>exist for 1000 years >produce no notable technological or scientific advancements >produce no notable works of literature >your architecture is greek fanfic >get destroyed by a bunch of jews and starving barbarian tribes
Am I getting it right? Was Roman empire just a huge meme?
He copy pasted it from some Sup Forums bait thread posted by a russian faggot some days ago
Cooper Adams
>be canadian
Blake Ross
>1000 years
stupid beaner
Zachary King
>virgil, ovid, horace
Nathan Jones
>produce no notable technological or scientific advancements weak bait >produce no notable works of literature even weaker bait >your architecture is greek fanfic greeks literally were romans, iberians were too >get destroyed by a bunch of jews and starving barbarian tribes this is partly true, but only after germanics backstabbed them
Ethan Perry
they had aqueducts and rule of law
things your corrupt shithole doesn't even have in 2016
Jacob Jackson
Mexican "intellectuals", everybody.
Ethan Powell
>>produce no notable technological or scientific advancements Taking the military tech, yes, you are right
>>produce no notable works of literature
virgil, for starters. They were also notable in political science, iirc, and law
>>your architecture is greek fanfic
true to an extent. They were good enginners
>Was Roman empire just a huge meme?
Nope
Jaxson Lewis
to be fair there is some truth to this
if you think america is strong today, you won't believe the kind of power rome had by comparison.
its literally unbelievable that such an empire could fall.
Dylan Lee
Kek
William Smith
Aqueducts Highways A Fucking Republic Oh my God, get your fucking wallet out
The Romans were engineers to the Greeks scientists
Mason Morgan
We know 1/10th at best of what the ancient world produced. Whats the first to go when your one Irish monk with 250 scrolls to reproduce since they're rotting, a history of the emperors or the philosophies of a forgotten prophets.
Carter Rogers
The best character of the games.
Michael James
>>produce no notable technological or scientific advancements >>produce no notable works of literature
The first one is arguable, but the second one is literally stupid
Connor Ross
Thank you Austria.
Isaiah Scott
Compared to Ancient Greek their literature really was shit. The Roman 'greats' are based in ancient greece anyway, like the Aenid and Metamorphoses
Asher Garcia
they did quite a bit in the ways of infrastructure, but I don't know much beyond that in terms of technology.