it's not

Norway was the country that lasted the longest after German invasion except for the Soviet Union, and the first victory against the Nazis was in Norway, in the strategically important city Narvik, we didn't just capitulate like the Danes did.

>posting the fake one

I think it's USSR personally but regardless we still done 100x more than the french
germs would never say that

People just hate Russians. Like we actually declared war upon you because we hate your guts, then failed horribly and got raped, made into a shitty, oppressed satellite, rebelled, got beaten down into a miserable third world shithole and after all this you'd trust our opinion on you?

>le fronce surrendered once to the most powerful army ever hon hon hon so funny

Well it's not about opinion it's just about common sense.

Yeah, that was really weak bait on my behalf.

Why do Africans, immigration leftover, potato farm animals, denbtz and the likes think nignog Mexicans did something, if the war was made by the death of a bazillion Soviets?

Even if you did most to make this world into a jewpuppet, nigger-infested socially degraded hellhole, that's all the more reason to spite R*ssia at every possible step. So fuck you, the USA saved Europe and without them we'd be speaking German or even worse, R*ssian.

>Faroe Islands still say America
Our greatest allies.

Because muh beaches of Normandy and shiet.

70 years of yank propaganda can do amazing things

without our resources they would have been fighting germany with actual sticks
they contributed the most people, even more than china though

...

...

>most powerful army

you had more tanks and guns in the battle of France than us and we only had 50,000 more troops than you. Other than air support we had no huge advantage.

People like to see ww2 as the
>good guys won
With Stalin you couldn't sell that. Simple as that.

need a giant cock to suck right now

that's only because France wasn't an option in that survey

>Lend-Lease agreement allowed Britain and especially Russia to keep fighting
>Almost single-handedly defeated Japan
>Basically fought two wars at the same time on different sides of the planet
>"lol America did nothing"

meet me in Hyde park at 8pm

>without our resources they would have been fighting germany with actual sticks
Well you are exaggerating this, but land lease was important anyway.
But without Soviet resistance USA and UK wouldn't win this war, no chances. And since we killed MUCH more nazis than you, it's definetely USSR who contributed most.

you're counting allies in (so english) even tho they didn't fought and escaped at Dunkrik.

A total of $50.1 billion worth of supplies was shipped, or 17% of the total war expenditures of the U.S. In all, $31.4 billion went to Britain, $11.3 billion to the Soviet Union, $3.2 billion to France, $1.6 billion to China, and the remaining $2.6 billion to the other Allies.
That's chump change, and they provided it for 4.5 years (March 11, 1941 and ended in September 1945). For comparison, in a single year (1945) the USSR spent 17 times that ($192 billion). If we assume the 11.3 billion was spread out equally, then the US contributed a measly 2.5 billion in 1945. That equates to a total US contribution of 1.3% of the USSR war budget.

The resources the USSR received where of really great help for them but it's exaggerated how much they got and how much it actually affected the outcome with many historians even debating that the USSR would win no matter if they got/were sold resources from the US. What the USSR mainly received were trucks and raw material.

And in all honestly, the Soviet killed 80% of the nazis, the eastern front was the single biggest front in world history and the other fronts are small in comparison. I'm not trying to discredit the US or any other ally but the USSR contributed the most, by a huge margin for the allies victory isn't some rusky propaganda.

nobody claimed you didn't contribute you triggered yanktard
at the end of the day you did less than us and USSR and purposely waited for Britain to bankrupt itself until you entered the war

>without our resources they would have been fighting germany with actual sticks
Not true. The Soviet Union had already halted the German offensives long before lend-lease equipment started arriving, and their (German) losses were unsustainable. They were also producing quite a lot compared to the Germans, and had an abundance of natural resources, like oil, that the Germans didn't have.

it worked out well before

and you wernt going to give up your colonies without that little extra pressure

>your own allies had no faith that you'd be able to defend your home land and got the fuck out before you'd had time to sober up from the lunch time wine

wew, lad

>anglos are perfidious
yeah we know, how was your school trip to aushwitz tho ?

This is false. The Dunkirk evacuation happened because we were cut off from the rest of the French forces.

>I'm German

You should know better.

British empire was still the biggest empire during ww2

pay your debts then

>öögasch böögasch
Here's your lunch. Now fuck off, there are people discussing.

the guys who blew up nazi things were trained in the uk

It's a fake map made by the OP, you low IQ.

>they would've been part of the überprivileged nordic model countries anyway.

These sorry lads from Bergen would probably not agree with you if they had survived the concentration camp