Post yours

Post yours
Rate others

filteries.com/politics

...

bump

...

forgot to mark a couple sections. didn't change much anyway but whatever.

Probably just shows how unfit I am to rule, but whatever.

...

>National Democratic Socialism
OY VEY

...

Nazi

You are all faggots

NatSoc

ah. I'm a dirty commie.

This thread needs more freedom

Shhh burger

natsoc

What the fuck? Our dots are pretty much in the same place but I'm stuck with some "welfare state" bullshit.

A true cuck, gets welfare state as his a label for whis whole ideology

Huh really? Messing with the sliders I saw it go the welfare state thing too but the dot was a bit more closer to the middle right.

Not even b8

What's the closest real country to this?

America 1980's

>Interventionist

Your blood is weak.

...

This is better.

Am I a cuck? Have I not been red-pilled hard enough? Do I not know how to math??

For some reason, I'm slightly ashamed of this.

...

...

r8

Here you go, NSA.

stuck on prostitution, Sup Forums, convince me. leaning towards legal since it's a mutual agreement that doesn't hurt anyone

give an argument against it besides "muh degeneracy"

Countries that decriminalize prostitution generally see a decrease in activity because it stops being a taboo and generally after a couple of generations it stops being common.

>national capitalism
I'm ok with this

If you legalize something more people will naturally do it. Just by saying something is "illegal" it deters people from it, even if there's no actual punishment.

Prostitution is not something you want to encourage. Banning also doesn't do anything. So I went with illegal but decriminalized

that's entirely fair, actually.

i don't necessarily approve of people doing it but you shouldn't punish people for doing it.

...

Playing around with the filters on this site, I came to the conclusion that Romania is one of the best places in the world to live if you have external income. Like if you're a freelance programmer or something.

>low as fuck cost of living and cost of rent
>relatively high purchasing power
>high economy freedom
>extremely low homicide rate
>99.5% christian

that's not my image...

>lives in brazil

don't think you have to worry bud

That test does look pretty cool. Can't answer it now though, so I'm going to post the classical one with my orientation and that of my country's parties (with the number in parentheses being the number of members in the congress).
Rate?

I don't know enough about the economy but I got a progressive centrist because personal freedoms were high.

sup

Interesting, did you create this yourself? How did you decide where to put the parties?

And I guess I'll post mine

Well, it's probably true I guess

>No woman vote
>imperialism
>monarchy
>death penalty

>centrism

There was an older Nolan chart about it, I just rewrote it into this new chart. Except for Pinochet and Allende, those were my own guesses.
I have my doubts about PC (Communist Party) and PS (Socialist Party) not being higher, but I don't really care about them, so meh.

These are always biased and the questions are made so you look either short-sighted conservative or commie terrorist if you chose one or two certain things "the wrong way". Alright, just wait for me, senpai.

You are in complete deficite mates

>no environmental laws
why

I'm always suspicious of where they choose to plot parties though

Barely any expansionists here... wtf is wrong with you cucks

The layout is confusing, I wanted to select them, same goes for free speech.

Name one single expansionist country that didn't get fucked in the end.

How do I know what all that shit on the right is supposed to do

American education is shit help Sup Forums

USA imperialists

...

yeah, but we lost Panama, Cuba. and the Philippines

>tfw not enough options
>tfw there's also too many options

Why would anyone ever want anything other than individual freedom? Explain this to me!

...

>Progressive
Fuck, I tried.

R8 m8

...

Come at me.

Coming at you

>all these people with a budget balance under 50%

pretty sure you lads keep mixing up the environment and free speech laws

Bernietopias

...

Light = off
Dark = on

Or no?

Yeah, dark is on

shit, yeah I got it mostly reverse then. I thought dark was off, since free speech laws moved the dot towards modernism when light. You know, it being pretty modern to ban hate speech and such.

>all these fucking degenerates in this thread.

weed should carry a death penalty carried out upon arrest

californian

When you press on it and make it darker you are saying you want to censor it

As I've said. When you establish less benefits to corporations and prevent uncontrolled monopolisation, they call it "collectivism". Nah, alright, I am not a mangement-pro anyways, I'm just for democracy and against certain forms of business or governments that can harm the majority.

Why restricting free speech? Didn't you like how we used to like before Putin went full retard?

>used to like
Used to live.

Why, what was it like before Putin? Over here the media is incredibly left wing biased.
Also
>budget balance under 50 percent

I don't personally know much about taxes and spending so i balanced them out

>Prostitution is not something you want to encourage.
And why is that other than muh degeneracy?

It undermines the family

I'm for full freedom of speech. Just messed up here.

How so

>having income tax above 0

wow thats boring

And that is bad for the state because?

>budget balance under 40 percent
>wage gap meme

Oh okay, here is the revised one

>Just because wage gap is not real anymore means that the State should not be opposed to it

Not sure if I also messed it up

...

what does it mean

I fucked up here, yes.

Before 2010s we didn't have hatespeech laws, anti-separatism laws and freedom of assembly wasn't restricted like now. They did it amoslty to prevent the separation of the state because the mood against Caucasus was very high. And nationalism in certain republics like Tatarstan is getting higher. Since 1991 Russian people expected something like a national revival but Yeltsin and Putin aimed to create some new nation without strong sence of ethnicity. Putin is enforcing it now by changing the language of the media. They rarely use the word "Russkij" nowadays, it's replaced by "Rossijskij" which means that the subject belongs to the country but not connected to the Russian nationality. Putin's authoritarian ambitions also require silencing protesters, they need to be stopped from gathering.

no that's right.
39% budget balance is a problem
nice four dimensional name tho like mine

oh god, I fucked it up

i forgot about freedom of speech, i thought white was on

and then when I got to the environment, i knew dark was on, but forgot that freedom of speech wasn't changed

This is me genuinely trying to be as centrist as possible on everything I feel I could morally compromise on.

wait, nevermind. I did it right, they were laws against those topics

werd up son

Libertarian conservative represent.

...

I guess I'm a fucking relic.