ITT We thank Ajit Pai

Our board will soon be amerimutt-free because of this guy.
Thank you based Indian man.
Thank you India.

Other urls found in this thread:

ibtimes.com/russian-internet-censorship-social-media-crackdown-make-it-easy-putin-stay-popular-1651078
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Thanks india!

It truly warms my heart when Aryans stand together and conquer the mutts.

>euroautists think we'll go away from our own site
im fucking crying from laughter

Redpill me on net neutrality. From what I've been reading, concerns that 4chin will be blocked seem overblown to me.

based india

based pajeet

sigh even that pajeet got a white gf

>im fucking crying from laughter

Net neutrality makes ISPs treat all traffic equally. Repealing it would allow them to jew more money from their customers by throttling services like YouTube / Netflix.
So no, 4chinz won't be blocked.

It gives ISPs the right to throttle or block traffic based on it's content or destination. This would give them the ability to offer access to services (such as internet access to netflix) for an extra fee. The reason they want that is because the internet infrastructure in the US is absolute shit, and can't handle heavy loads like an entire neighborhood streaming 4k video. Fixing their infrastructure is "too expensive" for providers, so that is not an option. It would be like a postal service charging you extra when you send a letter to your mother instead of non-family, when it's just their job to deliver the fucking mail. This basically means that they can block access to sites that aren't google, wikipedia, twitter, facebook, amazon and other major sites, and require customers to buy "extra bundles" to gain access to video streaming, inflammatory sites like Sup Forums, or porn.

Sup Forumstards like this because republicans like it, and because republicans make liberals mad.

What kind of a cuck would pay an ISP to not throttle traffic for a service like netflix that you're already paying for?

Wouldn't it make more sense make big websites pay for "premium priority" on ISPs? So for a yearly fee, Youtube, Facebook, Google, MSNBC, CNN would get the fastest speeds. Small websites would only be available for an extra fee.

That's how cable TV works. The big channels are available on the cheap packages. The small channels cost lots of money to see

Fucking hell, you idiotic yanks actually support it. God fucking damn, it's like seeing someone get a gun pointed at his head, and instead of ducking he pulls the trigger himself.

It also makes it worse because Americans have pretty much zero competition among ISPs, some people have just one coice.

I don't support it, but what can you do?

Comcast, Time Warner, Verizon, AT&T collectively own all the telecommunications infrastructure, TV channels, newspapers, and ISPs :( there's nothing we can do.

>i'm fucking crying from laughter

Ask american posters, many of them will defend it for some reason.

Wouldn't it make more sense if Americand didn't defend anti-consumer ideas? To answer your question, no, it wouldn't. In a real country, the infrastructure would be fixed, or improved, so that it won't crumble when too many people are downloading or streaming shit. It DOES make sense for the ISPs, they'll just rake in money without having to improve the architecture

disgusting, she even has a german surname.
american women know no shame

daily reminder that most americans on Sup Forums actually think this is a good idea

because?

You Americans have guns for when the government turns tyrannical. Now is the time.

Overthrow the government by means of a violent revolution.

Based India

It's 14 dimensional chess-billiards-russian roulette-poker mindgames

If god emperor says it's good, then it must be good and it epic triggers the leftists!!

> Janine Van Lancker
I like to pretend she is Dutch

It's like chinese firewall but capitalistic

look what the fuck do you want us to do

Our president is a neo-conservative who only cares about reducing taxes for himself and laundering money. he doesn't care about infrastructure

the only thing we use guns for is to make normal bar fights deadly

...

I hate this country so fucking much

well it's not like you're on to talk russia
"no vi just want your information of were you live. Vi need to make sure you are protected from outside propaganda"
ibtimes.com/russian-internet-censorship-social-media-crackdown-make-it-easy-putin-stay-popular-1651078

Hey man I'm just surprised that there are people so deep into their ideology bullshit that they'll defend getting fucked in the ass. I do feel bad for americans as a whole though, ISPs having monopolies and trying to Jew the customers who in some states, can't even change ISPs. This is one of the issues where both sides, left and right, should be in agreement

Yea it's fucking awful. no data caps tho.

> This is one of the issues where both sides, left and right, should be in agreement

You don't understand. The big 5 companies have a monopoly on everything. They have so much money. They've bribed the left and the right. The president supports them. He is the one who appointed the pajeet.

People hate Muslims and Mexicans and Hillary so much that they were willing to vote Donald in

oh well. After this, I can have more non-Internet hobbies, like reading books or running

Except its not even about that. ISPs are part of large media companies. They'll throttle competition.

Okay, then starting 2018, I will only use the approved websites, Google, Yahoo, Facebook, etc

None of these are "approved" websites. They are just the ones that got on top of fair competition and they can be toppled when the next bit thing comes along. Google came on top due to their new algorithm of searching the net.

The monopolies that ISPs will create will be that much bigger because not even the competition ground will be fair. There's no doubt they will offer the use of their websites at a lesser price than the rest because they can get money from the add revenue, so even if some other company comes along with a better service it will still be better for the consumer to use the ISP's website because it will be cheaper for them even if both of the website's services are free.

OK FINE

I will only use whatever websites that Comcast, Verizon or AT&T deem proper for me to use. HAPPY?

so basically you're a moron who complains about approved websites but doesn't have a problem using approved websites?
ok got ya

I don't have a fucking choice. It's approved websites or no websites at all

Thanks desu

It's a Japanese site now, remember? Moot sold it.

>Trump
>neo-con

Thank you based American Pai

trump says it is, so it must be

The final revenge for poo in the loo

>wh*Toids are finally being caged
Thank you BLACK Dravidians!

>t. butthurt Iranian

god his smile is fucking awful

>Oh shit, now i have to pay more money to watch my shitty netflix and cuck porn on the internet!
>Now i'll actually have to go out and do something with my life.

NN is the idea that the same government whose direct actions caused and maintain the large telecommunication actors' [in the US] dominant position can be trusted to do a good job of regulating them.

It's at best a band-aid solution attempting to mask a problem that ultimately can only be solved by deregulation.

Just use VPNs or encryption before the FCC makes an attempt on them

Based nubians

vpn and dns changes are usually enough to bypass any government restrictions and censors in the third world countries
doubt american service providers will let people go around their system like that, they got some high tech engineering unlike poor countries.

I don't think they can break current encryption standards, they'd have to outright ban them

overall, the main reason i support the nn repeal is that 70% of the us internet users are racist and hateful bigots so i'm glad to see that majority of those rude retards will get restricted and going to have to pay more for their horrific content

It doesn't matter, most ideologues from black supremacists, to ISlamic extremists to nazis need the internet to breed certain beliefs, and to obtain a false sense of their prevalence

All three will get curb stomped by the government if then even plan to carry out their threats, threatening the government's hold on national security is not something they will tolerate as the 60-80s intelligence activities show

The worst part is it might definitely pass because bipartanism prevents like minded people from protesting together

Burgers on Sup Forums are scum

Burgers on Sup Forums are bro-tier. I will miss you guys

...

they rather corporations step on their nuts than admit government is useful

>left
Intelligent people, though very pretentious and annoying

>right
retards and autists

Hmm ok.

they will ban them, you'll have to buy a company package and allow them/gubmit to monitor you anyway

Any Americans ITT should consider investing in VPN/SSL services, at this rate

Interesting desu

Get to work then and stop it, you can't let this pass

At this rate, dems convince leftists they'll do their bidding, repubs convince conservatives too, but in the end both somehow end up catering almost entirely to corporations while convincing the populace they've won

So actual people are for internet censorship and memes are against it?

Also what is this with American and their orwelian euphemisms.
The call abortion "planned parenthood" and Internet censorship "net neutrality".
Do they live in some Dystopia or what?

Based pajeet. Shitting on the average American. Oh the irony HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA