1. Is twitter the United States lawmaking body? No.
2. Is twitter trying to form a law? No.
3. Is twitter a United States lawmaking body trying to form a law? No.
4. Is Ben Garrisons understanding of the First Amendment solid? No.
5. Is Ben Garrison a giant idiot with the mental capacity and political understanding of a 15-year-old? Yes.
Why do sofa-nazis and alt-right SJWs aka Sup Forumstards such a giant problem understanding what "free speech" actually means?
Is it against the law to point out hypocrisy? No.
If you think social media has less of an effect on the masses than the government you are a retard. Social media shapes what the majority of people think. Most people get their info from facebook and twitter which are directly linked into happens. They get info first from people on the ground before the government and MsM has a chance. You control who and what gets heard on twitter and you essentially control the narrative.
Is it against the law to ban an opportunist, gigantic, and flamboyant faggot from using your site?
>Most people get their info from facebook and twitter which are directly linked into happens.
Oh okay commie, so should the government pass laws forbidding private companies to ban people from their servers?
Why do you want, the government socializing facebook and twitter?
Nobody said it was.
the law that serves free speech isn't the embodiment of free speech itself, you fucking retard.
Twitter advertises itself as a free speech platform, just like facebook, yet... they do not allow certain types of (conservative, and pretty much anything backed by facts) argument.
It's a hive mind situation that allows the problem to only be discussed from a certain perspective without any solution reached. So, rather than allow free discussion, it directs it.
I seriously doubt you have any grasp on any American right, being that Merkel's got your tongue. Cuck off, cuck.
bait 2/10
Also, Zyklon Ben nailed it with this cartoon faggot.
>Twitter advertises itself as a free speech platform, just like facebook, yet... they do not allow certain types of (conservative, and pretty much anything backed by facts) argument.
Muohh, you haz a sadz?
When has advertisement ever been not completely correct? Outrageous!
>pic related: And you'd still buy it, fatty.
I'll bite.
Free Speech != Freedom of Speech.
They're selectively censoring. He was banned because he's a provocative conservative faggot, not because of what he said.
Think of it this way, you open a shop and say you'll kick out anyone who's too loud then you kick out a bunch of niggers who start talking quietly but leave the white man who's yelling at the TV (opposite day I know), is that not discrimination?
Also, when you start working hand in hand with government you should probably be made to follow the same laws as government agencies.