ITT:
1 Your cunt
2 What do you think is one of the greatest cultural fears of your nation
For example, i think we can all agree that one of the greatest cultural fears of USA is that the states will split up and there will be no more union between them.
1: Norway
2: Coming under foreign rule
Other urls found in this thread:
news.nationalgeographic.com
twitter.com
1. Norway
2. Majority immigrant cities/counties and the destruction of tradition to appease our afro-european «brothers»
1. Russia
2. The greatest fear for nation is "become not glorious". The worst period in russian history is oftenly supposed to be "The Time of Troubles" in the beginning of XVII century, when Russia almost lost it's independence and was almost not a political subject.
Flag
It might be American aggression/loss of territory
i rather nuke your country than take it
1 flag
2 another 7-1
Converting into fucking cuba and becoming russkies/chinks dogs
Yeah, I don't think we have a fear of powerless internet trolls
It's coming soon.
That the increasing multiculturalism and progressivism of Canada will strip us of our identity and eventually turn us into America with high crime rates and a racially fractured society.
>one of the greatest cultural fears of USA is that the states will split up and there will be no more union between them
That sounds like what you think we should fear. We don't fear what won't happen.
A common American cultural fear is that the government will become too powerful, and the states will lose their autonomy altogether.
Not him, but there's absolutely no desire in the US to take any territory from Mexico. We already got what we want.
pls, don't
Well Baja would be nice, and controlling the mouth of the Colorado.
>the mouth of the Colorado.
That doesn't exist anymore. The Colorado doesn't reach the Pacific anymore. We drink their milkshake.
Remember, Mexican territory has Mexicans on it, with their cultural respect for the rule of law and all. Want more of that?
I'm not saying you keep the Mexicans there, there is plenty of Mexico for them to go to. Also controlling the mouth of the Colorado might encourage people to stop raping it so much.
You're correct, I never said it was a rational thing, but given our history I think it's understandable the US is something of a bogeyman, I'd go as far as to say it probably adds to a certain degree of subconcious anxiety regarding current relations between our countries.
Yeah, that's not going to happen
Well, we were working on trying to bring back some life to the delta but I don't think the current political environment will allow for that.
>I'd go as far as to say it probably adds to a certain degree of subconcious anxiety regarding current relations between our countries.
I would agree, and I'd say the same about illegal immigration. It's not that big of an actual problem, but it can be used to get people all afraid of singe massive invasion of people whose very first action in this country is to disrespect its borders and break its laws. The response by the Mexican government (and often the people as well) of "what's the big deal? ur rayciss" is frustrating and doesn't help, either.
I like Mexico, and I wish our countries got along better.
>singe massive invasion
some* massive invasion
> flag
that the princes are going to duke it again and we'll need to start the 4th saudi arabian kingdom.
or the eastern region breaking away before we're done with them ...
or that jews choose the Samson option
or that the ikhwan get hold again
or that the african illegals rise in crime
or an armed revolution backed by iran
the ME is a troubling place to be ... other than that .. not much
yeah yeah, your country is shit and the Ayatollah should destroy it, though
theres an ISP for monkeys, what a time we live in :|
If there is a revolution backed by Iran do you think Ismailis in your country (Najran for example) will sign for it or not? What are the actual relations between them and pro-Iran shias (e.g. twelvers)?
To me it never been clear honestly.
nah ... people tend to appreciate life more when not starving or under direct distress.
also, puritans got to them good ..
But I wonder how does the (wahhabi) regime treat them, ain't they oppressed etc. We know it is much against iranian version of shiism so they must be even more on fire about Ismailis since they're even more deviant (according to the wahhabies)
I'm originally from there, and if you ask me, the people there are more inclined to die for the regime than to fight it, the puritans had a lot of rules but one of them stood above the others "allegiance to the ruler is your #1 priority" and they hammered it hard into people's heads.
Also helps that ismailis were had no infrastructure and the "wahaabi" government gave it to them, so they embraced everything the government stood for.. They sometimes even object when things turn liberal
>Also helps that ismailis were had no infrastructure and the "wahaabi" government gave it to them, so they embraced everything the government stood for.. They sometimes even object when things turn liberal
So now they're not very much different from usual muslims, like wear burka-durka, pray 5 times, go to hajj etc???
flag
fall of the EU
1. sweden
2. being white
Chain secessions
1. Britain
2. Not being strong and independent
Trianon lol
you were ruled by foreigners for most of your time
you are jalready just america with a flavour
Freedonia
Probably rise in legit Communists or Nazis. Most of the country hates both.
An economic collapse is another obvious.
Nothing wrong with that imho, what's not to like about a people who live in their own culture
Iceland
D*nish occupation