IT KEEPS GETTING BETTER

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luis_Posada_Carriles&type=revision&diff=729087026&oldid=722505922
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11722
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

These yahoos are just fucking trolls
wew...
> I think this will be a fun hit...

My sides

>I made edits to dispute each claim

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Honest question: how do we know if this stuff wikileaks is releasing is legitimate and not fabricated?

wow

You don't

make up 20k emails on your own time

so basically, they could be leaking fabricated documents simply to push a hidden agenda?

Consider what you're proposing.

Wikileaks either fabricated tens of thousands of emails in an intricate and waterproof way for the sole purpose of taking down Hillary in an unprecedented political attack the likes of which have never before been seen in western society.

OR

Wikileaks or someone else hacked their servers and downloaded 20,000 emails.

The Dems aren't denying it.

We'll make a bot.
Just take any shitposting bot add a few nouns and we'll be golden.

Yes, which is why the real verification comes from the response of the government.

The media silence on it should be all the proof you need. If it wasn't true, they could have come out within the first hours to deny allegations directed to them. Instead, CNN's first report on it wont air until tomorrow.

My father was an avowed socialist.

I don't consider myself fit to be president, and I don't consider Cruz to be either. If Trump could stump him, the media would lead him around on a leash for his whole presidency, just like they did with Dubya for the last half of his.

>We'll make a bot.
yeah, it's that easy

Yes but their agenda is all over the fucking place so who knows. They have made leaks against liberals and conservatives. Most of their 9/11 shit made the Bush administration look awful.

I couldn't tell you what side of the coin they are playing. Pretty sure they are sanders cucks since they didn't start targeting Clinton until sanders lost the nom.

But like I said, who knows with Wikileaks. I don't think I've heard any governments say their leaks are fake, only that they jeopardize the security of nations and they should be shut down for it.

maybe wikileaks got possession of our lovely Tay

the dems I've seen are arguing that the only reason they're releasing these documents is to get Trump elected

Fuck Hillary and hail Trump but just remember that the best place to hide a lie is between two truths. The emails are legit but who is to say one or two are not fabricated? Just be cautious with stuff that seems to good to be true since it may not be. Keep up the good work anons, hope she rots in prison

You're trying to tell us somebody fabricated 20,000 emails that each page is full. Nobody can be that stupid....

Yeah its hard to do. I only managed to make up 4k

Cruz is the zodiac killer

Fabrication... sure.

Hillary and the DNC are actually anointed saints who didn du nuffin

They were all on their way back from Church to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic when Guccifer fabricated the whole thing.

>what shilldogs actually believe

These emails don't represent my family, Julian. Put them away.

Is this legit? Wikipedia shows no history of edits on May 3rd.

I'm actually starting getting worried about how everything Trump says (no matter how absurd it sounds) is at least half true.

No, they don't need to. Let's not kid ourselves most of these emails are going to be about mundane matters about department events, memos, and the usual crap. I'm simply suggesting that it wouldn't be unlikely for someone to fabricate several of the twenty thousand, which would only amount to less than 1/8%.

Obviously WL likes being the distributor of hidden happenings in government so they would be careful about this, but they're still human.

how about prior? cant rule out editing the editing dates

>Wikipedia
>edits

This is from wikileaks, famalam. How the fuck have you not heard about the DNC email leaks? They're dead. The entire democratic party is dead.

possibly this - adding in doubt en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luis_Posada_Carriles&type=revision&diff=729087026&oldid=722505922

He is the last honest man in Washington. Shoots from the hip and calls it like he sees it.

Now Donald, I wouldn't be talking about this if I were you. It would be a bad idea to talk about this to a suspected serial killer. Something might happen to you, and your delegates...

Until they don't release shit on the foundation they dindu nuffin

This kind of question gets asked a lot. It is easy to see if leaks are real or not. Do the people the leaks are about get mad and complain about the harm leaking "sensitive" material could do, or do they laugh it off like they would a silly story in a supermarket tabloid?

>bad information has never been hidden in good information in the history of ever

That said, I'd be willing to believe the leak is all real.

I don't think they were talking bout wiki edits

Here's another discussing what degree Bernie should be cucked by the 'impartial' DNC (chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz) when he was a Time cover story.

>wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11722