If you can accept modern-day Greeks as whites, what prevents you from accepting Armenians as white as well?

If you can accept modern-day Greeks as whites, what prevents you from accepting Armenians as white as well?

Greeks:
Greek - Indo-European language
Religion - Orthodox Christianity

Armenians:
Armenian - Indo-European language
Religion - Orthodox Christianity

My haplogroups are mtDNA: U2a and Y-DNA: E1b1b1a. How am I different from an average Greek, genetically speaking?

Other urls found in this thread:

dienekes.awardspace.com/calc/anthro/indexf.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

check out the burger king in the back

All the proof i needed

those ppl in the photo are armenians ?

"White" is meaningless as a group. It's a term Germans invented to justify their poor history by associating themselves with the Greeks and Romans, that is to say "We are part of the same group as the most important cultures of history, so we're great!"

There are better racial groupings. Main types in Greece is Mediterranean, Alpine and Dinaric. I think Armenia and Georgia are considered Caucasian and Nordic-Iranian.

It's not completely meaningless. "White" would be Alpine, Nordic, med, and other predominantly European groups who are much closer to each other than to say Negroids or mongoloids or whatever the hell mud people in India are called.

Actually I thought Americans invented the concept of "white". We were the first country, I think, that really mixed all the European ethnic groups.

A lot of Americans don't understand that there ARE different ethnic groups between white people. They literally do not recognize the difference between, say, Slav and French. They would both just be "white".

Armenians would almost certainly be seen as "white". We do recognize "middle eastern" as a separate group but 1) half of that is culture and style -- if an Iranian speaks with no accent and dresses western, he'd mostly just be seen as "white" and 2) Armenians don't look strongly "middle eastern" to me.

Nope, they are Greeks.

No. There was a concept of whiteness before the USA. I could pull out the book and type up some quotes if you want to but Europeans started to notice the stark differences in non-european peoples when they started exploring off the continent. Which kinda coincides with the Americas but not from the USA.

Mediterraneans were never white. Who told you this?

what is this shit?????

not. see the "hayir"

what the fuck is that

Ok, so define what white means, because there doesn't seem to be a general consensus on Sup Forums.

Having white skin is a pretty obvious requirement.

This. Romans would have never grouped themselves with Germanics.

so no answer from OP.

hayir is turkish, these are not Greeks, probably """""""""""Greek"""""""""""" muslims from Thrace that coincidentally most of them are from Turkey. where is that protest even taking place

They're not even Muslim Greeks. I don't know why Turks would hold "ΟΧΙ" signs, but that's not in Greece, since the Burger King food chain doesn't exist in Greece.

yea, OP is an enormous faggot

Armenians= Kim Kardashian
Greeks= bumfucking faggots


Yep, neither is the same as Europeans

Those are Turks you moron.

european=greek word

try again, chink

>If you can accept modern-day Greeks as whites
says who?
People accept them as "European" but that doesn't make them white.
Too many fags on here think "white" is some sort of compliment or gift to be bestowed, i.e. "muh honorary aryan"

Greeks aren't nordic. When we say "white" we mean nordic.

Is there a version of this for females?

Gayreeks, the rape children of turks for 500 years.

The best part about gayreeks is that they think they are Aryan. Golden dawn.
Kek.

Sorry, that was meant for a different thread and I missposted it here. Here: for anyone interested.

There is indeed a female version here: dienekes.awardspace.com/calc/anthro/indexf.html

why do so many armenians look like jews

implying you are any different

If you look at one of these genetic map thingies, like the one in pic related, then Greeks would of course cluster closer to Armenia than British people would, for example. But there will still be a difference, and it's about where you draw the line. I am happy to draw the line at Greece/Bulgaria, and declare anyone to the East of that as non-European and hence not a part of the European family, genetically or culturally.

>a panhead

turkalbanians, the collaborators of turks during the ottoman rule and during the war.

just shut up, omer and keep supporting turdkey as you have always done

>If you can accept modern-day Greeks as whites
i dont

Armenians are christianized Askhenazi Jews.

Triple lulz calling these Khazars white.

>Turkish leftist people marched with placards reading “NO” in solidarity with Greek people on July 4, 2015 at the Istiklal avenue in Istanbul, on the eve of the Greek referendum on its bailout terms. (AFP/OZAN KOSE)
You moron, these people are a Turkish holding up the Oxi which means no in Greece & HAYIR which means god knows what in Turkish, nice try swedecuck.
No, Turks in Turkey.
Greeks cluster closest with Italians/Tuscans and then Albanians.

then ashkenazis are some of the whitest mofos on the planet

>Greeks cluster closest with Italians/Tuscans and then Albanians.
Probably.
I've read interesting things about some clusters. I've read (IIRC), for instance, that Cypriots and Sicilians may be more similar to the historic Southern European populations than modern day Greeks and Italians.