WHY WOULD WE RENEW TRIDENT!?!?!

WHY WOULD WE RENEW TRIDENT!?!?!

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_Nuclear_Disarmament
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

To nuke Mecca

Because explosions

Cause it's based and kek wills it.

So Gerry doesn't get Nucelar Ideas

nothing's kek about a bombs m8

the threat of mutual destruction is a good way to keep peace

>Not wanting a strong nuclear deterrent

Why are britbongs so uptight about trident? Our nuclear arsenal isn't even a matter of discussion in the US.

Its sad we have to have merica make our Nuclear bombs. They might hide a secret launch button and fucking set them off and fuck us over real good.

If you cant make something like that yourself then fuggedabouit.

Even the useless French make their own nuclear shit.

In which case every country on the planet should have nuclear weapons lol

BUY OUR 92

ye
The mutual destruction thing is so pointless though how about everyone just disarm

>ye
I mean, if you legitimately believe that then fair enough but in that case the government should immediately stop putting pressure on Iran and the DPRK to stop developing weapons.

Too many communist sympathisers

because the scots don't want it

only leftist champagne socialists are uptight about trident. im pretty sure you have them in your country aswell

>how about everyone just disarm
>implying we have any means to persuade our enemies to disarm without a nuclear deterrent
Are leftists really this fucking retarded?

>im pretty sure you have them in your country aswell

Yeah but almost no one takes them seriously. They have no political power.

Whereas you guys have an entire party dedicated to opposing trident which has 54 seats in your parliament

>our enemies
Who would those be?

It's a legacy of the Cold War. The KGB invested a lot of time and effort setting up an anti-nuclear advocacy group in this country and their remnants are in charge of Labour at the moment.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_Nuclear_Disarmament

The muzzies, the Russians, the French. Take your pick.

>implying we actually have nuclear weapons
We all know we got rid of them but aren't mentioning it, so that our enemies still believe we have a deterrent, but we don't have to actually pay for them.

>Whereas you guys have an entire party dedicated to opposing trident

first ive heard of this

Countries that want to dominate and control the world, so that would be, you know, any country which has the opportunity to.

Not surprised that lefties don't understand the concept of opposition, since they allow millions of them pour in through the front door every year.

do you know how irrisponsible it is to "dispose" of nukes?

>punishment is capital.

He must mean the SNP, they have 54 seats

yeah they should, lead by example though

Isn't abolishing trident the SNP's second issue besides "muh independence"

Self defence. That's why it's a deterrent.

One of Corbyn's main policies when he came to be leader of Labour was the removal of our nuclear arsenal

>the muzzies
are attacking us anyway and aren't a restricted within convenient borders

>the Russians
???

>the French
Implying that counts as a nation state

>Countries that want to dominate and control the world
Lmao the only countries doing that with military aggression atm is us and our allies

i dont know much about those limp wristed scottish faggots, only scotcucks take em seriously

Underrated post lol, The IRA gets nuclear ideas and Britain is done, they won't read far enough to learn about fallout lol.

Russia has an economy smaller than Italy and a military budget smaller than Saudi Arabia. The only reason anyone takes them seriously is because they can blow up the world if they wanted to. No nukes = no one cares about what you do.

Walk quietly but carry a big stick
or something like that.

Yeah it is, although the main reason they oppose trident, is because the English are in favour of it.

If the English were against trident, then the jocks would be for it, complaining about all the Scottish jobs at stake if we got rid of it.

>thinks having nuclear weapons ourselves is a component of persuading other countries to disarm their nuclear weapons
fucking retarded goon

Not having nuclear deterrence is like bringing a knife to a gun fight. As good as your knife might be its not a gun, and people will use that against you.

>Lmao the only countries doing that with military aggression atm is us and our allies
When we don't, they will. And it will be much, much worse. The west isn't perfect but it's so far the only civilisation to ever give a single fuck about human rights and freedoms.

brit abroad here

i can't believe how many bongs are anti trident

why not go suck off corbyn while you're at it?

>fucking retarded goon
This. This was exactly the problem with the Cold War. The sovs kept asking us to disarm and we were like "nah" and then they were like "fuck it" and built them themselves.

Nukes aren't real.

This money best be going towards Ayy Lmao lasers and shit, and not bunkers for the rich to ride out WW3 while everyone else starves.

>Not surprised that lefties don't understand the concept of opposition
well they the fuck is the right refusing to leave the opposition paradigm, there are enough resources to not have to compete

>so far the only civilisation to ever give a single fuck about human rights and freedoms
Lmfao what

Also using this logic, every single country on the planet should have nukes just so no one invades anyone.

Webm related

Not an argument. You are clearly fucking clueless as to how negotiation works. Yeah, let's give them the complete upper-hand in all negotiation and then ask them to give up their hand.

Leftist ideology should be added to the DSM. If not a form of brain damage, it's clearly some kind of mental illness of parasitism that prevents the host from making any rational inferences.

This was actually proposed by a famous American realist. Who said if you really want people everyone needs nukes.

fucking retard

If we stopped acting so fucking masculine and gave up our weapons I'm sure Russia would gladly give there's up as well

I think it's more the fact that we are by far the aggressor power on the geopolitical stage. The people who are the least responsible to have nuclear weapons should be the ones to shift and begin leading a global disarmament program.

"renew"

what's that even mean

Not an argument

Life is an "opposition paradigm". Unless you don't believe in evolution, retard? I'm surprised you can even see the screen with that much bullshit streaming out of you. Get your fucking head examined you 50 IQ mong.

In which case it's all fair game. Fuck the non-proliferation treaty and drop all of our sanctions on North Korea and Iran. Personally, i'd rather no one have nukes but it's not an acceptable situation where only some people can and some can't.

>not an argument **********irony
>you don't know how negotiation works
>uses some crap analogy of a card game to explain it
>pseudo-intellectual rhetoric
what a flaccid crap embarrassing post

In your native language it is reanudar.

Brown ID for a shit tier poster.
>>>/reddit/

>50 IQ mong
it's funny becuase I'm at the top postgrad uni in the world soz

So like more warheads? MIRV^2? Special anti-russian-anti-warhead-missile missiles? Who knows, sounds expensive and like a fucking straight up gift of money to the USA (probably) so I'm for it.

I mean just hand us a bunch of money and we'll give you a slight incremental improvement we made like 20 years ago, no biggie.

Drop off the money first tho.

never been to reddit

Trident is just a bunch of nuclear subs.

>calling entire nuclear effort after the American missile that made it even possible
You fucking bongs.

((( academia )))

Absolutely not an indicator of intelligence, sorry lad. Plenty of Oxbridge cunts who are thick as shit.

Don't renew, one nuclear Pakistan is enough.

Because it IS the entire nuclear effort. We have four subs carrying 16 missiles each and that's our entire nuclear armament.

So you can nuke Muslim France and Germany

because being able to raze every city in a country even when Britain has been sunk into the north sea is quite the bargaining chip

Stay mad hippy

Die

To keep our seat on the security council.

It's the only real justification. (The other one being that it lets us be more adventurist abroad since there's little need for conventional home defence, but our adventurism is rarely good.)

Too late you piece of shit

Not gonna be another vote for 30 years

Because I need my work