Women's right to vote

Should women have the right to vote? I find myself wanting to answer "no" to the question for many reasons.
>women are more emotional than logical
>they have no sense of pride (national or otherwise)
>they will do whatever it takes to have peace, even if it means getting run over
>most importantly, they are not directly involved or affected by politics the way men are. Men HAVE to work. Men HAVE to go to war. Etc.

However, in order to allow for a true democracy all citizens must be able to vote. How can it be a real democracy with more than half the population not being allowed to vote?

Can you guys help me answer this question?

>implying that understanding fundamental differences between men and women makes me gay

wew lad

wet hole spotted

no one takes you seriously, cunt.

Bump

>tfw no Amazon Waifu

Giving women the right to vote was a huge mistake which might lead to the destruction of our civilization.

You are amongst friends here
Is the image what the states would look like if only white men voted?

>Everything that isn't democracy is bad

Your first mistake was believing in democracy.

Yes. Here is all men across the board. Women are cancerous on a society.

>Is the image what the states would look like if only white men voted?

Yes. Though I was being a bit misleading. Attached is how the 2012 election would have looked if only white men and women voted.

Women are less likely to vote, or even be interested in politics. There are some women that are actually intelligent and not slaves to their emotions, just as there are hundreds of thousands of cuck men out there that listen entirely to emotion like a woman. A woman can't help being a woman, that is something they are stuck with contrary to what trannies would have you believe.

The reason it's bad to have all of these emotional people voting is because of the media's monopoly of power. Call a guy racist every day and those people will believe it in less than a week; call a criminal a good person and those people might even believe that with enough time. The media's reach is extending too far, I don't know what the answer is to that but something needs to happen.

Women are far more susceptible to emotions and media/pop culture influence compared to men.

No one should. It should be earned through service

lol that pic's ridiculous.

I know many older traditional woman who are patriotic, have pride in their country and are cynical enough.Still not enough to see through media bullshit, still emotion-driven.Just adopting another pattern of behaving, nothing more.SAD

Democracy is garbage in general, it isn't women it is the masses, they shouldn't be allowed to have any fucking say in economic or foreign policy they know fucking nothing about anything.
Not that they do get a say anyway, its clearly a charade

>real democracy
No one has a real democracy. Real democracies are shit.
>Should women be allowed to vote?
What should allow someone to vote? In my opinion, if you don't generate tax revenue, are not eligible for conscription, or can't pass a literacy test given by a neutral institution you shouldn't be able to vote in a national election.
>Muh feels
Those are going to be hard to define. Also, it must suck to be that guy.

Reminds me of me. Execpt she's more jacked

>neutral institution

This is where it gets sketchy. Things never stay neutral for long.

Very true, but I also imagine that having a purposely difficult literacy test would be a boon to this system.

Post tits.

Suffrage was a mistake

Yeah. Well the best thing we got now is our constitutional republic. The constitution is a pain in the neck for these politicians.

Everything they touch will be destroyed... but I guess I have my guns and freedom of speech. Of course freedom of speech is essentially being eliminated through social methods, only way to escape that is if you have millions of dollars or are a hermit in the woods and nobody can ruin your life and career.

we need to end irrational femininity

STOP WITH THIS DEMOCRACY SHIT YOU FUCKING NIGGER

I find the lack of awareness of why the constitution protects rights concerning when talking to most liberals.

>I think people should be stripped of their rights without due process because they're on a watchlist
>I think the executive branch should be able to pass legislation without congressional approval because the opposing party is blocking it
>I think the government should be able to silence hate speech, or restrict gun rights with no solid definitions on either of them

It's terrifying. Usually to get it across that they're asking for a totalitarian police state, I have to reverse it a lot.

>So, let's say Trump gets elected, and he passes a law without approval banning Islamic worship in the United States, prevents Muslims from preaching, and disarms Muslims without due process with the same process as above.
>Even better, let's say congress does pass it, and the majority of people do think this is justifiable. What then?

I think it's ok on a local level. It's really dumb at a national level though. Inhertance is probably the best way to avoid corruption at that scale.

A confederation of state republics with a severely limited federal monarchy protection continental interests would be pretty tight, i think.

>However, in order to allow for a true democracy all citizens must be able to vote.

so a true democracy requires children to vote?

essentially, realizing that the mind of a woman differs not very much from the mind of a child is the key to your dilemma.

no matter your view, either you have to let children vote or you have to undo womens suffrage.

The truth of the matter is, yes. The world would be a better place if women couldn't vote. Or, at least the developed western world, but there's no going back at this point. It would have to kill feminism completely gradually, and instill the factual data on the genders, then try to reason with them. All this on a collective scale, good luck.

>wanting democracy
There's your problem mate.

But hipotetically speaking, if democracy was just anavoidable and set to stay, I'd give up my right to vote gladly. I really don't put that much value on MUH POLITICAL VOICE anyway, if the price for the same thing would be what we're experiencing now. I mostly trust men in case of politics since they've shown to be much more reasonable when choosing for what and who they vote for, and just taking a glance through history I come to know that all great civilizations were created by men and men alone.

Though as I said, (((democracy))).
I'd prefer either a national socialist state or a monarchy much more.

Democracy is shit and it doesn't work.

are there any stats on what percentage of women vote solely on "muh vagina" issues like birth control and "wage gap" shit?

Women above aged 30s/40s+ are quite fine. It's just that most of my fellow young women are pretty retarded when it comes to logical thinking, and this is coming from a young woman myself.

Here's what I think the voting rules should be..

Armed forces get 4 votes

All Pensioners (60+) get 3 votes

All Males (21+) get 2 votes

All Females (30-39) get 1 vote

All Females (40+) get 2 votes

What do you think? An idea I came up with a few days ago.

It's way too late to ask this question. They should have never gotten the right to vote, but once you grant a group of people certain rights (or equal rights) then there is pretty much no turning back. If you make this mistake, you have fucked up and can not recover from it. This is the future we chose, whether we like it or not. We will have to live with the consequences, even if it means we only get to watch as everything turns to shit.

Pretty good but I think males should get 2 votes at 18 and not 21.

Why even have that convoluted? If the reason older women get more privilege is because they vote like males what is the utility in letting them vote at all?

Should probably just be land owning males 25+, like in America post revolution and Europe post-monarchies. That was the only time voting produced bold, prudent results.

I dunno, Hans. Things in history seem inevitable until they aren't anymore. If you get what I'm saying.

Kek that's all nice and sweet but how exactly do you think they'd ever accept something as muhsoggyknees as that? And it still wouldn't change the fact that a growing proportion of millenials, be they male or female (though predominantly female as we know) are becoming hardcore marxists. One that we'd have them grown into pensioners and they'd still hold their previous beliefs, it really wouldn't change that much in my opinion. All people, no matter the gender, are accepting this marxist dogma and spiraling into degeneracy, and something must be done forcibly to stop this from furthering any further.

Abolish democracy. Instill fascism. Problem solved.

One day we'd*

Oh c'mon Hans, I've expected better from you, don't you still have some of it in your blood? Or is it just that that kikewhore Merkela is watching over you 24/7?

F A S C I S M I S T H E W A Y .