Conservashits

> Conservashits

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=NllVMlu0g1Y
youtube.com/watch?v=DkS9y5t0tR0
youtu.be/xKsymgIENDA
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924
youtu.be/9xH1tBT8iU8
m.youtube.com/watch?v=TMW7x0fLaLA
publicintegrity.org/2008/01/23/5641/false-pretenses
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Treason

but that's wrong you fucking retard

>turned a blind eye to the bush family

thats why they voted trump and destroyed the bush families dynasty forever

...

what are u, a 12 years old autistic shit in deep needs with big doubts about your sex?

>war Iraq

Are these people literate?

Trumps aleady called out NeoCon shitheads on their war in Iraq.

So when do you plan on voting for him?

trump was against the war, hilliary voted for it

This is such a perfect responce to ops retardation.

Were not linking chains here to excuse behaivior. Prosecute them all.

Anyone got the list?

youtube.com/watch?v=NllVMlu0g1Y

This has to be bait...
youtube.com/watch?v=DkS9y5t0tR0

Fuck I hate these retards.
Mishandling intelligence
Involuntary manslaughter (could have saved Americans but didn't)
Gross negligence
Unlicensed weapons deals
Bribery
Conduct unbecoming

>Dindu nuffin

18 U.S. Code § 2071
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

>doesn't need to be convicted
>she is guilty
>still running for office

She should have been in prison 20 years ago.

...

Under what specific statutes and regulations - which ones SPECIFICALLY.

In fact, what PROVABLE crime did she do beyond your conspiracy theories.

And don't fucking link me to /cfg/ - they have NOTHING hard.

Prove it.

To say nothing of the financial disaster that happened on the Bush/Cheney watch. You know, the one Obama, the Bin Laden killer, inherited and led you out of.

See

Fbi director basically said "yes she committed these crime but no prosecutor would ever bring charges up because it would bring down Hillary the president and anyone else who sent classified information to her private server causing a huge Constitutional crisis."
The second comey said "we found classified information on Hillary's server" he said they found evidence of her violating the relevant statuts and the only reason she isn't spending the rest of her natural born life in jail is because of who she is.

For reference Petraeus faced charges because he kept classified information in a locked dear drawer in his private residence which violated the relevant statute. A navy submariner was charged and convicted because he took a selfie and accidentally captured a sonar screen and an American soldier in Afghanistan was charged and convicted for warning his fellow soldiers of incoming fighters accidentally through his private email account and not secure channels
youtu.be/xKsymgIENDA
Nit to mention
>Hillary
>Voted for Iraq war
>Supported sanctions on Iraq that killed over 500k Iraq citizens most of which were children

Under what specific statutes you shit spewing retard? Do you even know what those words mean?

...

Do these people forget that Clinton was in favor of that war?

>what is mishandling of classified documents

That's a crime. Just because you don't want it to be doesn't mean it isn't.

>can't name a single crime
ahem:
>e-mails
>insecure server
>Benghazi
These are the ones I know for certain

>turned a blind eye to bush and cheney
I was a kid at the time Bush was in office, why would I have bothered to know anything about that, especially now, that it's rather irrelevant.

>can't name a single crime
Mishandling classified information
Taking bribes from foreign powers through the clinton foundation

I really wish I could have been in that room with Loretta Lynch when she danced around the questions regarding"did Hillary violate any statutes regarding classified information and it's handling" and she just kept repeating "well that would depend on what the statute says"
I'd immediately cite in it's entirety that statute which would force her to do one of two things.
Lie under oath committing perjury and obstruction of Justice.
Or out Hillary Clinton.
I hate how fucking inept our representatives our

Hah, this is so pathetic it actually reads as anti-Hillary propaganda.

They have literally nothing to go on.

The FBI director admitted that she committed crimes and that the only reason she's not getting prosecuted is because it's her.

Anyone else would have been arrested months ago.

SeeThis is the second time you've been linked it so I'm going to assume you're deliberately ignoring it like a faggot

>Bu-bu-bu-bu-but booooooooooooosh

Enabling cognitive dissonance since 2008

you mean the war hillary voted for?

>what is the difference between bureaucratic protocol and law?

You're so fucking clueless.

>can't name a single crime she's committed

o I am fuckin laffing

>Crimes
Treason
Mishandling classified information
Lying under oath
>Republicans turned a blind eye to the Iraq war
Nope. Plenty of Republicans were upset & voted against the war.

She didn't commit any crimes, she's just DANGEROUSLY incompetent. Lighten up and give H a chance.

1 POST BY THIS ID

18 U.S.C. 641, 793, 794, 798, 952, and 1924

How about an easy one: Perjury.

She lied under oath when testifying before congress about her server. She claimed there were no classified documents on her server, but there were. The FBI even said this.

> Plenty of Republicans were upset & voted against the war.

That's not true . It was a unanimous decisions they all voted for it

Says the cuckold

cattle futures

18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally which funny enough invalidates her for holding public office

>(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
>(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

When the FUCK did Republicans vote against the war? Go back and look. There were a lot less than "plenty" of no votes total. One belonged to Obama.

Her fucking emails goddammit.It's not that fucking hard.

Bush and Cheney are not running for president demoshits.

They prosecuted Petraeus and that makes it pretty tough to justify not prosecuting her.
I don't think she needs to go to prison as they typically don't actually lock you up for negligent mishandling but an ordinary person would at least have their clearance revoked.

I truly don't believe she did it with any kind of malicious intent but it's reckless enough I ant see how she can be trusted with such information.

Violating 18 USC 1924

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

...

As you mentioned, the individual's clearance would be stripped from them.

To run for president, you need anovel secret clearance. Something we both know Hillary should no longer have, disqualifing her to run for office.

0/10 shill bait. sage.

You mean the same war Hillary was for?
Yeah, really makes you think

6 congressmen and 1 senator voted against the Use of Military Force against Iraq in 2002.
They were all Republican.
That legislation enabled the Bush administration to launch a war at any time.

*above secretin clearance

Fucking cell...

>custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

>occupy democrats shills hired by CF

OY VEY

She should absolutely face jailtime as other Americans have faced jailtime for violation of the same statute to a significantly smaller degree

youtu.be/9xH1tBT8iU8

Yeah that's what I was suggesting.

Perjury

>unauthorized use of classified e-mails
>extortion
>treason
>arming terrorists

Also, Bush and Cheyney literally never lied. You might not agree with the Iraq War, but American had plenty of legal precedent to invade. Not only did they have the legal authority, they were bound by signature of the Genocide Convention and the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty to remove Saddam.

Unless, that is, you want argue that Saddam didn't commit genocide against the Kurds and didn't use chemical weapons against the Kurds and Iranians. Is that what you're trying to argue?

chaney and bush fabricated "intel"
they completely lied about all of it to get approval

Source?

>Also, Bush and Cheyney literally never lied
They did lie.
Some of the Intel they used to justify the war was known as not only wrong but actually forged before the war happened.

The legal reason we went to war was because Saddam supposedly had an active WMD program.
Which was entirely false and since proven false.

This is a fairly complete breakdown of the lies and deliberate deceptions

m.youtube.com/watch?v=TMW7x0fLaLA

>FBI literally says that if she wasn't who she was she'd be on trial right now
>BUT SHE A GOOD GIRL SHE DIDNU NUFFIN

Sure. The real reason they didn't bring her in is because she'd likely take the entire state department down with her because that's just the sort of person she is.

Obama himself would go down as well because he sent no less than 9 emails containing classified information which is in violation of

>Iraq war cost 1,000,000 lives

Just like those 25 million American Indians who were slaughtered, right?

She's innocent, I tell ya

Even all the paid off globalists said so...Lynch and Bill confirm....innocent

I guess Bill Clinton lied too when he signed the Iraq Liberation Act and said this...

>Iraq admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability, notably, 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs. And I might say UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production....

>Over the past few months, as [the weapons inspectors] have come closer and closer to rooting out Iraq's remaining nuclear capacity, Saddam has undertaken yet another gambit to thwart their ambitions by imposing debilitating conditions on the inspectors and declaring key sites which have still not been inspected off limits....

>It is obvious that there is an attempt here, based on the whole history of this operation since 1991, to protect whatever remains of his capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction, the missiles to deliver them, and the feed stocks necessary to produce them. The UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to restart quickly its production program and build many, many more weapons....

>Now, let's imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he'll use the arsenal....^

>Bill Clinton 1998

GTFO here Bush apologist . You are scum of the earth and bush and Cheney are wanted for war crimes you fucktard

>Hurr Iraq war was criminal

>wanted for war crimes
Better call the police and tell them where they're at.

endless hearings formed by people who want her to rot in prison and literally nothing's come of it
the benghazi committee even falsified emails to make her look guilty and nothing came of it

Athenian direct democracy was dangerous because a large group of misinformed people could inflict cruel torture and writhing pain on someone without the justice of a fair trial.

Founding fathers despised direct democracy. The tea party calls democracy "mob rule" for the same reason.

Founders establish representative democracy and rule of law. Constitutional amendment ensuring right to fair trial, no cruel and unusual punishment, no lynch mobs.

Trump campaign? No right to trial. Imprisonment without justice. Lynch mob mentality.

The right-wing conservatives have allowed themselves to be fooled into abandoning the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Why are they so insanely gullible? Is it because they're bloodthirsty religious extremists like the muslims?

>We all know that OccupyDemocrats memes are almost always sophistic attempts at misinformation.
> I'm assuming people are aware that OP is either a retard trying to troll or a retard mining Sup Forums for rebuttals of memes he find on facebook.

>retards still give this fag attention.

Sage in all fields.

>Source?

Seriously? There are still people on the planet who are so stone fucking ignorant they don't know anything about the 935 lies?

publicintegrity.org/2008/01/23/5641/false-pretenses

All opponents will be arkancided.

>Can't name a single crime she committed
>except that cliff where the FBI director listed all the crimes she committed

Whoever runs Occupy Democrats needs a savage beating.

>We all know that OccupyDemocrats memes are almost always sophistic attempts at misinformation.

*Except when they're right and the facts agree with them

>over decade later
>libcucks STILL bitching about Iraq

It's crazy how none of these faggots were actually affected by the war but they act like it's Vietnam and they all got drafted.

I GUARANTEE the people that actually went and fought in Iraq during the Bush presidency aren't' voting for Hillary. At a minimum because they actually get how big of a deal infosec is.

So you are denying that America had any legal authority to invade Iraq?

Are you denying the Kurdish genocide? Are you denying their use of chemical weapons?

Not an argument

Yes, the Bill Mahers and Michael Moores of the world forget to tell people that Bill Clinton was the one who declared war against Iraq in 1998 and that the Iraq War was a completely bi-partisan effort.

>that source
>not remembering how the events unfolded for yourself (including the First Gulf War)

It's okay, summerfag. You will grow up eventually.

>Under what specific statutes and regulations - which ones SPECIFICALLY.
The constitution has a definition of treason, it aligns quite well with what Hillary did.
>Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
She's been giving them aid like a motherfucker.

honestly I thought that those were just shitposters

>Calling others summer fags when this was extremely widespread information on here years ago

...

>Whoever runs Occupy Democrats needs a savage beating.

Because violence beats critical thinking and facts?

If you're terrified of having your lies exposed and your hypocrisy revealed then you deserve to squirm.

Instead of being reduced to resorting to violence by your own abject stupidity, why not raise your intelligence instead? Think rationally and learn how to reject the fallacies and lies.

>Terrorist group from Afghanistan, and iraq hijacking planes and bombing Shit for ages
>one day terrorist hijack a couple planes
>take down two building killings thousands of people
>crash into the pentagon
>liberal's: HURRR DURR WHAT A DUMB REASON TO GO TO WAR DUUURRRRRRRR COMPLETELY UNJUSTIFIED

leave it up to a poo in loo to post a fake quote

>Are you denying the Kurdish genocide? Are you denying their use of chemical weapons?
Those weren't listed as the legal reason for invasion and the legal reason for invasion was entirely based on deceptions and lies.
Actually watch the information presented instead of shoving your head in the sand in posted it for a reason and that was to inform not bicker with someone

...

OP keeps talking about bush and cheney in this thread. Doesnt respond to facts and citations of what laws she broke. Stay classy, faggot

>claims bush and cheny lied
>no proof

Show proof they lied. They didn't lie. Show a clip of them saying they flew into Iraq and saw WMD's. They never did say that. They had every right to invade over the treaty that allowed inspectors after the first gulf war we won and allowed Saddam to stay in power.

>libshits in charge of knowing anything


Just last month, Bryan Nishimura, a California Naval reservist, was sentenced to two years’ probation and a $7,500 fine after he pleaded guilty to removing classified material and downloading it to a personal electronic device. The FBI found no evidence he planned to distribute the material.

Last year, Bronze Star recipient and combat veteran Chief Petty Officer Lyle White pleaded guilty to storing classified documents on a nonsecure hard drive in Virginia. He received a suspended 60-day sentence and a suspended $10,000 fine in return for the plea. White said the information was for training purposes to study and that he had no intent to communicate with anyone.

Whitaker, now the executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, a government watchdog group, cited three federal statutes Clinton could potentially be in violation of, though he stressed that the FBI still needs to investigate. He referred to a recent Fox News report that someone may have removed the classification label from the documents as the most serious offense.

1/2

Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 798 — disclosure of classified information could apply to someone who “knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person” classified information. Someone guilty of this crime “shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both,” under the law.

Anther law, 18 USC 793 — gathering, transmitting or losing defense information also carries a penalty of an unspecified fine or imprisonment of up to 10 years, or both.

Both 793 and 798 fall under the broader 1917 Espionage Act.

Separately, another potential charge dealing with removing the classification label could be 18 U.S. Code § 2071 — concealment, removal or mutilation generally of classified information. Under this statute, a guilty person “shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

2/2

>Trump
>Hillary

Both jewish shills. Both support Israel and say whatever their supporters wanna hear

The two party system is the real problem

>Bill Clinton was the one who declared war against Iraq in 1998 and that the Iraq War was a completely bi-partisan effort.
Bill only did that under intense pressure while facing impeachment by the neocons who had been pushing for an invasion since before Kuwait.
Bill immediately changed position once these charges were done with.
Also "bi partisan" just means the party of evil and the party of stupid gets together and does something evil and stupid.

Ron Paul had an entirely different voice at the time and introduced his own impeachment proceedings for the illegal act of war Bill was committing at the behest of the neocons.
Btw stop trying o justify crimes because they're done by "both" parties

/thread

op confirmed faggot