Political Spectrum

Post yours Sup Forums

filteries.com/politics

> Progressive Capitalism

I consider myself a Right Wing progressive. Some rights for fags, eugenics encouraged, extreme Nationalism, some libertarian elements in the context of a closed-border, militarized state.

Not bad my Friend. Real American!

Democracy doesn't work imho. On monarch with the power to police the borders. Citizenry highly armed in case they need to kill him. More of a free-for-all in the economic sector. Taxes mainly on consumption only, which discourages degenerate consumerism and encourages rich people to invest their money in businesses that improve the country. This investment compensates for our lack of cheap, outsourced labor and products. Everyone gainfully employed, minimal welfare outside of a minimum wage at age 25.

Your two-party democracy scares me. Any amount of non-violent democratic process means a slow slide towards leftism as the lower class votes for more welfare year after year

...

Seems to be somewhere between a Nationalist and a right-wing Libertarian.

...

>Pro Free Market
>Pro Low Taxes
>Nationalist
>Environmentalist
>Pro Gay Rights
>Anti Abortion
>Pro Democracy but with Suffrage Limited
What the fuck am I Sup Forums?

Not bad. Im thinking i should have changed mine to direct democracy though. But i firmly believe that society can exist without individuals but individuals can't exist without society

I think they improved this a lot since the last time I tried it out, it's much more creative than anything else that supposedly judges your political foundations

Capital gains is a bs sector and should be taxed to discourage speculative practices.
Reasonable taxes necessary to provide a relatively high level of development combined with a very strict policy on who can be part of the club in order to keep the costs managable and the parasites out.
High levels of personal freedom because I dont give a fuck who you marry.
No religion because that shit sucks.
Plenty of military spending to keep the niggers out and plenty of scientific spending to develop the economy and wellbeing of the people.
Strict environmental laws because not even dogs shit where they sleep.

The free speech one is cool. I say you can slander people. After all isn't it legal here? Truth is a defence to these kinds of things

You're a nationalist libertarian. Says so right on the automatic label generator. Dont you trust in the judgment of random internet questionnaires to inform you of your political positions?

the freespeech option: White is no law and grey is with law or the opposite ?

Greyed in means there is a law limiting free speech.

fok

I'm just disgusted by media sensationalism. People eat up whatever they read for the sake of gossip and dont bother for the truth, I think when the media jeopardizes someones reputation for their own profit they should be held accountable for that. During election seasons like these it might also help curtail the amount of useless shitflinging by biased media sources against candidates they dislike. The influence of the media on public perception is enormous, they have to be held accountable in my view

>Obscenity
What actually is obscenity? It seems to be one of those words that changes based upon culture.

was expecting something different, tbqh

...

Now this is a new one. Thank you user.

I unno. I havr religious laws and full faggot rights. So there's that. Also nobody can see my other tax rates and the free speech thing. I had religious and violence enabled and taxes were 21 capital 12 sales 30 corp and 25 income

...

Fascist master race here

Canada obsessed on "community standards". But also think of Japan and nudity or sex and pixelation. It's a garden path really. But it kind of makes sense to say "if the average person views this does it disgust them" if you're going to rationalise banning these

How does one buy a home in your country? Landed Gentry?

What's the difference between decriminalizing and making something legal?

Soft drugs decriminalized
vs
Soft drugs legal

Prostitution illegal but decriminalized
vs
Prostitution legal, brothels illegal

Decrim is a fine. Legal is weedman. Similar to how parking or traffic tickets don't tend to give you a record

And full education and moderate pensions. Minority and women's rights are nothing too extreme

Sup Forums is full of fucking hippies it seems

> I've just had my first pubic hair: the post.

I admit I don't fully understand the percentages on taxings, so I left them neutral.

amidoinitrite?

would pol like to live in my country ?

It makes it fairly easy for you, a balanced budget at 50 percent is optimal. You have to decide where it comes from though and how much you're spending

Wait, how do you use the free speech tab? When the buttons are bright, does it mean that it's legal or illegal? Am I turning on a ban or turning on a right? I can't tell.

And the social justice crowd insists I'm a Nazi.

How far left has the pendulum swung that someone like me can be slandered as a fascist for simply wanting the freedom to mock whoever I want and to not have affirmative action?

grey you have laws, bright you dont

Dark means illegal.

You can extol one right wing view in this cuckland and be called a Nazi.

The people in this country are fucking cucks.

>Nationalist Progressive Capitalism

Sounds nice.

Best representation of AnCap I can do

...

Geez, really? I had it the opposite of how I want it, then.

I have another question: Isn't the USA a multi-party system? We have tons of parties. It's just that two parties dominate. This isn't enforced by the law. It's just the way that it naturally came to be. It's something that has changed frequently over the course of our history. Yet the default setting is a two-party system and the tool tip says that the US is a two-party system.

here's mine r8 me m80

prob counts as multiparty

its cause you factually have a two party system

Also does this chart weight economic freedom higher than personal freedom or something (which is a right-wing thing)? Somehow my individualism score is low and I'm a 'collectivist' even though I have a 83% personal freedom rating and a 52% economic freedom rating.

Centre-right mustard race

We really don't. There isn't any text in our foundational documents about political parties. At one point in our history we had one party, at another we had four. Washington said that there should be no parties.

the less taxation u got the more ure an individual country

...

r8

it's garbage, isn't it?

factual because in over 100 years only republicans and democrats had practial relevance

statist scum

WTF? How do you even get a "modern" and "individualist" score then, unless you insist (against reality) you can have social welfare without raising taxes? Also how does that somehow outweigh not having a crap ton of laws telling you what to do?

If you ain't red, you ain't cool.

ahh I see... here's my updated.

r8

That doesn't make sense. There isn't any law enforcing such a thing and the country currently has multiple parties. You're incorrect if you call us a two-party country.

Edgy anarchist, good luck browsing the chans from your makeshift mudhut. Hope the raiders don't ransack you again.

your budget balance is only 37%, that means you spend more than you make

>nationalist centrism

I'm a fascist, what the fuck.

If there were an option to ethnically cleanse I'd ban abortion outright.

Another question: What does "illegal but decriminalized if selling" mean in regards to prostitution? What's "selling"?

nice budget balance, Barack

dude the fact that you dont have a law regulating the two party thing makes it a "factual" two party system. Because in fact politics were all the same if the other parties didnt exist. If it was enforced by law it was a formal two party system (which indeed it isnt)

...

Expansonist, Immigr restricted, everything completely forbidden but guns?

...

>Society cannot function peacefully without violent coercion

Retarded faggots.

...

Hmm... What about this?

Come at me, conservatives.

But it isn't a two party system. We have more than two parties.

Delusional Faggot.

...

Excellent argument my friend

am i on the wrong board?

What do you guys have to say

Nah, you are one speaking.

not too bad

stop being a statist

>Capital Gains Tax: 23%

Just no.

Looking at your flag doesnt surprise me

Hello Saudi Arabia.

...

Picking between globalism, federalism, and hegemonism was really hard. I want a federal government that uses hegemony in the interests of establishing a one-world government.

ayn rand still lives!

pls no bully

Would be heaven~

>All those free speech laws.

Wew senpai.

Kill yourself
Sweden is not a national socialist country, now go out and play in the mud you scrub

...

Progressive Centrism

Total State Influence: 37%
Traditional Values: 6%
Budget Balance: 50%
Personal Freedom: 67%
Economic Freedom: 59%

...

Wait, how do you have a 95% individualism score with no free speech? Does it actually mean that there aren't laws when the button is dark? So confusing.

>Capital Gains Tax: 40%

you cuck