Are light skinned indians basically south europeans?

are light skinned indians basically south europeans?

no, they are mutt indians

Yes, everyone is a european.

but we wuz INDO-aryans

I don't care and I don't know. Bitch lasagna.

Looks like a gipsy

i don't have problem to say that unlike muslim

my ancestor :)

They're iranians - or the aryans.

not really, not the same face traits, they're hairier and shorter too

>they're hairier
nope indians almost have no body hair

i really doubt that, they look really hairy irl :/

nope us and scandi are the most hairier people on the planet

Nah, different facial structures.

Nah. its meds and scandis are the most hairy people

And Ainu from Hokkaido

What nonsense.

scandis? i tought they were hairless
well i might be wrong for the hair-part but indians even light ones=! meds

blonde hair doesn't show up as much as dark hair

look at the antropological maps pajeet

haplomemes suggests they'd be closer to Slavs

They are what we call mutts, you moron. Ancestors were raped and cucked by all sort of ethnic and yet pathetically thinking they are better than the real common indians.

Y-DNA doesn't show genetic relation, only a very tiny almost insignificant part of it

Scandi women can get quite hairy but there are huge differences between individuals.
The least hairy girl I met so far was a redhead.

HIGH TEST

>>Indians have almost no body hair

...

Then why was Soviet Union so helpful to us even thought we didn't provided any value to them in return. Even during Indo-China war, Soviet leader said that it is war between a brother and a friend. I wonder that who was brother and who was friend.

male ancestry is rated higher than overall ancestry or genetic relation in many cultures
considering that even the European part of Russia is less than half R1b it still is somewhat weird

Like all other statistical maps, including the lactose tolerance one, this is inaccurate.

south europeans are basically light skinned indians.