Is his new Netflix show any good

Is his new Netflix show any good.
All the reviews say it's way too political.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/g-_HKOcYBK8
amazon.com/Genesis-Strategy-Climate-Global-Survival/dp/0306309041/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1473866356&sr=1-2&keywords=genesis strategy
gallup.com/poll/108226/republicans-democrats-differ-creationism.aspx
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolution
ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/eu-position-in-world-trade/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It's bound to be political since conservatives deny climate change and evolution.

No, there is almost no science in it. He explains things as fact, but doesn't back any of it up with facts.

Not, saying any of it is wrong but it won't convert you if you think otherwise and it is too thin on science so it comes off as preaching to the choir. I almost didn't make it through the global warming episode and I know global warming is real.

Good one bro

No is denying climate change. Pwe dispute taking radical action operating on inconclusive data and fear mongering

>Pwe dispute taking radical action operating on inconclusive data and fear mongering
Nice meme

>denies existence and function of DNA
>Bill Nye the """"Science"""" Guy

What I find ironic is the same people who criticize the concept of faith lap up the opinions of "scientists" without ever reading any data and spout what they have been told.

>it comes off as preaching to the choir.
This is pretty accurate. Lots of parts of the show also have a very smug feeling to them that I think kind of hurts its purpose. It's pretty disappointing considering all of the talk that's been going on in the scientific community about which methods for educating the public actually work, and how approaches like this probably do more harm than good. This show isn't going to educate anyone, and it isn't really going to appeal to the audience it wants to. Unless someone already agrees with the premises of the show (at which point, they won't be learning anything), it's probably just going to piss them off.

That being said, it's still Billy Nye. There are enough hints of the old show that it can still be pretty watchable. He could (and probably should) have done a much better job, though.

I love how liberals say "Climate Change" when what they actually mean is "the belief that Climate Change is exactly as important and exaggerated as the media claims despite evidence", and how they say "evolution" when they actually mean "large-scale macro-evoltion that without evidence wants us to believe that humans are exclusively the product of magic primordial soup and monkey incest".

It's obvious why they do that.
Makes it easier to smear your opponents like a cowardly propagandist.

Funny enough Michael Moore called the Trump win months early because of that smug attitude. He said it would be the biggest fuck you in electoral history and he was right. I would be lying if I said shoving it in their faces election didnt feel fantastic

Fact : no climate model is falsifiable, there are hundreds out there which all reach different conclusions, and if you question these unprovable conclusions you are branded a dumb redneck

This man is obviously a pedophile, you just have to take one look at him to know something isn't right. His whole style & demeanor has a creepy "Peter Pan" quality

Honestly this. This is why I get so fed up with the Climate-Cultists.

They don't subscribe to any one single model of Climate Change. And countless models in that field have ALREADY been proven wrong, like the one that said we'd all be under water by 2015.

I love how Lefties where the badge of "SKEPTIC" so proudly, but when that same skepticism is applied to anything they believe in (global warming, "gay genes", white privilege, Bruce Jenner being a woman, etc.). they chimp the fuck out.

>Cucked by Big Oil: The thread

I just feel like there are millions maybe billions of people who literally hate thinking. Like they did just enough to get a job as an Accountant and that's it. They'll spawn some kiddos and smoke some dope and die.

They want to choose 'Faith in Science' because it makes them feel good and smart. It's almost like the Heaven Argument actually lol (i.e. there is a chance Heaven is for Real)

"Well, I know religion is stupid and what scientists are saying might be stupid but I will do the thing that has a CHANCE at being smart"

People just find out that they love to choose probability over thinking and decided to find out all the little probable things in life and then hit autopilot until they die or until some gigantic epiphany hits their minds.

I am not saying religious people aren't like this because they definitely are.

>Anyone who disagrees with me is a shill for an oil company!

Funny how nobody that agrees with you is a shill for countless other companies, huh?

Careful, you might trigger some granola-munching sperg in a Bernie Sanders t-shirt into a yelling fit where he calls you a """useful idiot""".

You can prove man-made global warming by carbon dating the atmosphere with a spectrometer. The results are reproducible, and it does not rely on any models or predictions. The models are simply a result of the research.

>Anyone who disagrees with me is a shill [...]
That's the dogma the right wing has acted under for years.

The real issue is politicization of science. I am willing to concede scientists from the oil industry are suspect but so are people receiving grants and those who profit from it.
All science is polluted by this now and I worry we have allowed politics to subvert research. It may have rendered our science blind

No, thats literally just correlation. You have no idea what scientific "proof" actually means

Conservatives deny that pollution is warming the earth, and believe that humans are descended from Adam and Eve. Make no mistake of that.

>humans are exclusively the product of magic primordial soup and monkey incest
This is more far fetched than the widely believed conservative alternative how exactly?

Holy Jesus fucking Christ this show looks amazing!

Science fuck yeah!

youtu.be/g-_HKOcYBK8

>If you stoop to your enemies' level you win.

Nye over the past 10 years has been a world-class douchebag.


He's not pushing science; he's pushing his atheist social order.
>10 years ago leftists called it global warming
>conservatives called it climate change
>10 years ago: "YOU CONSERVITAARDS ARE STUPPID SOON WE'LL ALL BE FROZEN IN ANOTHER ICE AGE!"
>global warming scientists get debunked

>today
>leftists: 'YOU CONSERVITARDS ARE SOOOO FOOKIN STOOPID FOR DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE!"

Each year, we measure a total of about 29 billion tons of CO2 added to the atmosphere. Where do you think it comes from?
Keep in mind that's more than 100 times what every volcano on earth combined can account for, which is the only natural source of carbon-12.

>b b b but what about

years ago leftists called it global warming
>>conservatives called it climate change
years ago: "YOU CONSERVITAARDS ARE STUPPID SOON WE'LL ALL BE FROZEN IN ANOTHER ICE AGE!"
>>global warming scientists get debunked
>>today
>>leftists: 'YOU CONSERVITARDS ARE SOOOO FOOKIN STOOPID FOR DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE!"

Climate change has been known under that name for over 40 years you dumbo. And both are true, the global average temperature is rising AND climate all over the world is changing.

I like the science shit it has but unfortunately they don't go deep enough with it and it feels rushed and it has some dumb ass segments in it.

>Every episode
>Panel of three people
>Discussion lasts 3 minutes
>Always one that is invited just to be shat on

>Episode 2
>Indian comedy wannabe stand-up man
>LOL WHITE PEOPLE STOP BEING SO STUPID
>HA HA HA *CLAP CLAP CLAP*

The live studio audience was a mistake.

Remember peak oil? How about the hole in the ozone layer? Have these people ever been correct?

Doesn't matter.

The problem is HUMAN overpopulation

As more 3rd-worlders shit out more babies they know they can't afford (and it is their fault as they produce more babies than civilized humans do), resources will deplete, usable land will be taken, species will die with habitat destruction, and pollution will occur.

amazon.com/Genesis-Strategy-Climate-Global-Survival/dp/0306309041/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1473866356&sr=1-2&keywords=genesis strategy

haha remember global cooling

what a big problem that was

just a coincidence that this author is also a major global warming pusher, goy

>it's a creationist retard pretends he understands evolution episode

>he's pushing his atheist social order
Oh no, all those poor kids will grow up not being scared of sky daddy sending them to hell! Nye is a monster!

Nope.

Nice word-gymnastics.

Up until the right called it climate change the left called it global warming.

>How about the hole in the ozone layer?
The ozone layer has been steadily recovering exactly BECAUSE of action to reduce emissions of chlorofluorocarbons you dipshit.

There's no such thing as "macro-evolution," it's a strawman fabricated by creationists and their low IQs to muddy the waters. Or maybe it's the product of genuine stupidity and confusion, you never know with religious types since they really often are that stupid. Macro vs. micro-evolution is like saying you can add 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1, but you can't add 1 + 4. 4 is just a label, they both mean the same thing.

I agree, atheist europe is really going great.

>Up until the right called it climate change the left called it global warming.
Doesn't change the fact that both terms have been used in academia for decades.

Was he ever any good?

The answer is no.

Ice age predictions were never a part or mainstream climatology, and global warming never got debunked.

These days climate change is used interchangeably with anthropogenic global warming, so denialist retards don't get confused.

By any objective metric, is doing way better than most of the world.

Looks like your knowledge of Europe comes from Sup Forums memes and breitbart

If science is "too political", maybe your politics are bullshit.

I'll take things that never happened for 500.

Only very few conservatives deny evolution, meanwhile all leftists deny the existence of race and sexes, which is worse.

It's still called global warming, dumbass

>watching this clowny faggot for even 1 second
I guess if you want to learn 4th grade level science facts

>All the reviews say it's way too political.

>conservatives drop science the second it conflicts with their worldview

You don't say?

YEAH WELL IF WE EVOLVED FROM MONKEYS THEN WHY ARE MONKEYS STILL AROUND TODAY

CHECKMATE LIBTARDS

>Only very few

The majority of republicans are young earth creationists

gallup.com/poll/108226/republicans-democrats-differ-creationism.aspx

Well, that continent won't be atheist for long.

Not an argument. Charles Koch is a good boy.

>I agree, atheist europe is really going great.

Europe isn't atheist by a large majority.

They took over the government/leadership, though.

Forced audience laughter, and cheering is very annoying.

Your way of life is dying a very rapid death, and it's all your fault. Within a generation, you people will be under the thumb of your former pets, the Islamists.

Germany, arguably the most (non-military) powerful country in Europe is lead by the CHRISTIAN democratic union.

Its an undeniable fact the migrants are outbreeding the natives by a wife margin. Where do you think that ends? And the worst part is that the 2nd generation is always more radical in any culture so it is just now kicking off

What the fuck?

Eurotrash literally can't shut up over how incredibly secular they are. It's what I've learned over the past 10 years of Internet use.

>women are poorly represented at the right end of the bell curve
>according to biology, niggers are subhuman, and it's insane to import them
>women are physically weaker than men
>some debilitating conditions are hereditary, and it's a would be reasonable to prevent some people from breeding
This biology lesson triggers the libtards.

Secular doesn't mean atheist, and posters on Sup Forums don't represent Europe.

How are they doing on frequency of terror attacks?

The problem is that there's not really a good definition for what a race is. Unlike for example a species which is a group that can produce fertile offspring.
Trying to draw boundaries between races is quite difficult when you can't really define what a race is. Especially considering that everyone is basically multi-racial to some extent.

And for the sexes problem, you're misrepresenting their argument. They acknowledge that sexes exist. That, like species, has a simple scientific definition. Their challenge is that the way we treat people in terms of gender is cultural, and that people should be allowed to choose which gender they prefer to be treated as.

>by any objective metric
No, "happiness" is not an objective metric, sorry pal. Especially when Europe has about 3x the prescription drug use as anybody else. Your fake happiness =\= quality of life.

Looks like your knowledge comes from HuffPo and Bill Nye.

The editing was terrible honestly. Especially in the interviews. Theyre so edited down that its not a discussion and just feels like weak strawmen.
Also too much focus on bad comedy bits.
Shouldn't have been a live studio audience either.
That tall blonde correspondent was sexy as fuck though.

Also, at least by constitution, many European countries are LESS secular than the US.

If your faith is dead then there is no difference. There is simply no better societal impetus than religion.

>Germany
>most powerful country
>Hanz actually believes this
There's no such thing as "non-military" power, you goofball. Russia has more real power than you.

He never said happiness...

>tfw swede
>tfw after the recent truck-rampage, the niggers were jubilant in the news-coverage
>tfw the americans are right about how fucked we europeans are

>There's no such thing as "macro-evolution,"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolution

>Russian entomologist Yuri Filipchenko first coined the terms "macroevolution" and "microevolution" in 1927 in his German language work, "Variabilität und Variation".

Why are atheists so consistently objectively wrong?

>It's a Dawkinite pretends to have an argument when he doesn't episode

>you don't worship like us so your faith is dead
Sounds like Muhamad talk desu

Of course there is. As the biggest economic power in Europe Germany has imense influence in EU law. There is a difference between economic and military power.

No, that's what the popular argument is. Europe is the most happy, therefore they're are the objectively the best place to live. And since user didn't give any examples of his "objective metrics", I assumed he was using this old argument as his basis. If you have any other "objective metrics", then I would love to see them.

Yes, because if there's one field known for having a Conservative bias, its Television-reviewing.

Hmm. I think you'll enjoy it if you're a 20-something or 30-something who remembers watching him in school and is a fan of the I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE Facebook page and retweets everything Neil deGrasse Tyson says on Twitter.

Otherwise, I don't think you'll get much from it really.

The reviews OP reads? Sure.

>EU law
>relevant
You do realize that all of the other major EU power are dropping out of the EU, leaving Germany as the leader of an army-less and toothless bureaucracy with no power whatsoever, right?

THIS
H
I
S

Obviously it's been coined as a term. Otherwise people wouldn't be using the word dumbass.

His point is that there's no real defined difference between "microevolution" and "macroevolution".

>I have no idea what micro and macro mean with regards to evolution

It shows.

The second episode has a 10 minute rant about how white people are the worst/have no culture

Peak oil is a statistical eventuality when dealing with a finite resource. Even if cars run on farts and childrens laughter, we still use products made from oil in literally every level of society.
We get better at doing more with less, but its still a zero sum game.

>>EU law
>>relevant
As the worlds largest economic zone, yes it is relevant Bucko. Your petty grudge against the EU doesn't change these facts.

>he doubts evolution
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

>Germany tries to take over europe
>Again
Krauts gotta kraut.

The popular argument is that Europe is more successful than America in loads of different metrics. Education, Infant Mortality, Average Lifespan, lots of those sorts of metrics.

But you jumped straight to "happiness" because you didn't know that.

"Macroevolution" is just lots of microevolutions. You apparently think souls and magic are real though so I won't waste my time explaining even simple concepts to someone dumber than pets I've owned.

Not surprising in the least bit. I guess that's the left's way of getting non-whites interested in science.

>worlds largest economic zone
Lol wut?

I think it was more about stop doing stupid shit because some slant eye or swami says its better than modern medical science. And half of that rant boiled down to telling turban heads and chinks to stop pretending their bullshit ancient culture trumps modern advancements.

>posting pedophilia
you have jewish genetics

Look it up, friend ;)

ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/eu-position-in-world-trade/

This is also how I feel about it.

Jews tell us on TV that Christianity is mainstream. It really hasn't been since the great wars. But from the Jewish perspective everyone is christian as opposed to like them Jews.

Normies watch TV that Jews run and are told Christianity is mainstream. Jews aren't christian so they promote non-christian ideas on their shows.

They ahve Sam Harris and Bill Maher on to say edgey things. Normies see this and in an effort to be individual snowflakes and fight the man they think Atheism is a little badge they can wear that tells everyone else they are special and smart at the same time.

However, anyone who has read philosophy in the past 150 years knows scientific positivism and verificationism are meme ideologious and require just as much faith as Christianity anyway.

The reason lefties love atheismi and buddhism is simly because its a way to make them selves seem cool and smart.

The best part is buddhists who smoke weed which just means they didnt even read intro buddhists texts the prohibit substances.

Religion is just beliefs of hte world that affect the way you live in it. Atheists have beliefs about the world, they even believe in evangelising it (ironically enough, see bill nye's show as an example), they have an eschatology in Global Warming, they think the world will turn into an inferno if we dont use the right light bulbs and by the right cars. Other than that they 'try to be good people' but that doesnt mean anything as I've never met an atheist who was critical of any bodies actions including, cheating, promiscuity, substance abuse. As long as you dont kill somoene or tell someone that they shouldnt do something you are a saint in that religion.

The other true sign its a religion is that normies take it really seriously without even understanding it at its fundamental level. Normies in the victorian era and earler never learned or understood what Christianity was all about.

And what is Germany going to do if the U.K. pulls out? Oh right, nothing. How about France? Do they have an army that will enforce any of thier arbitrary laws? Or will they continue to just say "fuck white males, tis volkish".

I'm not really sure what your point is? EU law is enforced by EU member states if that's what you're asking.

better start packing your bags pablo