I need your help Sup Forums

I need to know what is my political ideology
Im socially centrist(Mixed economy)
I think the state should own most property
Im Anti-Immigration
Im Anti feminism
Im anti fascist
I need help guys, whats my ideology

Other urls found in this thread:

moonofalabama.org/2013/05/syria-the-feckless-left-.html
archive.org/download/AHISTORYOFWESTERNPOLITICALTHOUGHT/A HISTORY OF WESTERN POLITICAL THOUGHT.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Normie-ism

Nah but for real though, whats my ideology, i cant find a definition

what about race? do you want your neighbours to be white? if so this is wrong:
>Im anti fascist
cause ur a nazi. welcome home

Non-Authoritarian National Socialist?

Your a moderate but are pretty cucked thinking state should own everything

I dont give a fuck about my neighbours
And i dont like the nazis
>calls me cucked
>flag

>I think the state should own most property
>Im anti fascist

That's called a "cuck"

moonofalabama.org/2013/05/syria-the-feckless-left-.html

This might interest you.

Nativist populism seems like what you might be looking for.

According to Ian Welsh, Trump is a nativist populist authoritarian. So that without the authoritarianism.

Oh and i forgot to mention i love trump

>I dont give a fuck about my neighbours

so you're okay with hearing ALLAHHUUU AKKBAAAR 5 times a day, or niggers littering all over your neighborhood? cut the shit

>And i dont like the nazis
that sounds extremely cucked. anyway, you don't have to like everything the nazis did to be a national socialist.

What do Norwegians think of Quisling?

Oh i meant neighbours as in countries
in that case im more comfortable with a white neighbourhood
Yea but i dont like it cause im not a hardcore nationalist, im just anti immigration

The state should own most property? What the fuck is wrong with you?

as in companies, factoriest etc.

Most people's beliefs and political scrupples are contradictory.

If you want to have a coherent ideology you need to start from the ground up. People used to believe that competing ideologies were determined by different ontological (human nature) positions..... For example if you believe men are individualistic, security seeking, driven by needs, passions, desires but have poor reasoning abilities in keeping those needs, passions and desires in check then you would probably find yourself drawn to conservatism (pic related)


What do you think human nature is op?

You may be legitimately retarted.

Well exactly what you described
But also i like some elements of socialism
not an argument

traitor, and he was. if i was a nationalist in the 40s and unable to see the future i would be extremely against him

If you don't know the difference between the state and companies/ factories you are probably retarded.

I don't need to make an argument against that.

Also this whole thread is ridiculous. You don't know your own politics.

What do you mean by socialism? There's a difference between the American understanding of socialism (any government interference or safety nets) and actual socialism (commitment to the redistribution of the means of production blah blah)

Conservatives would differ to socialists in that socialists view man as not individualistic and having innate reasoning abilities (perverted by evil capitalism).

One nation conservatism might tick your boxes. They believe in "nobilesse oblige" which means an elite should take pastoral care of the bewildered herd and provide social insurances for their betterment (health, education) so long as it doesn't upset the hierarchy.

State should interfere in many things
High taxes
Those are the things i like about socialism

The point I was making is that it's not just socialists that make government interventions into markets etc. This is a very American, and consequently Sup Forums, understanding of "socialism". One nation conservatism, (classical) liberal reformists, fascists, third-way social democrats all subscribe to government intervention without being socialists.

I suspect what has happened Is that you have found the way people discuss politics in today's day and age inadequate (soundbites, polemics) and need to look into things in more detail.

Drop the memes, chans and youtubers and pick up some books

Do you have any to recommend britbro?

>I think the state should own most property

It's the same case but in a bigger scale

>I think the state should own most property

Congratulations, you're a Chinese Communist.

A history of western political thought by js McClelland.


There used to be a pdf easily accessible

You sound like a Social Democrat.

archive.org/download/AHISTORYOFWESTERNPOLITICALTHOUGHT/A HISTORY OF WESTERN POLITICAL THOUGHT.pdf

>I think the state should own most property
You are a fucking communist
Go to Venezuela you will love it there faggot

nah i dont like social democrats

What about National syndicalism, Peronism, or some other third positionist thought?

>National syndicalism
nah i dont like the economy, i prefer it mixed