Obama was bad

>obama was bad

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eRKVunuTGDQ&t=8m8s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

This means that the unmployment rate was close to its peak when he was reelected. What rationalization would have been used then?

>Implying that's full time employment.
As what "first" said.

He was also a Muslim

>People dropping off the rolls due to lack of work
>fixing the economy

People just gave up, and they are not counted as unemployed anymore.

Also, one person working 3 part time jobs, counts and 3 employed people

Based Keynesian economics
Trudeau did a classic keynesian deficit. Obama did a neoliberal deficit. Gives hope because neoliberalism is cancer

>trusting far-left progressive modern libshit SJW statistics

2008 DEBT - $10.4 TRILLION

2016 DEBT - $19.6 TRILLION

>OP IS A FAGGOT

Hey you

I like how you cut off all the bars from before 2008

What are the gdo to debt ratios

Exactly, the pic is obviously using the 2008 financial crisis to push a narrative.

I heard they recallibrated definitions of things like "unemployment" so that the statistics appear more favourable. Like declassifying bums as homeless if they have access to a roof for overnight naps eg. Tunnels or abandoned houses etc

He was also the illegitimate son of a Communist poet, not even joking:
youtube.com/watch?v=eRKVunuTGDQ&t=8m8s

Hitler has also gotten rid of unemployment, does it justify his other """solutions"""? I don't think so.

Hitler was great, what the fuck are you babbling on about you whiny pole?

>Hitler was great

some people just don't like the government to think for them, you fucking cuck.

That's a way to dress up the statistics. Obama made millions leave the workforce. Unemployment rates only counts people without a job but actively looking for one. People who don't work and live on welfare don't count as "unemployed".

So the JIDF has set up operations in Poland, that's news to me.

this. I thought this was a Canadian? Guess they've outsourced

Still well above 100%

It's easy to make the squiggly red line do what you want when you keep changing the formula for what qualifies as "unemployed".

But hey, it's a chart on the internet, so it must be true...

10 trillion dollars in national debt in 8 years. Yes it was bad.

This, one should always keep this in mind when reading gubermint-praising posts on the media. They do the same thing in here, hell, entire vocational degrees were created in the 80's - 90's to simply allow listing people as "in training" instead of unemployed, while their actual educational and job market value is next to nothing (kek Datanomi). It also doesn't account for the modern slave labor jobs. If you're listed on the payroll of a labor hiring firm (such as SOL), you aren't counted as unemployed even if they give you 2 hours a week wiping bar floors for 7e/hr. A lot of people have to work shit tier jobs via labor hiring and get so little money that they have to rely on the social aid for the rest. Creating "jobs" like this is simple, whether it improves the lives of the citizens is another matter altogether.

>change what the definition of employment is
you're going to loose your shillbucks CTR