Why are all scenes in this movie so fucking long?

why are all scenes in this movie so fucking long?

Other urls found in this thread:

archiviokubrick.it/opere/film/2001/script/2001-originalscript.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=LCG2nuM3RFw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

because it's pretentious garbage

because the script was 5 pages long. literally nothing happens

Remake when? I would love to see what Spielberg would do with this.

You sound like you like your flicks fast and maybe furious.

when you watch it in 2.5x its bearable

The script is actually quite long and exceptionally comprehensive archiviokubrick.it/opere/film/2001/script/2001-originalscript.pdf

jesus christ this is a terrible board

Because its not a vine, you proll

to piss off normies and give people on drugs some fun

To weed out brainlets

Does this thread get posted everyday because of autism or is it a bot?

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

pleb filter

>not Micheal Bay

please stop this

Before 70´s movies used to have long scenes.
With the arrival of french cinema, american filmakers evolve in what will be the quick montage of 70´s and 80´s

its symbolism for how long kubricks dick was

Why don't plebs understand the value of filmmaking? Story is the only thing they get because it's explained to them directly and it requires next to no brainpower.

youtube.com/watch?v=LCG2nuM3RFw

Because it's a movie about space, and it tries to catch how the emptiness it transmits.

Inaccurate. Most new wave cinematographers actually preferred the long take shot because they believed it to be the less adulterated kind of shot, the one less manipulated by montage and thus the more realistic one.

You are correct on the fact that the quick montage appears on the 80's though, but it's not as a consequence of the new wave, well it is, but not directly.

The new wave also defends the author theory, in short, that the audiovisual constructs are subjective. America incorporates this but still maintain a classical pacing and invisible montage on commercial films... only experimental films and the new video clips dare use a fast paced montage at the 80s.

It is in the 90s with the action movies that the fast pacing montage starts to hit commercial cinema.

because they watch everythong on tiny screens, with lots of distractions and focus only on the things that grab their attention the most and overlook everything else.

but to be fair there are just too many damn movies

Silly little kid. You'll never get it.

It was a great film IN IT'S TIME.

It really boils down to the fact that actual space travel was new in the 1960s, and people were awed by both the concept, as well as the journey itself.

This film was released in a time where people actually had a genuine sense of wonder, and a genuine hope for the future of mankind. The general population was more intelligent then; more educated, more cohesive, and more caring.

The rise of the jewish-led counter-culture, and the riots of 1968 and beyond ruined all of that. The world today is a much different world than the one this film came out of. It's really a shame it all fell apart the way it did. Now all of our wonderful ideals are constantly trashed by whores, faggots, and jews, and the minds of our youth are poisoned by the intellectual garbage they continue to produce.

So no. You'll never understand it. It's just one of those cases where you really had to be there.

It'd be nice if we could make the world great again. You would be so amazed... in a good way.

But user! This movie wasn't even succesfull when it came out.

>argumentum ad populum