Ladies and Gentlemen...

Ladies and Gentlemen... the """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""English""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" premier league

If you want to see countries represented watch the boring drivel that is international football. The last thing I want to see is England's 19th XI playing England's 20th XI. I don't even like their first.

if man city wins can we just end the prem early this year

>Best EPL teams only have 2 english players at most
What could it mean?

are brave Drinkeh

Two english players too many on the field desu

Shit people, shit players

Caminante and bebedor de agua

>didn't see the brave Lewis Dunk and Glenn Murray takedown arsenal
We're doing fine lad, worry about yourself

>English Premier League
>includes Welsh teams
hmmmmmmmmm

Welsh team. Cardiff was relegated to Championship last season

Why are Spanish footballer so good?

Based Aryans Gundogan, Sane and Rüdiger dominating Anglos

They only have 2 options to escape from the poverty:
Become youtuber or become a profressional football player

It's not called the english premier league though

De Bruyne is half English

>every great player in the world wants to play for the biggest league in the world which causes the top teams that everyone aspires to to have varied nationalities in their squads. More news at 11.

explain Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Juve actually having players from their respective countries

Barca only start with 3 Spanish players

Madrid usually start with 2 Spanish players

Germany is irrelevant

peak barca had 6-8 spanish players starting

madrid has always been a mercenary club, I'll give you that

relevanter than you, mohammed

>Madrid usually start with 2 Spanish players
Madrid starting eleven hasn't happened in more than 5 or 6 matches this season due to injuries. Ramos, Carvajal, Nacho (he's been the player with the most minutes this season), Isco, Lucas & Asensio have played a lot

Also Barca routinely starts Alba, Piqué, Roberto, Busquets, Iniesta.

so where is Rhyl and Cefn Druids?

Stones and Sterling are usually starters. Fuck Kompany and Bernardo

I don't care. If English players are good enough, they'll break through.

The only Spanish first team players at Real Madrid are Ramos, Carvajal and Isco.

>Stones and Sterling over Kompany and Bernardo

Sterling is better than poonardo to be fair and is just injured

Sterling is just a tap in babby but Stones in unironically GOAT.

It's not the English premier league you melt its the BPL

BARCLAYS premier league

It only has teams from places in which Barclays has branches.

Gee, it's almost like if the English aren't good at football or something

kall waka

Barclay's don't sponsor it

Fun fact: Harry Kane (2016 & 2017) was the first english player to be Top Scorer of the EPL since Kevin Phillips was in 1999-00.

Kane is Irish

>le pacey black player is better than bernardo
this isn't fifa child

Why didn't Bernardo play for Portugal in 2016

he got injured at he last moment of the season

sterling isn't actually that pacey. he's pretty explosive, but his flat speed isn't impressive.

Sterling has been far better though and won city so many points when it was important

Based Jews destroying Europe

How does City even manage to register players for the CL? None of those are homegrown in the nation, yet alone the club.

This is why the English are literally cucks.
>being proud of JohnnyForeigner Premier league
LMAO pathetic

this.

Yeah but technically he's not as good as Bernardo. He's just all about the goals, which might be what the team needs anyway.

Your league is all German and shit because of it.

What went wrong lads

...

>Your league is all German and shit because of it.
This is what makes out NT great though.
>Britshits will never see their team lift the world cup
Been there twice already, I'd feel bad for you cucks if you didn't ruin football forever by bending over to foreign money.

>This is what makes out NT great though.
[citation needed]

I never understood that claim. How does lowering your league's standard by preferring home-grown players benefit the national team?
Are you saying that the English national team sucks because their player's aren't good enough to be featured in their league's top clubs? How would the English national team benefit from mediocre players playing for Man City? It's not like some foreign player is stealing an English player's spot and talent.

From my understanding, the German national team is so good because Germany invests a lot in their infrastructure and because a lot of children play football.

>This is what makes out NT great though
Maybe. Our youngsters should still be able to get game time at some club though. Then they can improve and join our top clubs, which should give us enough good players to put together a good national side.

Our youngsters actually get a chance to play, unlike English youngsters who mostly rot on the bench or are forced to play for the U23 team. What's so hard to understand about that?
English youngsters never really get a legitimate chance. EPL clubs just buy a slightly better Johnny Foreigner, instead of giving their homegrown talents the time to develop.

Also, British clubs have a shitload more money than German clubs...I seriously doubt their "infrastructure" is worse than ours...maybe their coaching is just shit, though....I can't name a single world class English manager for instance...no idea why that is tßh.

>English youngsters never really get a legitimate chance. EPL clubs just buy a slightly better Johnny Foreigner, instead of giving their homegrown talents the time to develop.
Any youngster who is good enough will get a chance. Even if there were no foreign players, clubs could still rely on experience and not give the youngsters a look in.

The problem is the level is too high so the youngsters should go to another league. They can get experience somewhere else and come back a better player. Things like quotas don't help though and force clubs to stockpile English youth instead of letting them get first team experience.

You guys have u23 teams playing in the lower leagues too which probably allows clubs to be more confident about putting youngsters into a first team.

If an English player had the quality, he would start for City, United or Chelsea. The thing is, they don't, so they play and start for other mid-table teams. Are you saying that the English players in the top teams that are subs are the best English players out there? Even further, do you think that those players are better than other English players that are starters for mid-table clubs?

Bottom line: it's ridiculous to claim that English players don't get a chance to play.

English players don't have the quality because their not given the time to develop playing top tier football. Otherwise there has to be something inherently wrong with them, which I doubt.
>Are you saying that the English players in the top teams that are subs are the best English players out there?
Yes
>Even further, do you think that those players are better than other English players that are starters for mid-table clubs?
Yes to that, as well, otherwise they wouldn't have been signed by the likes of City/ManU/Chelsea etc.
They have the most money and reputation, obviously they will try to buy up all the talent...in the long run they don't really care if these talents make it or not, as long as their competiiton doesn't profit off them. If you're a starter at a midtable EPL club and put in solid performances one of the top 5 WILL buy you eventually. Bayern Munich does the same all the time, but at least they make sure those talents get regular 1st division football by loaning them out at once.
Why don't more top 5 clubs loan out their players to Ligue1/Bundes/Liga Nos hell even Eredivisie then? Are they just not good enough, or do they not want to leave the British isles for whatever reason? At least they'd get some regular football abroad.

>Yes to that, as well, otherwise they wouldn't have been signed by the likes of City/ManU/Chelsea etc.
Pretty sure they've only signed them to meet the home-grown player quotas for the CL.

Pep has actually made the team more English
>Walker
>Delph
>Sterling
>Stones
>Foden

...

>Why don't more top 5 clubs loan out their players to Ligue1/Bundes/Liga Nos hell even Eredivisie then? Are they just not good enough, or do they not want to leave the British isles for whatever reason? At least they'd get some regular football abroad.
Maybe they're not good enough. But they did win a few international tournaments in the summer so it could be turning around.

Correct. I'd rather the England NT dissolve than impose any (further) player limits in the PL.

If it wasn't for the quota most EPL teams would be 99% Johnny Foreigner.
I honestly don't know how to fix this, it's a vicious circle, really.

Btw, does anyone think youth football in England is going to be fucked real soon? We won those tournaments in the summer but all those youth players might disappear soon. The Elite Player Performance Plan means that big clubs can get youth players for basically nothing now. This was fine when EPPP because big clubs got all those young players and the young players got a higher level of youth football but now the smaller clubs are closing their academies because it's not worth it anymore and all that talent is going to dry up.

Get rid of all the player limits.

>This was fine when EPPP
should be
>This was fine when EPPP first came in

What's their end game here?
Seems short sighted as hell...and a stupid economic decision to boot...because in the long run it's much cheaper to develop your own talent...but maybe they just don't care anymore, seeing how much money they make with TV rights...English football is literally on its deathbed.

Maybe we should get rid of the quota. It gives English players a premium and stops them from being sold abroad.

Also, maybe pan-European competition at a youth level would showcase English quality and make foreign clubs more willing to buy.

>3-6-1

The end game was that all the elite youth players went to the top team so that the competition level would be better and our youngsters would raise their game. But economically, like you said, it's stupid, and academies and literally closing because of it.

>pan-European competition at a youth level
This already exists, there is the U19 Championsleague/Euro league, apart from all the regular youth tournaments in which English teams participate quite frequently.
Chelsea won the Uefa youth league back to back just a couple of years ago, but I think most of the players have disappeard into oblivion by now.

Those are our only 2 options as well but we're still not as good so it must be something else

Delph, Sterling and Foden were already there m8. Pretty sure Pep wanted to bin Delph too but he chose to stuck around and fight for his place.

Stones is looking like he's gonna feature less and less. He's been shit since his injury and Laporte/Otamendi partnership seems to be working fine.

>Naming your league after some soulless investment banking money magic merchants
>Actually determine the league's eligible teams in accordance with said bankers' wishes

Holy shit Brits are worse finance servants than Burgers.

>3 of those cost £50m

They could make it at u21 level as well. Also, make it so youth teams don't qualify from their parents being in the CL proper but off their own merits.

Still probably wouldn't make a difference.

Are you mentally ill? No one even mentioned the Jews.