Describes a movie using the word "schlock"

>Describes a movie using the word "schlock"

>"uninspired"

>"it stinks"

>DAT ENDING
>DA ENDING SUKED
>WAT WAS WITH DA ENDING?
>SHIT ENDING
>COOL ENDING
>EPIC ENDING

>ENDING EXPLAINED

>People who say ''Film is supposed to be entertainment!''
>People who have 2001, Seven Samurai, Citizen Kane, other pleb shit on their top lists
>People who have seen 1 film made before the 50s and think they have taste
>People who like Wes Anderson and think they somehow have taste
>People with most movies on list made in last 20 years
>People who have no foreign language movies listed
>People who think korean cinema is good
>People who have movies from Nolan, Tarantino, Aronofsky, Kubrick, Refn, Snyder on their list
>People who have any comic book movie listed
>People who say comfy/based

>A tour de farce

>people who are reactionary

>its boring

>I prefer my films at 23.976fps

>compares movie to an episode of star trek

This thread is complete shlock.

>this movie doesn't have to be enjoyable because it bears a message

>it was bland

Shlock is just a term Film critics use so they can like dumb films while reserving their faux intellectual status

I am not familiar with this word.

What's wrong with that? Are people not allowed to enjoy things on multiple levels? Would you prefer that they just completely disregard anything but the cream of the crop? Your thinking seems all fucked up to me.

> this movie is a guilty pleasure of mine

schlock
ʃlɒk/Submit
nounNORTH AMERICANinformal
cheap or inferior goods or material; trash.
"mass-produced schlock"

>if X and Y movies had a baby, this would be it

>A love letter to _____