There are people who disagree with Eugenics

MASS STERILIZATION NOW!

ITT: We name groups who should be sterilized for the benefit of mankind

>Mental illnesses ( Depression all the way to skizo, narcissism)
>Physical shortcomings ( height, weak immune system)
>Low IQ

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwca_KH7Uc4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Also

>Everyone who does not post ITT

>height
Oh no, I can't be part of the NBA, better get sterilized.

>/mlp/
>"entertainers" aka kiketubers, actors, etc

>Mental illnesses ( Depression all the way to skizo, narcissism)
>Low IQ

What's up with the self-hatred, pol?

>weak immune system
Fuck, but I would be willingly sterilized if it was for the greater good of a national socialist society.

Fellow neighbour banter

Sup Forumstards are generally smarter than average, thought Sup Forums in general is a haven for those with mental illnesses. But yeah, a lot of depression and anxiety is genetic.

Also

>Iberian thread

>>Physical shortcomings ( height, weak immune system)
I can understand the weak immune system bit, but being short isn't always a bad thing.
>Short soldiers are harder to hit
>Making smaller clothes saves resources

You may want to hold off on that. With gene therapy there is some hope

We need Gatica to be real though. We need to create perfect human beings. I see so many people everyday who just look so...deformed

The problem with low IQ is that there is always a lowest IQ and eventually it's you.

I don't want to be sterilized

>source: thread where people post muh iq score

I'm afraid it's already too late for the burgers.

The condition that runs through my family is pretty bad and there's no proper cure in sight now. Hopefully you're right about gene therapy. But if we're considering entry level genetic engineering and modification here then why bother with eugenics at all? The latter is only useful when you can't do the former.

This is true and people underestimate it. In my experience inhabitants of the chins tend to be smarter and more informed about world affairs than most once you account for the high trolling and shitposting, which are intentional and not out of ignorance. The spelling and grammar here also tend to be way above average.

>>Mental illnesses ( Depression all the way to skizo, narcissism)
Slight depression but still a functional member of society
>>Physical shortcomings ( height, weak immune system)
6'3, don't usually get sick, only the occasional cough / cold during winter
>>Low IQ
132

Welfare recipients. Stops the cycle.

White people

>iberian thread
check em

How does someone height effect you
or how ugly someone is

You should only do eugenics on those that makes life worse for others

cuck

The gene pool is a public good and everyone will benefit in the long run from improving it.

I'm not going to raise someone else's kids, kiwi. Stop misusing that word.

or for the sake of your own self , we just need technology to take over with gene therapy and dna modification , say no to autism

>neo-nazi wet dreams

sorry but your little despotic fantasies aren't going to ever be a reality

Daily reminder that eugenics is a tool of antihumanist leftist

m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwca_KH7Uc4

>not North Korea

Eugenics will never benefit you or me - it would take generations of genetic drift to actually see any results. Why, then, should I even care?

>implying there's any meaning to life
Who cares, just mind your own business.

Eugenics programs were a reality merely decades ago.

They don't like reminding people of that.

Sweden of all places had one.

immortality is one of the meanings

>Blueprints for a RAPE MACHINE!

Eugenics is based off of a decent body of science, but it ignores so much evidence in its quest for purity. We still have a lot to learn about the human genome. Removing one trait could have devastating consequences in other areas. For example, sickle cell gene carriers are immune to malaria. If we didn't know that and tried to remove sickle cell genes, we might accidentally remove immunity to malaria, which kills millions of people each year in the tropics.
Another example is your point of mental illness. While it's a noble (but naive) cause to want to remove such diseases, individuals with some of those conditions are more likely to have certain beneficial traits. Anxiety disorders and depressive disorders generally tend to correlate with higher intelligence and other beneficial traits.
Finally, who decides what's worthy of removal? Do you really think it's a good idea to give such vast power to the government?

Eugenics benefited jews.

You're a fucking idiot.

Selective breeding is extremely well understood, because we've practiced it on animals for thousands of years.

Because you're white and thus have the capacity to care for things other than yourself.

>Don't improve yourself, you can get malaria and stuff!

I agree with eugenics but selective breeding is a terrible example. Most dogs today have terrible problems and most cows live in pain their whole life.

They are well optimized for their tasks though.

The problems with purebreeds are also overstated for propaganda reasons.

They are well optimised for a task but overall terrible. The way you are thinking is that of how a tyrant would want his ideal slave race to be.

With much clearer intentions and processes.
However, the best criticism for this is simply looking at a bulldog's medical record.

Sterilizing anyone is counterproductive to the genetic improvement of a species as a whole.
Promote reproduction among the general populace to produce a varied gene pool - let hunger, disease, substance abuse and what not weed out those unfit.
Those who can (and will) provide useful labour will earn money for themselves and their family, allowing them to combat aforementioned "selection factors".
Mandatory donations of egg and seed from every citizen (along with medical record) will provide material for selective breeding programs with specific goals in mind.

>ITT: jewish propaganda to wreck the gentile populations

>ITT: Ideas of the early Anglo-Saxon progressives designed to improve human populations that were hated and expunged from the public scene by Jews like Franz Boas and Stephen J. Gould

ITT: Francis Galton's and Charles Darwin's legacy

A cull of everyone with an IQ under 90 would be hugely beneficial

Niggers

Eugenics makes perfect sense and its opponents are simply retarded.

I have a picture right here for you.

Don't worry. Atheists barely have kids.

Postan

Arthas did nothing wrong

Did Iran sink into the ocean?
I'm kinda shocked I missed hearing about this.

>the republicans
>anti-abortion

>I see so many people everyday who just look so...deformed

>Americans

>greenland is not a shithole

Who the fuck would work the shit jobs then?

people with objections to eugenics, just to be safe

im usually radical with my views but i believe we shouldnt sterilize people for minor things like low iq or for being autistic
these people can still contribute somehow
but before having kid gov should make sure future parents are prepared for that (enough income, maybe some test)
it would weed out people with parasite genes

dogs are bread for fashion. The breeders want, say, pugs to have squished up faces to look like little baby lap dogs, then they breed it. They want the German shep to have a sloped gait, so they breed it.

The goal for dog fanciers is NOT health but note that when breeders want something (like intelligence) they get exactly that.

anyone on welfare including children.