Globalism

So, Sup Forums. What actually is wrong with globalism

...

Everything

Globalists want a one World Government and guess which group of people will be at the top of the pyramid

Internationalism NOT Globalism

Niggers and Africans are to be treated as equals.

1984 government without escape

Having a homogenous country is preferred

It benefits the few

No whites

Come on you fucks - so far everything sounds like hot air? Did you just watch a couple of Molyneux videos and just accept """globalism""" is bad?

Can you tell me why isolationism/protectnism is good, with actual cited evidence?

Or is that too much for you? Can't rely on youtube videos for everything.

RULE BRITANIA, BRITANIA RULES THE WAVES.

Multiculturalism does not work in practice.

It's good for struggling countries
There's also a difference between social and economic isolation

so feelings is what is wrong with globalism?

tits & timestamp or gtfo

Why and how? Where is your evidence? How does this tie in to this idea of """globalism"""?

And do you see what I mean by "hot air"?

Globalists don't understand that the human population cannot survive at it's current numbers of everyone lives at the same standard as wealthy Western countries.

The western lifestyle is so wasteful and consumes so many resources that the planet would be destroyed if everyone lived to that standard.

Niggers and Muslims exist.

Feelings are what is wrong about globalism because the reason people want globalism in the first place came from muh feelings. My beliefs did not come from muh feelings, but came from muh freedom in accordance with muh feelings.
Naturally right versus artificially right.
I am a weapon of Mother Nature and I do not exist for myself. I exist for all and one so that what is natural may exist.

I was a big support of globalization for the last 15 or so years. The idea is rooted in Ricardo's work on comparative/absolute advantage.

The idea is pretty solid. North Americans are smart, so we should leave the shitty assembly line work to the Mexicans/Chinese/Vietnamese so that we can focus on productive work like inventing things like uber.

What I think most people are realizing now is that while it my have certain advantages, the service economy was already saturated with low skilled workers, so the blue collar workers of America got the shaft, particularly blacks and Latinos.

economic productivity falls into the big sectors, the extractive ( gold and lumber and oil), manufacturing and service.

Between the outsourcing of labour to poor countries to make things cheaper for the people that still have jobs, and the exponential pace of automation, the idea that a county could survive without some kind of protected manufacturing sector is absurd.

Rolling back nafta, and undoing tpp is not necessarily the answer either, but something need to be done to revitalize opportunities for low education workers

RULE BRITANNIA, BRITANNIA RULES THE WAVES!

Now we are getting somewhere with actual informed responses.

Thank you.

Ultimately it creates a society entirely without diversity on an incredibly large scale. By "diversity" I don't mean forced shit like affirmative action, but real, actual diversity in the form of differences between cultures, tastes, ideals etc.

If everyone ends up the same (thinks the same way, believes in the same things), everyone can be controlled and manipulated more easily.

It creates a basically communist society where people CAN'T have more than others or the entire system would fail, thus killing a lot of incentive to do well with your life and learn things (you'll be told what to learn and what to do with your life as will everyone else).

It would require control over the people taken to extremes, media manipulation wouldn't even be a thing anymore as things like that would be directly controlled by those in power in order to continue brainwashing the people. Aside from that there may also be some 1984-tier shit to prevent any sort of dissent (which, if it spread, would be disastrous for globalism).

It's one extreme of what human society could turn out to be. The other end of the spectrum could be a world with no unity at all, where people live in some sort of autonomous commune-like structure and don't interact with outsiders for things other than trade or knowledge sharing. I would greatly prefer something like that to globalism, which quite frankly seems very depressing.

It has its pros and cons just like everything else.

Technology is driving globalism.

We should be embracing it and trying to understand how to make it work for everyone/use it to our advantage, because there is no 'stopping' globalism, only slowing it down.

>thinking it's okay to not hold everyone up to the same standard and act as if consciousness cannot be achieved by all, so we are all the same, with physical and mental exceptions
>actually believing in artificial segregation
I can tell you are insecure already friend

What you're referring to as globalism is probably the proper definition which just means free trade and movement of capital and labor.

This would be fine... If that's what advocates of globalism were actually after. If you have a free society you already have a globalist society. The problem is the welfare state.

Not all men are created equal and when you have a system that forces productive members of society to prop up the dregs of society everyone ends up poorer and worse off.

What "golablists" advocate for is basically a system where the global elite control the vast majority of the world's wealth and resources and the rest of us are serfs.

They will cut off any avenues of building wealth and private ownership through usury. Everyone will be forced to become so indebted to provide for themselves that they cannot save enough to ever get out of it. Most people will be glorified indentured servants completely dependent on the landlords and the State.

That is one fat pussy
Is that natural?

>what a whore, parading that fat cooch around

Sociopaths and idiots are in charge and doing it wrong.

It is two-way road.
While big biz enjoy new markets, common people enjoy imported labor, religious fanatics etc.

Too bad public brainwashed into not understanding simple things.

To assume power, assumes corruption. Someone who holds the right amount of power, would say the invalue in his power and denounce it, finding out he still has hold on it.
Globalists would find themselves in a slippery slope type of scenario where they will either need to break more of their ethics to continue their reign or stop and stagnate, which will cause problems in the public, because people have freewill. We exist with free-will without thinking. I think therefore I am is not true, because you exist, make choice, and act while at a low state of consciousness. I, and others, can attest to this. People will be harmed by the globalist agenda because it steps on their freedom. This will cause them to act, without thought, against the globalists, therefore you will need to control these people. This will always go on, you controlling more and more people, freedom becoming less and less and for why? So we could have freedom in the first place?

The greater good does not exist.
You can only do good things. You do not kill to save a thousand until you understand why you would kill the one. The one's life is in your hand only. You must see the responsibility for the freedom of value.
That's actual consciousness. That's real. To turn away from the freedom of choice, to remove choice, inherently was unnatural and wrong.

Because people don't want to throw away their ideologies. Mainly sandniggers. They always want to assimilate everybody around them into their way of living.

niggers

>What actually is wrong with globalism
Natural globalism is fine. Forced globalism is not.

>1 post by this ID

>Where is your evidence
yugoslavia
brazil
all multicultural countries ever are shit

>yugoslavia
>multicultural
????

Kek

No nationalism

Its about creating a mass mobile unskilled labor force that will destroy labor unions.

>a system where the global elite control the vast majority of the world's wealth and resources and the rest of us are serfs.
So why are commiefags supporting them?

it always depends on context. When you're economically worth much more and resources lie somewhere else, it benefits you. If you're economically weak and have the resources, you're getting ripped off.
On an equal playing field, if the average wealth is poor in the world, your standard of living will be dragged down.

it had many different religions and people, how is that not multicultural?

Globalism promotes international terrorism.

It's diversity without diversity. Also overexposure to a lot fo things from all over the world can be harmful to the human mind. You can't be everywhere to experience everything. Long-distance globalism like Sup Forums is OK though. We don't go in each others lebens-space.

Yep. Never ending cycle of negativity.

the world will basically be americanized so our native cultures will be more and more replaced by degenerate american "culture"

there's literally no difference between croats and serbs, they only like to bash each other

(((Globalists))) care about the goyi- I mean the common people. We should trust (((them))).

They used this world with other meaning it used to promote fusion.

Underrated post

>what is wrong with it?
If you happen to be the owner of a multinational theres nothing wrong
but you're probably the remaining 99.999% of those who get fucked by it