Is there a more cancerous fanbase than Harry Potter?

Is there a more cancerous fanbase than Harry Potter?

Idk about more but
>mcu/D.C.
>star wars
>dr who

Rival it

Dr Who easily

Game of Thrones

Reddit but Harry Potter is a close second.

Tumblr loves Harry Potter. That's all you need to know.

Why is everything ITT stuff women like?

...

nustar wars fans

bitterness about virginity

Everything named itt is part of the same infantilized adult "group"

really makes you think

Because women are cancer.

...

I would be embarrassed to associate with someone who hangs this on their wall.

>passion

?

>he isn't part of the jesus fanbase

Any entry-level nerdshit is about the same level. My vote would go to Marvel capeshit due to the sheer volume of it.

holy lord jesus

NetHack 3.6.

I legit hate them.

What about this one? It's a night light for your little bedwetter too

idk man it's pretty fun
I went to the wizarding world at orlando it was dope and bought my niece voldemorts wand

am i supposed to laugh or cringe

and Sup Forums wants to save the white race

>mfw that kid grows up to hate or at least dislike both Star Wars and Harry Potter

Would teach the parents a lesson I think.

You're supposed to feel bad for the kid

Only nu-males would hang shit like that in their house.

How does liking Harry Potter and the fucking Hunger Games make you a geek in anyway? Both have the depth of a puddle and are fucking childrens books

where's the pasta?

>Is there a more cancerous fanbase than Harry Potter?

Steven Universe is confirmed as the most cancerous fanbase by far.

Geeks aren't stereotypically intelligent, in fact they are most often stereotyped as infantile.

If it's not sportsball it's geek culture

This. Kids and teenagers who watch that shit are really going to be fucked up when they get older.

>Geeks aren't stereotypically intelligent
Uuuh

But if whites are capable of becoming nu-male cucks en masse, are whites worth saving at all?

You're confusing geeks with nerds. Geeks are just obsessed with science fiction and/or fantasy stories, including comic books.

That's dorks. Geeks are intensive specialists, such as the classic carny geek.

Nerds are things you make fun of, per Dr. Seuss.

Maybe for your nu-male modern meaning, they've always been interchangable otherwise. That's why you have comic book nerds, rpg nerds and other things you PPPRICK

fucking kek'd

Geek isn't the kid with braces and a pocket protector. Geek is the kid with the tetris hoodie and chucks who has a favourite season of Dragonball Z and likes to write fanfiction. Not intelligent.

Geek culture doesn't exist anymore. It died when it became mainstream. Anybody in current year who claims to be a geek is just a mindless consumer hopping on band wagons to fill a void where their personality should be.

kill yourself 90's born queer

>t. born in september of 1989

Nu Star Wars fans

Oh hey, you must have missed my appeal to etymology in which proved your post wrong before you even.. fucking.. made it.

83 actually.

You'd be surprised, one of the leading causes of cancer is Harry Potter, one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Not your best opening but I'll allow it.

Lmfao shut up you pretentious faggot. You want to talk about etymology and the origins of words?

>The Online Etymology Dictionary give the following for "geek": "sideshow freak," 1916, U.S. carnival and circus slang, perhaps a variant of geck "a fool, dupe, simpleton" (1510s)

Sure, some people might use the word to imply intelligence but if you're going to be a fucking faggot and try to prove that the word objectively implies intelligence because of your epic references to Dr. Seuss I need you to know you're retarded.

It was a thing maybe 20 years ago.

Nowadays, geeks are people who get into some "nerdy" fanbase.

The "geeks" who fraternised with other "geeks" playing D&D together while discussing star wars "philosophy" in breaks between contributing to Linux development and rewriting forgotten C64 games to assembly don't exist anymore or at least aren't visible in public because interned killed the need for fraternisation.

I never said anything about intelligence. I said something about intensive focus on a specific discipline. Please stop Freudian projecting your insecurities at me. Circus geeks were not ever known for their intelligence, so your response is stupid on its face. You, sir, have lost this argument.

>backpedalling this hard

I'll see you in class brainlet bitch.

>42
Fuck me, Hitchiker's is great comedy but HURR DURR 42 LMAO dumbasses kill it for everyone

Just remind them that it was originally a radio play, only true geeks know this and pretenders all think it's a book

...

LotR should be replaced with Rick and Morty

>be bald
>will always be nu-male
;_;

>Lotr
>Nu-male
No

Nu males love Lotr.

the movies are numale shit

And the books target kids. They're very good books for kids though and there's nothing wrong in being a book for kids but you get the point.

Came here for this, thanks

>got
>sherlock
>supernatural
>dr who

Have you ever been to /got/ general? They copypaste reddit links there

Star Wars
Anyone who disagrees is a Star Warsfag.

What's wrong with reddit?

Vey funny

Doctor who since their fans are defending white erasure

>reddit's amplitude decreases with distance over time
We are now in the least reddit period of Sup Forums's history, QED

>Everything named itt is part of the same infantilized adult "group"

Thank fuck LOTR is still safe

>who has a favourite season of Dragonball Z

Dragonball Z was normie as fuck and every guy my age watched it. I don't think having a favorite season of it wold make you a geek

>We are now in the least reddit period of Sup Forums's history

I agree completely user

It's a "i'm special ,cool and counterculture because i'm not watching the same tv show as you pleb.Bah humbug" thread

Ure l8 m8

...

Was the green oval ever explained? I only remember seeing it pre-4U during the Abatap days

wrong

...

...

>star wars
>doctor who
>MCU
>DC
>LOTR
>Rick & Morty
>GoT

I could go on the whole day

Don't forget LE FUCKING TOWEL
Christ that fanbase needs gassing

What makes young adult stuff so cancerous?

it's kids shit marketed at young adults

Dr who

The most cancerous fanbase I could think of are:
>Star Wars
>Harry Potter
>Sonic(in its gold times)
>Undertale
>FnaF
>Mlp(in its gold times)
>Doctor Who
>Got
>Honorable mentions:Jojo and Ow

In this case it was a kids book that got more adult with the audience. Now the audience are working young adults who mostly skew left anyway, and revere the Twitter ramblings of a middle aged Scottish socialist as gospel, and look for deep political meaning in the novels. So therefore Trump is Voldemort.

>>Mlp(in its gold times)
you mean when it was just a thing for little girls, not fucking faggots

For gold times I meant when it was relevant and had an huge fanbase of adults, now it's pretty much a zombie

There are antifa retards burning down their own colleges because Trump got elected that literally call themselves Dumbledore's Army.

There's no other fanbase that even comes close to as cancerous.

>had an huge fanbase of adults,
fucking queers. I remember my little sister watching the videos in the late 80s. nuke this fucking planet.

>got more adult
it's still kids shit.

...

Have you ever seen a non-white "nu-male"? Didn't think so.

To be fair the newer version MLP is on a whole other level which actual fleshed out characters, and consistent Aesops, etc. I mean, it's still shit, but at least now it won't make you burn your eyes out with acid.

Jaden Smith.
Oh wait, you said nonwhite.
In that case Gazi Kodzo.

...

there are plenty of jew ones

>rick and morty
>dr who
>Harry Potter
>Sherlock homes
>star wars
>star treck
>breaking bad
>people who consider The Dark Knight to be a major philosophical influence on their life
>anime fans
>any fag shit like teen wolf, supernatural, vampire diaries, american horror story
>reality tv show fans

Stephen Cosmos

American political activists