This guys says we should not. he says we should have many partners because that is how we evolved. I wonder though how that would work with child support.
Also I think this guy needs to do more research because how would polyamorous relationships stop inbreeding? Wouldn't this increase inbreeding?
>Pic related
>girl has multiple loving partners.
Other urls found in this thread:
ted.com
twitter.com
Child support shouldn't exist in the first place.
This is a shit thread. please try harder
searching for full version of the first facial abuse vid...can only find 4 min versions....help a negro out...
theres a stream you can find using nudevista i think bro.
Ok well then we should have these crazy relationships because then there would be no more child support. Nobody would know who there own father is.
your pic is a better topic of discussion desu
He is correct that it's how we evolved.
Men - Fuck as many women as possible
Women - Try to get the best mate possible
The end result is the top 20% of men reproducing with 90% of women.
However, in Europe we realized that this sort of society promotes active competition between men, at the detriment of the rest of society. Men, instead of building or creating, are fighting each other for reproductive rights.
So enlightened European thinkers used authority - primarily religious - to impose social controls on society. Men and women must form pair bonds for life, and raise their children properly. Every man should have a wife, and every woman a husband. To help reinforce this pair bonding, we created laws about child support, alimony, adultery and so forth, in order to promote pair bonding, and punish anyone attempting to game the system. (e.g. by marrying and then having an affair)
The goal of this social control is to free men from competition with other men. It allows 80% of the men to breed with 80% of the women. Men, no longer forced to aggressively compete for reproductive rights against other men, begin to invest their energies into building, creating, and improving society as a whole.
It is a trade off - we sacrifice genetic fitness for the sake of a better society.
And so far it's been worth it, especially considering that within the next 20 years we'll be able to manipulate and tune our genetics thanks to technological advances made possible by a pair-bond oriented society.
There is no one is better than the other, in polygamous groups there is no societal progress and lots of cuckolding while in a seriously monogamous society, men are motivated to create and not just fuck loads of different women.
Monogamous relationships are vital to civilization.
That's why everything turns to dust at the moment.
Guessing operation normalize, can some user bring that thread about recent raids
Judge for yourself.
Polyamory would be okay if it wasn't infinitely easier for women to find sexual partners.
With women being the more "desired" sex, destroying monogamy just gives them more power and we end up with a select few chads having 100 wives each.
Shills at full force, we are getting raided here for fuck sake!
>This guys says we should not.
He is a dumbass then. We also evolved to live in small, wandering tribes but he surely isn't proposing to raze cities and go innawoods
This
(((jews))) end up devouring their own even when they don't have a goy to exploit
Reddit raid confirmed
Surely it's not a coincidence that every major civilisation in history has encouraged some form of sexual monogamy. It's one of the building blocks of civilisation, without it we are reduced to mere animals desperately seeking sexual gratification above all else.
The idea that it ought to be abandoned because it isn't inherent to our nature is irrelevant: the only question is whether or not it is beneficial to society--and it clearly is. Our nature tell us to eat as many high fat, high sugar, high salt foods that we can get a hold of because we don't know when we will get a chance to eat again... does that mean we ought to blindly follow this instinct? Of course not. Those that do often suffer from health problems caused by overconsumption because we know longer live in societies where these instincts are needed and/or beneficial.
What makes us distinct from other animals is that we are not merely our passions or our instincts, we are also our ability to reason--and we can decide to contradict our instincts if reason leads us to believe that it will have favourable results.
*no longer
I agree:
Abstinence - God tier, truly ascended human with no need for Carnal pleasures
Monogamous - Excellent tier, upholder of civilization
Polygamous marriage - good tier
married swinger - kike tier
Polygamous unmarried - nigger/aids tier
The key to it is:
Marriage is outdated
Men should be able to have multiple women
Women should be able to have multiple men
There can even be interchange there... like 1 guy has 3 women in tow... while one of those women has 2 other guys.
Its not Cucking if its the regular arrangement and everybody is good with each other. May take some getting used to but thats why its called being open minded.
>kelly balthazar (class of '15)
but she killed herself years ago
>Women should be able to have multiple men
no
Waifu monogamy trumps them all.
Of course we should, romance, and monogamy is a new thing, because we're smarter, sex for us isn't just sex, It's romance, It's a romantic relationship, where you have a strong connection with your partner and keep to each other. Only filthy degenerates with no principles do that, like fucking baboons.
What a fucking moron. Why the cock would he agree to this when they have children? How could he expect it to end any way other than this?