>lying Hillary
Bet that name looks pretty fucking stupid now, huh Sup Forums?
Lying Hillary
>lying about lying
Nice try, Sophist.
It's Crooked Hillary.
>independent
>owned by newspaper that endorsed Hillary Clinton
>politi"fact"
A quick google search showed that the newspaper that runs PolitiFact supports Clinton
edition.cnn.com
LOL this is pure garbage. (((Who))) wrote this?
No but you look pretty stupid OP supporting a known criminal you slobbering fucking traitor.
oops :^)
She can't be held responsible for her lies, she didn't mean to intentionally.
>cherry picking this hard
>sick sources on that right column famalamadingdong
but let's just go ahead and keep dissing politifact in our Sup Forums stormfag hugbox because thats the narrative we like and it makes us feel special, right?
>politifact
>highlighting examples of this website's clear bias is now cherry picking...
So now by your logic, Trump lying sometimes is irrelevant because picking out the times he is over the times he has not is cherry picking...
You fucking moron.
>12 examples out of literally thousands
yes mate, I do call that cherry picking.
>Op
>not a tribalist establishment climber
So a biased source says american politicians speak the truth AT BEST 20% of the time.
And you fags will argue this. Really makes you think...
those FUCKING STRIPES
For a website who's goal is "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" and is being hailed as a credible source of this, 12 examples is more than enough. Particularly when what the OP's pic is graphing is only 50 statements.
>politifact
0/10
lying jew owned media
It's not even cherrypicking. Is a pretty accurate way to put it. Even with PolitiFacts own description he doesn't deserve that "pants on fire" ranking for many of the facts that he's been evaluated on. Some of the grossest misrankings have not been even showed there.
PolitiFact may be independent, but that doesn't mean that they are not biased.
Was Politifact proven to be in collusion with the Clinton campaign in the DNC email leaks?
wtf i hate Politifact now
Wasn't*
politifact does NOT have thousands of donald trump facts
you just proved your opponent correct
>Trump's opponents say he lies
They're lying
I DUNNO MAN IT SEEM KIND OF AGENDA DRIVEN
i dunno but theyve been proven biased by a university study
Those rankings are just terrible.
>No-one remembers this but Trump
>Literally video footage of the happening
So this makes Trump a liar now?
(((politifact)))
just like she told the truth about being shot at in Bosnia, right?
>PolitiFact
>Independent fact-checking website
They are a liberal mouthpiece nothing more.
They apply a much stricter bias to conservatives than liberals.
They rate statements as "Half-true" or "False" even though there isn't anything wrong with what was said, simply just because they think it is misleading.
They fact check hyperboles and critizes people if they give ballpark-numbers and not the exact numbers
They rate statements as false if an "expert" disagrees with it.
Just look at their fact check of Donald Trump's RNC speech: politifact.com
Look what they rated as Half-true or False and tell me how any of these are a clearcut decision. Take for example: "My opponent wants to essentially abolish the Second Amendment" and they rate it as False because it is not "a stated policy of the Clinton campaign"...
>trusting polit-bureau
Like Trump is not also a criminal himself.
Face it, everyone lies, everyone commits crimes from time to time.
You can test every piece of product that comes off the line, or you can take a representative sample and judge the batch like a proper QA program.
Just because it's true, doesn't mean anyone remembers it. :^)